Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Backup\s+ACLs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Backup\s+ACLs\s*$/: 69 ]

Total 69 documents matching your query.

1. Backup ACLs (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 16:21:58 +0100; Does anybody have experience in backup ACLs on XFS? I met some difficulties on that. version of xfsdump I am using is 1.0.2. I tried them like this: 1. Create a XFS partition -- mkfs.xfs /dev/hda5 -; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01123.html (8,323 bytes)
2. Re: Backup ACLs (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 10:29:45 -0500; Take a look on the ftp site, there is an rpm of 1.0.11 of xfsdump here: ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/cmd_rpms/ Try this version. Steve; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01124.html (8,201 bytes)
3. RE: Backup ACLs (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 16:36:03 +0100; Thanks. Ohmm, I have already downloaded it, but I failed to compile that version on my machine (Power PC). So I used version 1.0.2 as I mentioned before. Is it my version 2.95.2 GCC's problem? Juer; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01126.html (8,631 bytes)
4. Re: Backup ACLs (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 10:50:38 -0500; Hmm, we need more details than 'failed to compile' Steve; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01129.html (8,754 bytes)
5. RE: Backup ACLs (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 16:57:56 +0100; When I compiled it, I got error message as xfs_fsr.c:156: 'O_DIRECT' undeclared here (not in a function) Thougn I can modify some code for that, I am not sure if other problems I will meet. Juer; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01130.html (9,103 bytes)
6. Re: Backup ACLs (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 11:34:05 -0500; O_DIRECT is probably not defined in the user space headers on powerpc, or you need a newer glibc. On my system it is defined in /usr/include/bits/fcntl.h I am using glibc-2.2.2 For the power pc the; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01134.html (8,869 bytes)
7. Re: Backup ACLs (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 07:32:59 +1000; If you compile against the XFS headers from the current xfsprogs-devel rpms, you should find this problem goes away. The Debian porters came across this problem and helped fix it quite awhile ago no; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01143.html (10,623 bytes)
8. RE: Backup ACLs (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 10:00:24 +0100; Nathan, Oh, yes, I have already changed those code for ACl, but I forgot to mention all since I just met the problems when using xfsdump. So you needn't feel strange :) I am now using xfsprogs 1.3.1; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01148.html (11,352 bytes)
9. RE: Backup ACLs (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 11:04:14 +0100; I tried to use a different version of xfs-progs-devel, 1.1.3.0-ppc. It still didn't work.:( Juer; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01150.html (12,128 bytes)
10. RE: Backup ACLs (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 11:51:19 +0100; I used some foolish ways to solve that compiling problem, it works. But when I run xfsrestore, I got WARNING like : xfsrestore: WARNINING: unable to set root extended attribute for 'test': Function; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01151.html (12,902 bytes)
11. RE: Backup ACLs (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 13:33:04 +0100; I think that WARNNING is from 'attr_set' function,because I compiled attr-1.0.3, when I want to list the attributes of a directory, I got the same error message... It's PPC's problem as ACL I think.; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01153.html (13,919 bytes)
12. Re: Backup ACLs (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 09:46:20 -0500; Attempting to respond to several messages here..... The devel part of the various user space packages is included in the one source package, it is just a different build target. If you use the Makepk; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01155.html (9,773 bytes)
13. Re: Backup ACLs (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 08:11:45 +1000; Yup, good summary - one extra thing though - you must also have a working attr command (once you have chacl working), otherwise xfsdump/restore are not going to be able to backup your ACLs (as these; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01159.html (10,495 bytes)
14. RE: Backup ACLs (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 10:28:34 +0100; Nathan, Oh, yes, I can not find the references in /usr/include/xfs/platform_defs.h. But I am sure that I appplied xfs-progs-devel-1.1.3.0-ppc, it seemed that in this version O_DIRECT is still not de; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01175.html (12,709 bytes)
15. Re: Backup ACLs (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 19:43:55 +1000; Oh, just noticed this - sorry, thought you wrote "1.3.1". You will need a more recent version of xfsprogs-devel - if you are using the CVS tree, the xfsprogs/doc/INSTALL document will help you get t; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01177.html (9,671 bytes)
16. RE: Backup ACLs (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 11:33:09 +0100; Thanks. I fixed that. I am now adding sys_attrctl, after I success, I'll share my happiness with all who are helping me. :) Juer; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01180.html (9,665 bytes)
17. RE: Backup ACLs (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 14:42:05 +0100; Unfortuanately, I have some problems in adding attr. I updated the code for attr utiltiy and kernel. The ways is same as that I used for adding ACL When I run "attr -l file", error message like : at; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01187.html (10,188 bytes)
18. RE: Backup ACLs (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 16:59:04 +0100; News: It is my first time to look into the kernel code :( There are some errors when I run 'attr -l juer' -- ' attr_list: Bad address'. It seemed that the error is occured when calling function __us; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01242.html (10,534 bytes)
19. Re: Backup ACLs (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 10:18:49 +1000; Hi Juer, This has come up before when Thomas Graichen was trying to get attrctl working on PowerPC. My best guess at the time was that it was something todo with the structure passed into the attrct; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01254.html (10,701 bytes)
20. Re: Backup ACLs (score: 1): Author: ag>; Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 10:20:10 +1000; [side-note: you probably want to use different printk strings so that its easier to see which part of the code is actually failing]. Now that I think back, I remember Thomas came across this problem; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01256.html (10,617 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]