Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Calculating\s+swidth\s+On\s+A\s+RAID6\s+Volume\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Calculating\s+swidth\s+On\s+A\s+RAID6\s+Volume\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Calculating swidth On A RAID6 Volume (score: 1): Author: Andrew Debenham <adebenham@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:06:57 -0400; Hello - I'm am new to XFS and am in the process of trying to tune an XFS file system. I spent some time searching through this mailing list's archives but wasn't able to find anything that matched th; /archives/xfs/2010-07/msg00209.html (11,229 bytes)
2. Re: Calculating swidth On A RAID6 Volume (score: 1): Author: Michael Weissenbacher <mw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:40:33 +0200; Yep, correct Correct too, AFAICT hth, Michael; /archives/xfs/2010-07/msg00210.html (8,181 bytes)
3. Re: Calculating swidth On A RAID6 Volume (score: 1): Author: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:22:39 +0200; Thanks for reminding me, wanted to write a FAQ entry, done now: http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q:_How_to_calculate_the_correct_sunit.2Cswidth_values_for_optimal_performance I think sunit should be; /archives/xfs/2010-07/msg00212.html (10,717 bytes)
4. Re: Calculating swidth On A RAID6 Volume (score: 1): Author: Michael Weissenbacher <mw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:13:29 +0200; Michael, IIRC sunit and swidth are both specified in units of 512 bytes (don't ask me why) so a sunit value of 512 would mean 256KB stripe size which is correct :-) If i am right, the FAQ should be c; /archives/xfs/2010-07/msg00213.html (8,893 bytes)
5. Re: Calculating swidth On A RAID6 Volume (score: 1): Author: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:44:44 +0200; Le Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:13:29 +0200 Michael Weissenbacher <mw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait: Because this is the disk block size for all disks drives ever made except the very latest ones (4096 bytes blocks); /archives/xfs/2010-07/msg00214.html (8,889 bytes)
6. Re: Calculating swidth On A RAID6 Volume (score: 1): Author: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:00:51 +0200; Ah, I remember the difference now, that's why I use su= and sw=. This mix of different units is... irritating. I corrected the FAQ now to use su+sw: http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q:_How_to_calcul; /archives/xfs/2010-07/msg00215.html (10,114 bytes)
7. Re: Calculating swidth On A RAID6 Volume (score: 1): Author: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:04:30 +0200; BTW, "man mount" only mentions "swidth/sunit", while "man mkfs.xfs" mentions "su/sw". Maybe someone can update the docs of mount? -- mit freundlichen Grüssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-managemen; /archives/xfs/2010-07/msg00216.html (9,449 bytes)
8. Re: Calculating swidth On A RAID6 Volume (score: 1): Author: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:27:04 +0200; Le Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:00:51 +0200 Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait: Absolutely, and furthermore I'm wondering what's happening in the case where the drives have 4096; /archives/xfs/2010-07/msg00218.html (9,374 bytes)
9. Re: Calculating swidth On A RAID6 Volume (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:54:29 +1000; No, the sky is not going to fall. ;) The stripe unit is not related to sector size except for the fact that sector size defines the minimum filesystem block size and the stripe unit is an integer mut; /archives/xfs/2010-07/msg00236.html (10,116 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]