Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.6\.12\-rc4\-mm\[12\]\s+\-\s+ULOG\s+problem\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.6\.12\-rc4\-mm\[12\]\s+\-\s+ULOG\s+problem\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. Fw: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem (score: 1): Author: u <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 20:24:58 -0700; This is the second report of this happening. ipt_ULOG fails to load starting from 2.6.12-rc4-mm1 with the following error message: FATAL: Error inserting ipt_ULOG (/lib/modules/2.6.12-rc4-mm1-2/kerne; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00728.html (8,242 bytes)
2. Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 11:44:25 -0700 (PDT); Giving the connector a single value 10 is OK, the rest of what the connector is doing in this area is not. I wish you hadn't put the connector into -mm, it's really in need of several fixups still. T; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00761.html (9,926 bytes)
3. Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 11:42:41 -0700 (PDT); That's bogus, each connector will need to allocate it's own specific define in the netlink header, and we're about to run out of numbers. Please redesign the connector so that it doesn't eat more tha; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00762.html (10,238 bytes)
4. Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 11:48:13 -0700 (PDT); I totally agree, it's crap at the current time and the author doesn't fix the problems being shown in it, in fact he defends some of them even this one. It needs lots of work still.; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00763.html (10,546 bytes)
5. Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 11:49:01 -0700 (PDT); Yes. There is no reason connector needs more than one netlink ID.; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00764.html (9,122 bytes)
6. Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 11:54:54 -0700 (PDT); Yes, Evgeni is a complete control freak.; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00768.html (10,163 bytes)
7. Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem (score: 1): Author: aka Dino) BOIE" <util@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 10:25:27 +0400; It does not require several IDs. -- Evgeniy Polyakov Crash is better than data corruption -- Arthur Grabowski Attachment: signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00814.html (10,070 bytes)
8. Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem (score: 1): Author:; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 10:27:17 +0400; There were no problems reported. Completely. What I defend is ability to function correctly when some changes may be introduced by providing some extensions that may be used. -- Evgeniy Polyakov Cras; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00815.html (11,701 bytes)
9. Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem (score: 1): Author:; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 10:27:54 +0400; It does not require more than one socket number. It just can use any other number provided. -- Evgeniy Polyakov Crash is better than data corruption -- Arthur Grabowski Attachment: signature.asc Desc; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00816.html (11,224 bytes)
10. Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem (score: 1): Author:; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 10:39:38 +0400; And how does it indicate that it is bogus? :) It is one netlink user that can use any socket number - and now it is called bogus. What other people suggest is just create some wrapper over netlink_br; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00817.html (12,214 bytes)
11. Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem (score: 1): Author: Fischer <fischer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 07:42:47 -0400; But if you are given your own ID, there should no issues, correct? i.e it will be no different than say rtnetlink. Users would still have to subscribe to topics etc, but thats something you already h; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00823.html (10,577 bytes)
12. Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 18:15:39 +0400; Yes. Not following, sorry. Userspace should use the same socket as kernel - my application previously obtained it from dmesg and later used ULOG. -- Evgeniy Polyakov Crash is better than data corrupt; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg00827.html (11,400 bytes)
13. Fw: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem (score: 1): Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 20:24:58 -0700; This is the second report of this happening. ipt_ULOG fails to load starting from 2.6.12-rc4-mm1 with the following error message: FATAL: Error inserting ipt_ULOG (/lib/modules/2.6.12-rc4-mm1-2/kerne; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg02017.html (8,242 bytes)
14. Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 11:44:25 -0700 (PDT); Giving the connector a single value 10 is OK, the rest of what the connector is doing in this area is not. I wish you hadn't put the connector into -mm, it's really in need of several fixups still. T; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg02050.html (10,095 bytes)
15. Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 11:42:41 -0700 (PDT); That's bogus, each connector will need to allocate it's own specific define in the netlink header, and we're about to run out of numbers. Please redesign the connector so that it doesn't eat more tha; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg02051.html (10,457 bytes)
16. Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 11:48:13 -0700 (PDT); I totally agree, it's crap at the current time and the author doesn't fix the problems being shown in it, in fact he defends some of them even this one. It needs lots of work still.; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg02052.html (10,678 bytes)
17. Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 11:49:01 -0700 (PDT); Yes. There is no reason connector needs more than one netlink ID.; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg02053.html (9,234 bytes)
18. Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 11:54:54 -0700 (PDT); Yes, Evgeni is a complete control freak.; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg02057.html (10,295 bytes)
19. Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem (score: 1): Author: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 10:25:27 +0400; It does not require several IDs. -- Evgeniy Polyakov Crash is better than data corruption -- Arthur Grabowski Attachment: signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg02103.html (10,228 bytes)
20. Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem (score: 1): Author: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 10:27:17 +0400; There were no problems reported. Completely. What I defend is ability to function correctly when some changes may be introduced by providing some extensions that may be used. -- Evgeniy Polyakov Cras; /archives/netdev/2005-05/msg02104.html (11,861 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]