Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Anyone\s+using\s+XFS\s+ACLs\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Anyone\s+using\s+XFS\s+ACLs\?\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. Anyone using XFS ACLs? (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 17:47:38 +0800 (PHT); Hi everyone, I am wondering if anybody on the list is currently using XFS ACLs in some sort of a production environment (although this term has to be qualified). I ask not because of concern with the; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00945.html (8,319 bytes)
2. Re: Anyone using XFS ACLs? (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 08:24:35 -0500 (CDT); I don't know if there's a more elegant way to do it but I think one could do it with xargs, for example from the top level directory: find . -print | xargs -i -t chacl <acl stuff> {} Again might be; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00953.html (9,139 bytes)
3. Re: Anyone using XFS ACLs? (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 08:32:36 -0500; The other option here is for someone to take the source of something like chown which has a -R option, and chacl which does not. Merge the two and send in a patch. This is the sort of project which w; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00954.html (8,931 bytes)
4. Re: Anyone using XFS ACLs? (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 15:51:04 +0200; Federico Sevilla III wrote: I hope my rephrasing my questions will help me get some answers. What needs to be done: o Set the ACLs of a pretty large tree of files and directories recursively. afaik; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00956.html (10,285 bytes)
5. Re: Anyone using XFS ACLs? (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 08:54:20 -0500; Try this: find . -exec chacl <acl stuff> {} \; -- Nate Straz nstraz@xxxxxxx sgi, inc http://www.sgi.com/ Linux Test Project http://ltp.sf.net/; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00957.html (8,605 bytes)
6. Re: Anyone using XFS ACLs? (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 16:02:43 +0200; afaik there is no way to do that directly. Therefore I've written a tiny script(attached below). There may be a many better ways to do it, but it works fine for me ;-) I just copy the old acl, and ad; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00959.html (10,370 bytes)
7. Re: Anyone using XFS ACLs? (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 10:02:43 -0400 (EDT); Actually, that does the exact same thing as 'find | xargs', only slower. ;) It constantly has to spawn new chacl processes, then return to the find, whereas 'find | xargs' finishes the find, then spa; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00960.html (8,743 bytes)
8. Re: Anyone using XFS ACLs? (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 19:35:42 +0200; Actually there is a SUN-extention for NFSv3 to support NFS, and NFSv4 support ACLs natively. I don't think the SUN-extention has been ported to linux, but NFSv4 is on it's way. I don't know what stat; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00981.html (8,436 bytes)
9. Re: Anyone using XFS ACLs? (score: 1): Author: xxx; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 12:37:38 -0500; Still being ported, there may be a status update in Ottawa this month. Steve; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00982.html (8,468 bytes)
10. Anyone using XFS ACLs? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 17:47:38 +0800 (PHT); Hi everyone, I am wondering if anybody on the list is currently using XFS ACLs in some sort of a production environment (although this term has to be qualified). I ask not because of concern with the; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02236.html (8,319 bytes)
11. Re: Anyone using XFS ACLs? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 08:24:35 -0500 (CDT); I don't know if there's a more elegant way to do it but I think one could do it with xargs, for example from the top level directory: find . -print | xargs -i -t chacl <acl stuff> {} Again might be; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02244.html (9,139 bytes)
12. Re: Anyone using XFS ACLs? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 08:32:36 -0500; The other option here is for someone to take the source of something like chown which has a -R option, and chacl which does not. Merge the two and send in a patch. This is the sort of project which w; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02245.html (8,931 bytes)
13. Re: Anyone using XFS ACLs? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 15:51:04 +0200; Federico Sevilla III wrote: I hope my rephrasing my questions will help me get some answers. What needs to be done: o Set the ACLs of a pretty large tree of files and directories recursively. afaik; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02247.html (10,285 bytes)
14. Re: Anyone using XFS ACLs? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 08:54:20 -0500; Try this: find . -exec chacl <acl stuff> {} \; -- Nate Straz nstraz@xxxxxxx sgi, inc http://www.sgi.com/ Linux Test Project http://ltp.sf.net/; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02248.html (8,605 bytes)
15. Re: Anyone using XFS ACLs? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 16:02:43 +0200; afaik there is no way to do that directly. Therefore I've written a tiny script(attached below). There may be a many better ways to do it, but it works fine for me ;-) I just copy the old acl, and ad; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02250.html (10,370 bytes)
16. Re: Anyone using XFS ACLs? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 10:02:43 -0400 (EDT); Actually, that does the exact same thing as 'find | xargs', only slower. ;) It constantly has to spawn new chacl processes, then return to the find, whereas 'find | xargs' finishes the find, then spa; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02251.html (8,743 bytes)
17. Re: Anyone using XFS ACLs? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 19:35:42 +0200; Actually there is a SUN-extention for NFSv3 to support NFS, and NFSv4 support ACLs natively. I don't think the SUN-extention has been ported to linux, but NFSv4 is on it's way. I don't know what stat; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02272.html (8,436 bytes)
18. Re: Anyone using XFS ACLs? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 12:37:38 -0500; Still being ported, there may be a status update in Ottawa this month. Steve; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02273.html (8,468 bytes)
19. Anyone using XFS ACLs? (score: 1): Author: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 17:47:38 +0800 (PHT); Hi everyone, I am wondering if anybody on the list is currently using XFS ACLs in some sort of a production environment (although this term has to be qualified). I ask not because of concern with the; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03527.html (8,319 bytes)
20. Re: Anyone using XFS ACLs? (score: 1): Author: Tad Dolphay <tbd@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 08:24:35 -0500 (CDT); I don't know if there's a more elegant way to do it but I think one could do it with xargs, for example from the top level directory: find . -print | xargs -i -t chacl <acl stuff> {} Again might be; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03535.html (9,186 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]