Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Compiling\s+custom\s+redhat\s+xfs\s+kernel\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Compiling\s+custom\s+redhat\s+xfs\s+kernel\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Compiling custom redhat xfs kernel (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 15:38:36 +0200; ested a whole disk with xfs and ext2, and neither could mount by label. The answer was already given, complete devices don't show up in /proc/; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00389.html (8,058 bytes)
2. Re: Compiling custom redhat xfs kernel (score: 1): Author: >; Date: 17 Oct 2002 13:12:00 -0500; users out there could test this a bit, it would be much appreciated. Avoid creating attrs for acls which can be stored in the standard permission bits, and remove existing attrs if a; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00393.html (9,931 bytes)
3. Re: Compiling custom redhat xfs kernel (score: 1): Author: x; Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:17:14 +1000; need, then make dep. It sounds like somethings not working, and it could be a default config issue. -- Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00395.html (8,524 bytes)
4. e systems (score: 1): Author: Tweedie" <sct@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 15:38:36 +0200; =2 security concerns are blown away if you thing this as administrator stuff (via a reserved namespace using attribute; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01168.html (8,058 bytes)
5. ompiling custom redhat xfs kernel (score: 1): Author: <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 17 Oct 2002 13:12:00 -0500; ates on the internal f_pos, it doesn't affect the file. The write does affect the file but it re-seeks back to EOF, so the write always appends. Tested on both; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01172.html (9,931 bytes)
6. nimal acls on linux (score: 1): Author: gzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:17:14 +1000; id=183 sandeen@xxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added -- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID Ok, I'm going to close this as invalid (i.e. notabug) since; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01174.html (8,524 bytes)
7. Compiling custom redhat xfs kernel (score: 1): Author: Hans-Peter Zahno <hans-peter.zahno@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 15:38:36 +0200; Hello, I'm using the contribud XFS-Kernel for redhat: 2.4.18-4SGI_XFS_1.1smp on a Dell PE2550 I'm happy with it and it seems to work well. Now I need to recompile it with the following config paramet; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01947.html (8,058 bytes)
8. Re: Compiling custom redhat xfs kernel (score: 1): Author: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 17 Oct 2002 13:12:00 -0500; I'd say make mrproper, make config, set all your bits you need, then make dep. It sounds like somethings not working, and it could be a default config issue. -- Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01951.html (9,981 bytes)
9. Re: Compiling custom redhat xfs kernel (score: 1): Author: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:17:14 +1000; You have deleted the net/core directory from your kernel tree. I bet that you have a script that finds entries called 'core' and deletes them without first checking if they are files or directories.; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01953.html (8,548 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]