Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.6\.2\-rc2\s+nfsd\+xfs\s+spins\s+in\s+i_size

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.6\.2\-rc2\s+nfsd\+xfs\s+spins\s+in\s+i_size_read\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. Re: 2.6.2-rc2 nfsd+xfs spins in i_size_read() (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 00:03:15 +0000; Okay, what about this little patch?: Index: fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c == RCS file: /cvs/linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c,v retrieving revision 1.212 diff -u -p -r1.212 xfs_iops.c -- fs/xfs; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00039.html (11,550 bytes)
2. Re: 2.6.2-rc2 nfsd+xfs spins in i_size_read() (score: 1): Author: David Weinehall <tao@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 01:06:23 +0100; Huh? XFS_AT_SIZE twice?! [snip] Regards: David Weinehall -- /) David Weinehall <tao@xxxxxxxxxx> /) Northern lights wander (\ // Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky // \) http; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00040.html (10,539 bytes)
3. Re: 2.6.2-rc2 nfsd+xfs spins in i_size_read() (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 00:07:35 +0000; Ah thanks. Stupid braino but fortunately harmless..; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00041.html (9,825 bytes)
4. Re: 2.6.2-rc2 nfsd+xfs spins in i_size_read() (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 08:13:04 -0600; Christoph Hellwig wrote: Okay, what about this little patch?: Index: fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c == RCS file: /cvs/linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c,v retrieving revision 1.212 diff -u -p -r1; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00047.html (11,700 bytes)
5. Re: 2.6.2-rc2 nfsd+xfs spins in i_size_read() (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 15:16:47 +0000; Well, it is nessecary now to update i_size. Or rather it was, I think I can get rid of it again after taking care of initialize_vnode. And initialize_vnode. I have a working patch for the latter, but; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00048.html (10,701 bytes)
6. Re: 2.6.2-rc2 nfsd+xfs spins in i_size_read() (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 18:17:09 +0000; Here's a new diff, that should get rid of all the warnings except for O_DIRECT. I've also addressed the comments from Dave and Steve. Index: fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c == RCS file: /cvs/linux-2.6-xf; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00052.html (12,610 bytes)
7. Re: 2.6.2-rc2 nfsd+xfs spins in i_size_read() (score: 1): Author: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 13:30:37 +0100; This patch appears to work fine, but mkdir() still warns about i_size_write() : i_size_write() called without i_sem Call Trace: [<c013baf0>] i_size_write_check+0x61/0x63 [<f8af2cef>] validate_fields+; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00063.html (9,761 bytes)
8. Re: 2.6.2-rc2 nfsd+xfs spins in i_size_read() (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:33:12 +0000; Well, this one is harmless as the i_size write is on the newly created inode which isn't on the hash yet. Andrew, do you plan to keep the debugging check? If yes I could cludge around it, but I'd pre; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00064.html (9,790 bytes)
9. Re: 2.6.2-rc2 nfsd+xfs spins in i_size_read() (score: 1): Author:; Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 00:03:15 +0000; * Daryl H; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00374.html (11,550 bytes)
10. Re: 2.6.2-rc2 nfsd+xfs spins in i_size_read() (score: 1): Author:; Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 01:06:23 +0100; -- fs/xfs; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00375.html (10,539 bytes)
11. Re: 2.6.2-rc2 nfsd+xfs spins in i_size_read() (score: 1): Author:; Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 00:07:35 +0000; / \) http; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00376.html (9,825 bytes)
12. Re: 2.6.2-rc2 nfsd+xfs spins in i_size_read() (score: 1): Author:; Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 08:13:04 -0600; cloned ex; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00382.html (11,700 bytes)
13. Re: 2.6.2-rc2 nfsd+xfs spins in i_size_read() (score: 1): Author:; Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 15:16:47 +0000; -u -p -r1; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00383.html (10,701 bytes)
14. Re: 2.6.2-rc2 nfsd+xfs spins in i_size_read() (score: 1): Author:; Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 18:17:09 +0000; welcome t; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00387.html (12,610 bytes)
15. Re: 2.6.2-rc2 nfsd+xfs spins in i_size_read() (score: 1): Author:; Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 13:30:37 +0100; ipts. The; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00398.html (9,761 bytes)
16. Re: 2.6.2-rc2 nfsd+xfs spins in i_size_read() (score: 1): Author:; Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:33:12 +0000; e_fields+; /archives/xfs/2004-02/msg00399.html (9,790 bytes)
17. Re: 2.6.2-rc2 nfsd+xfs spins in i_size_read() (score: 1): Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 22:25:21 -0800; riv; /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00334.html (10,331 bytes)
18. Re: 2.6.2-rc2 nfsd+xfs spins in i_size_read() (score: 1): Author: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:20:33 +0100; 74a; /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00338.html (12,093 bytes)
19. Re: 2.6.2-rc2 nfsd+xfs spins in i_size_read() (score: 1): Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 22:25:21 -0800; .1 driv; /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00700.html (10,331 bytes)
20. Re: 2.6.2-rc2 nfsd+xfs spins in i_size_read() (score: 1): Author: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:20:33 +0100; 165074a; /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00704.html (12,093 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]