Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*4k\s+sector\s+drives\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*4k\s+sector\s+drives\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

21. Re: 4k sector drives (score: 1): Author: Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:13:41 +0200; What MAY hurt, also for large writes, are the meta-data operations while writing the file. (e.g. the file-size changes, journaling ...) But i haven't tested that and can't say for sure how much that; /archives/xfs/2010-07/msg00289.html (10,148 bytes)
22. Re: 4k sector drives (score: 1): Author: Khelben Blackstaff <eye.of.the.8eholder@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:02:11 +0300; It hurts a lot. On my 1TB EARS when i was benchmarking unaligned partitions, untarring a linux kernel for example took ages. (tar output finished quickly but then you had to wait a long time till th; /archives/xfs/2010-07/msg00290.html (9,004 bytes)
23. Re: 4k sector drives (score: 1): Author: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:28:38 +0200; Le Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:02:11 +0300 Khelben Blackstaff <eye.of.the.8eholder@xxxxxxxxx> écrivait: Extracting a linux tarball creates lots of very small files, so it is expected to perform very badly on; /archives/xfs/2010-07/msg00291.html (8,959 bytes)
24. Re: 4k sector drives (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 04:47:51 -0400; If it really is one using -s size=4096 is the right thing to do.; /archives/xfs/2010-07/msg00302.html (9,466 bytes)
25. Re: 4k sector drives (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 16:07:03 -0500; Haven't read the whole thread so maybe this is redundant, but make sure all partitions (if any) are 4k aligned as well (unless it has the secret-handshake sector 63 offset...) -Eric; /archives/xfs/2010-07/msg00304.html (9,949 bytes)
26. Re: 4k sector drives (score: 1): Author: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 00:35:21 +0200; Thank you Christoph for clarification, also thanks to Eric - I've been aligning all partitions to a multiple of 512 sectors since a long time, which fits all stripe set sizes up to 256k. Too bad tha; /archives/xfs/2010-07/msg00306.html (10,604 bytes)
27. Re: 4k sector drives (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 11:33:42 -0400; Current fdisk, and with some limitations parted do the right thing and align partitions on at least a 1MB boundary. parted unfortunately lowers alignment again when any kind of optimal I/O size hint; /archives/xfs/2010-07/msg00308.html (9,280 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 27
Page: [1] [2]