Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Bad\s+day\s+with\s+xfsrestore\,\s+what\s+went\s+wrong\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Bad\s+day\s+with\s+xfsrestore\,\s+what\s+went\s+wrong\?\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. Bad day with xfsrestore, what went wrong? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 21:13:36 -0400; I hope this is the NNTP equiv of the email list found on this web page: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/ I have been using XFS with Debian for a number of years with great success. Today, xfsrestore; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00362.html (8,756 bytes)
2. left over things in linux-next after 2.6.28-c1 (score: 1): Author: lan@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 22:22:03 -0400; No suggestions / possible answers anyone for my question... Michael Lueck wrote: GreetingsI hope this is the NNTP equiv of the email list found on this web page: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/ I ha; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00580.html (9,245 bytes)
3. PATCH 02/10] kill xfs_buf_iostart (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:23:49 -0500; Michael Lueck wrote: No suggestions / possible answers anyone for my question... Michael Lueck wrote: GreetingsI hope this is the NNTP equiv of the email list found on this web page: http://oss.sgi.c; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00644.html (9,583 bytes)
4. e for old inode item recovery (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:59:50 -0400; Bill Kendall wrote: I tried to reproduce this using the command line you supplied, but everything worked as expected for me. Glad to hear that. Seems my tried and true syntax _can_ still work. Perhap; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00651.html (9,287 bytes)
5. move unused m_inode_quiesce member from struct xfs_mount (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:10:01 +1100; Hi Michael, Maybe the -E option helped you out there. -E Prevents xfsrestore from overwriting newer versions of files. The inode modification time of the on-media file is comâpared to the inode mod; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00652.html (9,357 bytes)
6. xfs_mount (score: 1): Author: tes@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:16:47 -0400; Timothy Shimmin wrote: Maybe the -E option helped you out there. -E Prevents xfsrestore from overwriting newer versions of files. fffffeeeeeeeewwwwwwwwww!!!!!!!!!!! :-) Thank you Tim! You put a smile; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00653.html (9,137 bytes)
7. 31 XFS? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 17) (score: 1): Author: szcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 21:13:36 -0400; I hope this is the NNTP equiv of the email list found on this web page: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/ I have been using XFS with Debian for a number of years with great success. Today, xfsrestore; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01183.html (8,748 bytes)
8. apping refactoring (score: 1): Author: achlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 22:22:03 -0400; No suggestions / possible answers anyone for my question... Michael Lueck wrote: GreetingsI hope this is the NNTP equiv of the email list found on this web page: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/ I ha; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01438.html (9,237 bytes)
9. sanitize xlog_in_core_t definition (score: 1): Author: ic Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:23:49 -0500; Michael Lueck wrote: No suggestions / possible answers anyone for my question... Michael Lueck wrote: GreetingsI hope this is the NNTP equiv of the email list found on this web page: http://oss.sgi.c; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01502.html (9,400 bytes)
10. 3/6] merge xfs_imap into xfs_dilocate (score: 1): Author: ve Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:59:50 -0400; Bill Kendall wrote: I tried to reproduce this using the command line you supplied, but everything worked as expected for me. Glad to hear that. Seems my tried and true syntax _can_ still work. Perhap; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01509.html (9,279 bytes)
11. 4/6] embededd struct xfs_imap into xfs_inode (score: 1): Author: ck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:10:01 +1100; Hi Michael, Maybe the -E option helped you out there. -E Prevents xfsrestore from overwriting newer versions of files. The inode modification time of the on-media file is comâpared to the inode mod; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01510.html (9,178 bytes)
12. PATCH 5/6] kill the XFS_IMAP_BULKSTAT flag (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:16:47 -0400; Timothy Shimmin wrote: Maybe the -E option helped you out there. -E Prevents xfsrestore from overwriting newer versions of files. fffffeeeeeeeewwwwwwwwww!!!!!!!!!!! :-) Thank you Tim! You put a smile; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01511.html (9,129 bytes)
13. Bad day with xfsrestore, what went wrong? (score: 1): Author: Michael Lueck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 21:13:36 -0400; Greetings I hope this is the NNTP equiv of the email list found on this web page: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/ I have been using XFS with Debian for a number of years with great success. Today, x; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg02001.html (8,461 bytes)
14. Re: Bad day with xfsrestore, what went wrong? (score: 1): Author: Michael Lueck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 22:22:03 -0400; No suggestions / possible answers anyone for my question... I hope this is the NNTP equiv of the email list found on this web page: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/ I have been using XFS with Debian; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg02256.html (9,337 bytes)
15. Re: Bad day with xfsrestore, what went wrong? (score: 1): Author: Bill Kendall <wkendall@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:23:49 -0500; I hope this is the NNTP equiv of the email list found on this web page: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/ I have been using XFS with Debian for a number of years with great success. Today, xfsrestore; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg02320.html (9,559 bytes)
16. Re: Bad day with xfsrestore, what went wrong? (score: 1): Author: Michael Lueck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:59:50 -0400; I tried to reproduce this using the command line you supplied, but everything worked as expected for me. Glad to hear that. Seems my tried and true syntax _can_ still work. Perhaps try it without th; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg02327.html (9,274 bytes)
17. Re: Bad day with xfsrestore, what went wrong? (score: 1): Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:10:01 +1100; Hi Michael, Maybe the -E option helped you out there. -E Prevents xfsrestore from overwriting newer versions of files. The inode modification time of the on-media file is com pared to the inode modif; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg02328.html (9,299 bytes)
18. Re: Bad day with xfsrestore, what went wrong? (score: 1): Author: Michael Lueck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:16:47 -0400; -E Prevents xfsrestore from overwriting newer versions of files. fffffeeeeeeeewwwwwwwwww!!!!!!!!!!! :-) Thank you Tim! You put a smile on my face. I worked out that syntax about 5 years ago, keep it; /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg02329.html (9,164 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]