Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Compilers\s+\(was\s+Re\:\s+2\.4\.11\s+don\'t\s+work\s+yet\.\)\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Compilers (was Re: 2.4.11 don't work yet.) (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 09:29:44 -0500
Compilers are still a touchy subject... we just found one compiler bug last week w/ the RH 7.1 version of GCC, which caused filesystem corruption if you use xfs_growfs. gcc 3.0.1 from Mandrake did no
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00287.html (9,290 bytes)

2. Re: Compilers (was Re: 2.4.11 don't work yet.) (score: 1)
Author: nic <nic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 15:30:05 +0100
OK - I tried gcc 3.0.0 and it did exactly the same. I'm suspecting my source tree is corrupt. Not what you want over a 'phone line. Thanks all, nic
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00335.html (9,666 bytes)

3. Re: Compilers (was Re: 2.4.11 don't work yet.) (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:47:51 -0500
You say it did exactly the same - can you elaborate? Did you run growfs and see corruption reported after this? Steve
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00337.html (9,307 bytes)

4. Re: Compilers (was Re: 2.4.11 don't work yet.) (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 10:08:30 -0500
Different problem, I think - nic originally reported And then I went off on the growfs tangent. :) -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc.
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00338.html (8,789 bytes)

5. Re: Compilers (was Re: 2.4.11 don't work yet.) (score: 1)
Author: nic <nic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 17:22:05 +0100
OK 2.4.11 with gcc-2.96-85, kgcc and gcc 3.0.0 all exhibit this behaviour. I updated to 2.4.13-pre1 and (with gcc-2.96-85, which I always use because I'm too forgetful to edit the Makefile :-) it st
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00380.html (10,373 bytes)

6. Re: Compilers (was Re: 2.4.11 don't work yet.) (score: 1)
Author: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 03:05:52 +1000
Did you compile your kernel with kdb? grep kdb_main System.map or look for the kdb v1.9 startup line, near the start, after the Memory line.
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00381.html (8,808 bytes)

7. Re: Compilers (was Re: 2.4.11 don't work yet.) (score: 1)
Author: nic <nic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 09:47:58 +0100
Apparently not. What a dork! ;-0 nic (updating to 2.4.13-pre2 and actually compiling kdb in...)
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00490.html (9,159 bytes)

8. Compilers (was Re: 2.4.11 don't work yet.) (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 09:29:44 -0500
?
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01367.html (9,290 bytes)

9. Re: Compilers (was Re: 2.4.11 don't work yet.) (score: 1)
Author: nic <nic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 15:30:05 +0100
.
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01415.html (9,666 bytes)

10. Re: Compilers (was Re: 2.4.11 don't work yet.) (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:47:51 -0500
e
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01417.html (9,307 bytes)

11. Re: Compilers (was Re: 2.4.11 don't work yet.) (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 10:08:30 -0500
e
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01418.html (8,789 bytes)

12. Re: Compilers (was Re: 2.4.11 don't work yet.) (score: 1)
Author: nic <nic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 17:22:05 +0100
,
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01460.html (10,373 bytes)

13. Re: Compilers (was Re: 2.4.11 don't work yet.) (score: 1)
Author: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 03:05:52 +1000
t
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01461.html (8,808 bytes)

14. Re: Compilers (was Re: 2.4.11 don't work yet.) (score: 1)
Author: nic <nic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 09:47:58 +0100
k
/archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01570.html (9,159 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu