Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*3ware\s+9650SE\-16ML\s+w\/XFS\s+\&\s+RAID6\:\s+first\s+impressions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*3ware\s+9650SE\-16ML\s+w\/XFS\s+\&\s+RAID6\:\s+first\s+impressions\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. 3ware 9650SE-16ML w/XFS & RAID6: first impressions (score: 1): Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 09:34:04 -0500 (EST); For read speed, it appears that there is some overhead (2x). With software raid6 I used to get 1.0Gbyte/sec read speed, or at least 800MiB/s across the entire array, now I only get 538MiB/s across th; /archives/xfs/2008-12/msg00103.html (10,605 bytes)
2. Re: 3ware 9650SE-16ML w/XFS & RAID6: first impressions (score: 1): Author: "Hans-Peter Jansen" <hpj@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 13:55:48 +0100; /archives/xfs/2008-12/msg00227.html (9,611 bytes)
3. Re: 3ware 9650SE-16ML w/XFS & RAID6: first impressions (score: 1): Author: Maurice Hilarius <maurice@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 11:35:17 -0700; /archives/xfs/2008-12/msg00229.html (9,651 bytes)
4. 3ware 9650SE-16ML w/XFS & RAID6: first impressions (score: 1): Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 09:34:04 -0500 (EST); /archives/xfs/2008-12/msg00720.html (10,605 bytes)
5. Re: 3ware 9650SE-16ML w/XFS & RAID6: first impressions (score: 1): Author: "Hans-Peter Jansen" <hpj@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 13:55:48 +0100; j; /archives/xfs/2008-12/msg00844.html (9,611 bytes)
6. Re: 3ware 9650SE-16ML w/XFS & RAID6: first impressions (score: 1): Author: Maurice Hilarius <maurice@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 11:35:17 -0700; t; /archives/xfs/2008-12/msg00846.html (9,651 bytes)
7. 3ware 9650SE-16ML w/XFS & RAID6: first impressions (score: 1): Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 09:34:04 -0500 (EST); For read speed, it appears that there is some overhead (2x). With software raid6 I used to get 1.0Gbyte/sec read speed, or at least 800MiB/s across the entire array, now I only get 538MiB/s across th; /archives/xfs/2008-12/msg01337.html (10,262 bytes)
8. Re: 3ware 9650SE-16ML w/XFS & RAID6: first impressions (score: 1): Author: "Hans-Peter Jansen" <hpj@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 13:55:48 +0100; Am Mittwoch, 3. Dezember 2008 schrieb Justin Piszcz: Hustin, if you're after speed, AND sane support, you may consider trying Areca products. I'm biased, since 3ware fed me up completely, when it cam; /archives/xfs/2008-12/msg01461.html (9,712 bytes)
9. Re: 3ware 9650SE-16ML w/XFS & RAID6: first impressions (score: 1): Author: Maurice Hilarius <maurice@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 11:35:17 -0700; Nice Areca advertisement. Of course you can demonstrate how their tech support responded, to a similar DISK failure, with a better suggestion, and more promptly? Buried for biased and irrelevant. --; /archives/xfs/2008-12/msg01463.html (9,769 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]