Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Current\s+status\s+of\s+2\.5\.x\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Current\s+status\s+of\s+2\.5\.x\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. 5.4 (score: 1): Author: Vernon McPherron <vernon@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 11:24:45 -0700; I haven't been following the 2.5.x branch lately. Does the XFS CVS branch support LVM and MD, or does it still need work? I understood that early 2.5 trees the vfs was quite different from the 2.4 vf; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00201.html (7,227 bytes)
2. 5.x (score: 1): Author: Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:33:16 -0600; Vernon McPherron wrote: I haven't been following the 2.5.x branch lately. Does the XFS CVS branch support LVM and MD, or does it still need work? I understood that early 2.5 trees the vfs was quite d; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00202.html (8,020 bytes)
3. ent (score: 1): Author: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 11 Feb 2002 13:56:59 -0600; Also it must be shown that lvm in 2.5 will be worked on, but there was word from sistna when the released lvm2, that a port would happen at a later time. I think it's best to ask directly on that lis; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00206.html (8,657 bytes)
4. ite (score: 1): Author: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:30:34 +0100; raid0 and raid1 works perfectly, raid5 does not. raid1 over raid0 has resync problems unless you change the resync bio size, but apart from that it should be perfect. -- Jens Axboe; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00210.html (8,237 bytes)
5. pt? (score: 1): Author: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 11 Feb 2002 14:55:05 -0600; Ahh...that explains what I saw on the LVM list then. Thanks! -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx "It is the part of a good she; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00215.html (8,744 bytes)
6. o 2.5.4 (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 11:24:45 -0700; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00775.html (7,227 bytes)
7. f 2.5.x (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:33:16 -0600; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00776.html (8,020 bytes)
8. e event (score: 1): Author: >; Date: 11 Feb 2002 13:56:59 -0600; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00780.html (8,657 bytes)
9. TP site (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:30:34 +0100; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00784.html (8,237 bytes)
10. script? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: 11 Feb 2002 14:55:05 -0600; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00789.html (8,744 bytes)
11. Current status of 2.5.x (score: 1): Author: Vernon McPherron <vernon@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 11:24:45 -0700; I haven't been following the 2.5.x branch lately. Does the XFS CVS branch support LVM and MD, or does it still need work? I understood that early 2.5 trees the vfs was quite different from the 2.4 vf; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01349.html (7,230 bytes)
12. Re: Current status of 2.5.x (score: 1): Author: Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:33:16 -0600; I haven't been following the 2.5.x branch lately. Does the XFS CVS branch support LVM and MD, or does it still need work? I understood that early 2.5 trees the vfs was quite different from the 2.4 vf; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01350.html (8,075 bytes)
13. Re: Current status of 2.5.x (score: 1): Author: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 11 Feb 2002 13:56:59 -0600; Also it must be shown that lvm in 2.5 will be worked on, but there was word from sistna when the released lvm2, that a port would happen at a later time. I think it's best to ask directly on that lis; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01354.html (8,705 bytes)
14. Re: Current status of 2.5.x (score: 1): Author: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:30:34 +0100; raid0 and raid1 works perfectly, raid5 does not. raid1 over raid0 has resync problems unless you change the resync bio size, but apart from that it should be perfect. -- Jens Axboe; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01358.html (8,309 bytes)
15. Re: Current status of 2.5.x (score: 1): Author: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 11 Feb 2002 14:55:05 -0600; Ahh...that explains what I saw on the LVM list then. Thanks! -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx "It is the part of a good she; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01363.html (8,798 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]