Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.6\.30\-rc4\:\s+xfs_fsr\s+hangs\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. 2.6.30-rc4: xfs_fsr hangs (score: 1)
Author: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:33:30 +0400
actual 23805, ideal 22890, fragmentation factor 3.84% /mnt/c start inode=0 ino=158 extents before:3 after:1 DONE ino=158 then it hangs INFO: task xfs_fsr:2403 blocked for more than 120 seconds. "ech
/archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00000.html (8,650 bytes)

2. Re: 2.6.30-rc4: xfs_fsr hangs (score: 1)
Author: Heinz Diehl <htd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:14:05 +0200
I can't confirm this here on my systems: liesel:~ # uname -a Linux liesel 2.6.30-rc4 #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat May 2 11:49:13 CEST 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux liesel:~ # xfs_db -r /dev/sdc1 actual 4
/archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00004.html (8,385 bytes)

3. Re: 2.6.30-rc4: xfs_fsr hangs (score: 1)
Author: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 22:35:17 +0400
2009/5/2 Heinz Diehl <htd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: I have this problem on two x86_32 hosts. It runs for about a minute and then hangs. vmstat 1: 0 1 80 30856 12284 1289452 0 0 16384 16380 224 301 0 5 0 95
/archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00005.html (10,427 bytes)

4. Re: 2.6.30-rc4: xfs_fsr hangs (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 02 May 2009 13:56:34 -0500
echo w > /proc/sysrq-trigger dmesg would show all the sleeping processes... -Eric
/archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00006.html (9,170 bytes)

5. Re: 2.6.30-rc4: xfs_fsr hangs (score: 1)
Author: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 22:59:33 +0400
2009/5/2 Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>: It is the same as I posted already: SysRq : Show Blocked State task PC stack pid father xfs_fsr D 00000000 5304 3393 1 ef479dec 00000046 00000001 00000000
/archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00007.html (11,990 bytes)

6. Re: 2.6.30-rc4: xfs_fsr hangs (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 02 May 2009 15:14:00 -0500
hum, only 1 thread, interesting... Thanks, -Eric
/archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00008.html (9,721 bytes)

7. Re: 2.6.30-rc4: xfs_fsr hangs (score: 1)
Author: Ed Tomlinson <edt@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 21:47:51 -0400
I have also had strange stalls with rc4 (but not with rc3). In one case sysrq would just print the title of commands no data would follow. Do not know if this is related but it may be that this is n
/archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00009.html (10,184 bytes)

8. Re: 2.6.30-rc4: xfs_fsr hangs (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 02 May 2009 23:58:48 -0500
(trimming cc's) Does this happen if you try to defrag a single file? i.e. something like: dd if=/dev/zero of=fragfile bs=4k count=1 seek=$I conv=notrunc oflag=sync done I'm guessing it requires some
/archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00010.html (9,962 bytes)

9. Re: 2.6.30-rc4: xfs_fsr hangs (score: 1)
Author: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 11:15:25 +0400
2009/5/3 Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>: Yes, it does.
/archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00011.html (11,813 bytes)

10. Re: 2.6.30-rc4: xfs_fsr hangs (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 09:30:38 -0500
... Oh, interesting. I didn't really expect that. The testcase I provided worked for me. Maybe you can provide your kernel .config and I'll try on a 32-bit box (I only tested 64-bit so far). Thanks,
/archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00013.html (9,265 bytes)

11. Re: 2.6.30-rc4: xfs_fsr hangs (score: 1)
Author: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 00:33:00 +0400
2009/5/3 Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>: Attached. Attachment: config Description: Binary data
/archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00014.html (10,889 bytes)

12. Re: 2.6.30-rc4: xfs_fsr hangs (score: 1)
Author: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 12:54:05 +0400
2009/5/4 Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>: Cannot reproduce it on x86_64 as well.
/archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00019.html (11,442 bytes)

13. Re: 2.6.30-rc4: xfs_fsr hangs (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 18:33:16 -0500
Ok, yep with the testcase I proposed I see this on the fedora 2.6.30-rc4.git3 x86 kernel as well: dd if=/dev/zero of=fragfile bs=4k count=1 seek=$I conv=notrunc oflag=sync done == [ BUG: bad unlock b
/archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00032.html (12,256 bytes)

14. Re: 2.6.30-rc4: xfs_fsr hangs (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 18:55:47 -0500
... Ugh no, those are 2 different inodes.... I can read, really. :) still, looking into it. -Eric
/archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00033.html (9,149 bytes)

15. Re: 2.6.30-rc4: xfs_fsr hangs (score: 1)
Author: Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 20:04:17 -0500
there are 2 subsequent unlocks for the same inode: 1: xfs_iunlock: ip ca2304c0 ino 132 flags 0x5 ... 2: xfs_iunlock: ip ca230980 ino 131 flags 0x5 Ugh no, those are 2 different inodes.... I can read
/archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00035.html (10,492 bytes)

16. Re: 2.6.30-rc4: xfs_fsr hangs (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 20:09:37 -0500
Oh :) I just sent this one to the list ... :) XFS: Fix double unlock of inodes in xfs_swap_extents() commit ef8f7fc549bf345d92f396f5aa7b152b4969cbf7 had an error where we would try to re-unlock the i
/archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00036.html (10,657 bytes)

17. Re: 2.6.30-rc4: xfs_fsr hangs (score: 1)
Author: Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 20:17:49 -0500
I've been chasing this as well, and I found the double xfs iolock unlock which is causing xfs_fsr deadlock itself. I have a fix tested. The patch is coming. Felix Oh :) I just sent this one to the l
/archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00039.html (11,601 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu