Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Another\s+case\s+of\s+\"getfh\s+failed\:\s+Operation\s+not\s+permitted\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Another\s+case\s+of\s+\"getfh\s+failed\:\s+Operation\s+not\s+permitted\"\s*$/: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

1. Another case of "getfh failed: Operation not permitted" (score: 1): Author: Jarkko Santala <jake@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 20:43:50 +0300 (EET DST); I'm running Linux 2.4.6 + linux-2.4.6-xfs-07052001.patch on a RedHat 7.1 based system. When I tried to mount an xfs filesystem (which sits on top of lvm) exported from this box with NFS, I get a "Pe; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00502.html (9,214 bytes)
2. Re: Another case of "getfh failed: Operation not permitted" (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 12:57:25 -0500; Hm, this again... at one point this was chalked up to the nfsd_operations patch that Mandrake was using, but it showed up on SuSE as well - but I never got very far with that. Is your RH7.1 system pr; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00504.html (9,460 bytes)
3. Re: Another case of "getfh failed: Operation not permitted" (score: 1): Author: Jarkko Santala <jake@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 21:05:13 +0300 (EET DST); It is pretty much stock, nfs-utils version is 0.3.1-5. There's of course the reiserfs stuff, xfs utils, new samba, but AFAIK nothing that should have any affect on this. I'm right now trying to compi; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00505.html (10,222 bytes)
4. Re: Another case of "getfh failed: Operation not permitted" (score: 1): Author: Tad Dolphay <tbd@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 13:15:30 -0500 (CDT); Could you also supply the /etc/exports contents from the server and the mount command from the client? Also have you tried "exportfs -arv" on the server? Thanks, Tad; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00506.html (10,435 bytes)
5. Re: Another case of "getfh failed: Operation not permitted" (score: 1): Author: Jarkko Santala <jake@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 21:21:24 +0300 (EET DST); No, pure 2.4.6 and the xfs patch above, nothing else, but... You know what? I just put the kgcc compiled one in and now it seems to work! Ain't that a thing. The previous compile was done with RedHat; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00507.html (10,250 bytes)
6. Re: Another case of "getfh failed: Operation not permitted" (score: 1): Author: Jarkko Santala <jake@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 21:26:01 +0300 (EET DST); You probably got my previous mail already, that it works, at least for now, with kgcc compiled kernel. But here's stuff you asked anyway: --cut-- vaasi:~$ cat /etc/exports /xfs curry(rw) --cut-- curr; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00508.html (11,377 bytes)
7. Re: Another case of "getfh failed: Operation not permitted" (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 21:38:29 +0200; No, pure 2.4.6 and the xfs patch above, nothing else, but... You know what? I just put the kgcc compiled one in and now it seems to work! Ain't that a thing. The previous compile was done with RedHat; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00509.html (10,895 bytes)
8. Re: Another case of "getfh failed: Operation not permitted" (score: 1): Author: Jarkko Santala <jake@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 22:43:09 +0300 (EET DST); Yep, I read it and that's why I tried it. ;) The linux/Makefile did claim the standard RedHat 7.1 gcc to be usable though... -jake -- Jarkko Santala <jake@xxxxxxx> System Administrator Cell. +3584072; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00510.html (9,383 bytes)
9. Re: Another case of "getfh failed: Operation not permitted" (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 15:10:34 -0500; There is an updated compiler from redhat, they released an update and there is an even more recent one in rawhide. I regularly compile with these and do nfs exports - it has been a long time since I; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00511.html (10,141 bytes)
10. Re: Another case of "getfh failed: Operation not permitted" (score: 1): Author: "Orn E. Hansen" <oe.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 22:19:29 +0200; fimmtudagur 12. júlí 2001 21:43, Jarkko Santala skrifađi: Compiling it with gcc does work for vanilla kernels, RH 7.1 on i386 (Athlon) and XFS-1.0.1. Or; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00512.html (9,656 bytes)
11. Re: Another case of "getfh failed: Operation not permitted" (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 22:33:17 +0200; Compiling it with gcc does work for vanilla kernels, RH 7.1 on i386 (Athlon) and XFS-1.0.1. It's machine dependent. There are people using this combination that exhibit problems. I even do, I don't u; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00514.html (10,577 bytes)
12. Re: Another case of "getfh failed: Operation not permitted" (score: 1): Author: Juha Saarinen <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 09:02:10 +1200 (NZST); I've found that -88 builds a stable XFS system (this is using the CVS code), whereas earlier RHL 2.96 gccs didn't. My system's a dual P3 with SCSI and IDE drives. -- Regards, Juha PGP fingerprint: B7; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00515.html (10,158 bytes)
13. Another case of "getfh failed: Operation not permitted" (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 20:43:50 +0300 (EET DST); I'm running Linux 2.4.6 + linux-2.4.6-xfs-07052001.patch on a RedHat 7.1 based system. When I tried to mount an xfs filesystem (which sits on top of lvm) exported from this box with NFS, I get a "Pe; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01793.html (9,214 bytes)
14. Re: Another case of "getfh failed: Operation not permitted" (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 12:57:25 -0500; Hm, this again... at one point this was chalked up to the nfsd_operations patch that Mandrake was using, but it showed up on SuSE as well - but I never got very far with that. Is your RH7.1 system pr; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01795.html (9,460 bytes)
15. Re: Another case of "getfh failed: Operation not permitted" (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 21:05:13 +0300 (EET DST); It is pretty much stock, nfs-utils version is 0.3.1-5. There's of course the reiserfs stuff, xfs utils, new samba, but AFAIK nothing that should have any affect on this. I'm right now trying to compi; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01796.html (10,222 bytes)
16. Re: Another case of "getfh failed: Operation not permitted" (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 13:15:30 -0500 (CDT); Could you also supply the /etc/exports contents from the server and the mount command from the client? Also have you tried "exportfs -arv" on the server? Thanks, Tad; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01797.html (10,435 bytes)
17. Re: Another case of "getfh failed: Operation not permitted" (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 21:21:24 +0300 (EET DST); No, pure 2.4.6 and the xfs patch above, nothing else, but... You know what? I just put the kgcc compiled one in and now it seems to work! Ain't that a thing. The previous compile was done with RedHat; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01798.html (10,250 bytes)
18. Re: Another case of "getfh failed: Operation not permitted" (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 21:26:01 +0300 (EET DST); You probably got my previous mail already, that it works, at least for now, with kgcc compiled kernel. But here's stuff you asked anyway: --cut-- vaasi:~$ cat /etc/exports /xfs curry(rw) --cut-- curr; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01799.html (11,377 bytes)
19. Re: Another case of "getfh failed: Operation not permitted" (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 21:38:29 +0200; No, pure 2.4.6 and the xfs patch above, nothing else, but... You know what? I just put the kgcc compiled one in and now it seems to work! Ain't that a thing. The previous compile was done with RedHat; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01800.html (10,895 bytes)
20. Re: Another case of "getfh failed: Operation not permitted" (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 22:43:09 +0300 (EET DST); Yep, I read it and that's why I tried it. ;) The linux/Makefile did claim the standard RedHat 7.1 gcc to be usable though... -jake -- Jarkko Santala <jake@xxxxxxx> System Administrator Cell. +3584072; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01801.html (9,383 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]