Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*CBQ\s+and\s+all\s+other\s+qdiscs\s+now\s+REALLY\s+completely\s+documented\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*CBQ\s+and\s+all\s+other\s+qdiscs\s+now\s+REALLY\s+completely\s+documented\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (score: 1): Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 21:14:46 +0300 (MSK); SO_PRIORITY. Or I did not follow you? Alexey; /archives/netdev/2001-12/msg00023.html (10,142 bytes)
2. Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (score: 1): Author: bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 19:18:05 +0100; Ah yes, thanks, that sets sk->priority which later sets skb->priority. Regards, bert -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services Trilab The Technology People Netherlabs BV / Rent-a-N; /archives/netdev/2001-12/msg00024.html (11,556 bytes)
3. Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 16:45:01 -0500 (EST); So priority limits the size of skb->priority to be from 0..6; this wont work with that check in cbq. cheers, jamal; /archives/netdev/2001-12/msg00025.html (10,368 bytes)
4. Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (score: 1): Author: bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 22:53:50 +0100; No, only IP_TOS does so. Regards, bert -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services Trilab The Technology People Netherlabs BV / Rent-a-Nerd.nl - Nerd Available - 'SYN! .. SYN|ACK! ..; /archives/netdev/2001-12/msg00026.html (11,209 bytes)
5. Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 17:07:03 -0500 (EST); probaly ip precedence. Have you tried this or you are following what the man pages say? cheers, jamal; /archives/netdev/2001-12/msg00027.html (10,060 bytes)
6. Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (score: 1): Author: bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 23:13:40 +0100; I have been living in the source for quite a while now - see ip_setsockopt() in net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c. Regards, bert -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services Trilab The Technolog; /archives/netdev/2001-12/msg00028.html (11,036 bytes)
7. Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 19:58:40 -0500 (EST); Thats the wrong place to look. Look instead at: net/core/sock.c I got it; non root is limited to 0..6; root can set the full 32 bit range. cheers, jamal; /archives/netdev/2001-12/msg00030.html (9,974 bytes)
8. Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (score: 1): Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 20:04:16 +0300 (MSK); No, it does not. Values different of "low prio" defaults (0..6) are not allowed to user without privileges by evident reasons. User with correspoding capability may direct traffic to any class. Alex; /archives/netdev/2001-12/msg00033.html (9,444 bytes)
9. Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (score: 1): Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 21:14:46 +0300 (MSK); Hello! SO_PRIORITY. Or I did not follow you? Alexey; /archives/netdev/2001-12/msg00120.html (10,189 bytes)
10. Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (score: 1): Author: bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 19:18:05 +0100; Ah yes, thanks, that sets sk->priority which later sets skb->priority. Regards, bert -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services Trilab The Technology People Netherlabs BV / Rent-a-N; /archives/netdev/2001-12/msg00121.html (11,718 bytes)
11. Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 16:45:01 -0500 (EST); So priority limits the size of skb->priority to be from 0..6; this wont work with that check in cbq. cheers, jamal; /archives/netdev/2001-12/msg00122.html (10,397 bytes)
12. Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (score: 1): Author: bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 22:53:50 +0100; No, only IP_TOS does so. Regards, bert -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services Trilab The Technology People Netherlabs BV / Rent-a-Nerd.nl - Nerd Available - 'SYN! .. SYN|ACK! ..; /archives/netdev/2001-12/msg00123.html (11,387 bytes)
13. Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 17:07:03 -0500 (EST); probaly ip precedence. Have you tried this or you are following what the man pages say? cheers, jamal; /archives/netdev/2001-12/msg00124.html (10,089 bytes)
14. Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (score: 1): Author: bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 23:13:40 +0100; I have been living in the source for quite a while now - see ip_setsockopt() in net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c. Regards, bert -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services Trilab The Technolog; /archives/netdev/2001-12/msg00125.html (11,214 bytes)
15. Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 19:58:40 -0500 (EST); Thats the wrong place to look. Look instead at: net/core/sock.c I got it; non root is limited to 0..6; root can set the full 32 bit range. cheers, jamal; /archives/netdev/2001-12/msg00127.html (10,003 bytes)
16. Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented (score: 1): Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 20:04:16 +0300 (MSK); Hello! No, it does not. Values different of "low prio" defaults (0..6) are not allowed to user without privileges by evident reasons. User with correspoding capability may direct traffic to any class; /archives/netdev/2001-12/msg00130.html (9,491 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]