Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Automated\s+linux\s+kernel\s+testing\s+results\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Automated\s+linux\s+kernel\s+testing\s+results\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Automated linux kernel testing results (score: 1): Author: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 17:20:04 -0700; For those who don't read lkml, I thought I'd point to Martin Bligh's post regarding automated testing being set up, since some people on this list were interested. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lin; /archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00145.html (8,688 bytes)
2. Re: Automated linux kernel testing results (score: 1): Author: Jonathan Day <imipak@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 22:01:23 -0700 (PDT); I am very impressed, especially as it sounds as though a lot more tests exist (he talks of only pushing small amounts of data to kernel.org) and a lot more are going to be added. It seems to me that; /archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00152.html (11,389 bytes)
3. Re: Automated linux kernel testing results (score: 1): Author: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 11:30:48 -0700; Jonathan Day wrote: What I have not (yet) seen is any work on relating the results. Is a bug in the design? The implementation? Some combination thereof? Is something correctly written but not functi; /archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00194.html (9,068 bytes)
4. Automated linux kernel testing results (score: 1): Author: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 17:20:04 -0700; For those who don't read lkml, I thought I'd point to Martin Bligh's post regarding automated testing being set up, since some people on this list were interested. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lin; /archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00746.html (8,359 bytes)
5. Re: Automated linux kernel testing results (score: 1): Author: Jonathan Day <imipak@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 22:01:23 -0700 (PDT); I am very impressed, especially as it sounds as though a lot more tests exist (he talks of only pushing small amounts of data to kernel.org) and a lot more are going to be added. It seems to me that; /archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00753.html (11,458 bytes)
6. Re: Automated linux kernel testing results (score: 1): Author: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 11:30:48 -0700; What I have not (yet) seen is any work on relating the results. Is a bug in the design? The implementation? Some combination thereof? Is something correctly written but not functioning because somet; /archives/netdev/2005-06/msg00795.html (9,081 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]