Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*DMAPI\s+rights\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. elp (score: 1)
Author: "James A Goodwin" <jagoodwi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:18:50 -0600
Since XFS DMAPI doesn't implement rights, rights obviously can't be attached to tokens. Does this mean that every call requiring a certain level of 'rights' must be called using DM_NO_TOKEN? Thanks,
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00264.html (6,932 bytes)

2. hts (score: 1)
Author: Dean Roehrich <roehrich@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 17:10:43 -0600
No, we do attach rights to tokens. It's just that XFS itself knows nothing about the rights and once you step out of the DMAPI code and into the XFS code your rights won't be honored. A dm_request_r
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00265.html (7,523 bytes)

3. ree (score: 1)
Author: "James A Goodwin" <jagoodwi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 09:09:16 -0600
Are you saying that rights do exist and are checked at the DMAPI level? If so, does this mean that a DMAPI program could use rights to synchronize between DMAPI calls but must use some other mechanis
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00274.html (9,848 bytes)

4. ge? (score: 1)
Author: Dean Roehrich <roehrich@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 08:38:47 -0600
No, we don't block. You just get the vn_hold/vn_rele. The spec talks about it in terms of programs, implying processes, but it's actually meaning tokens, right? Two tokens, referring to the same fil
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00294.html (7,934 bytes)

5. hts (score: 1)
Author: "James A Goodwin" <jagoodwi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:06:18 -0600
You are right. Each of the 'programs' I was mentioning before will have its own token. The dm_request_right() call simply asks the DMAPI to attach the requested right to the token. Any subsequent cal
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00295.html (11,819 bytes)

6. hts (score: 1)
Author: Dean Roehrich <roehrich@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 10:38:19 -0600
Here's what I've been using for now.... In xfs_remove(), where dm_send_namesp_event(DM_EVENT_REMOVE) is called, place zero that is there now. That'll give you the info, and I suspect everything ther
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00296.html (7,448 bytes)

7. e: Help (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:18:50 -0600
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00838.html (6,932 bytes)

8. rights (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 17:10:43 -0600
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00839.html (7,523 bytes)

9. n kfree (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 09:09:16 -0600
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00848.html (9,848 bytes)

10. essage? (score: 1)
Author: x
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 08:38:47 -0600
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00868.html (7,934 bytes)

11. rights (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:06:18 -0600
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00869.html (11,819 bytes)

12. rights (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 10:38:19 -0600
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00870.html (7,448 bytes)

13. DMAPI rights (score: 1)
Author: "James A Goodwin" <jagoodwi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:18:50 -0600
Dean, Since XFS DMAPI doesn't implement rights, rights obviously can't be attached to tokens. Does this mean that every call requiring a certain level of 'rights' must be called using DM_NO_TOKEN? Th
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01412.html (6,932 bytes)

14. Re: DMAPI rights (score: 1)
Author: Dean Roehrich <roehrich@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 17:10:43 -0600
No, we do attach rights to tokens. It's just that XFS itself knows nothing about the rights and once you step out of the DMAPI code and into the XFS code your rights won't be honored. A dm_request_r
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01413.html (7,522 bytes)

15. Re: DMAPI rights (score: 1)
Author: "James A Goodwin" <jagoodwi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 09:09:16 -0600
Are you saying that rights do exist and are checked at the DMAPI level? If so, does this mean that a DMAPI program could use rights to synchronize between DMAPI calls but must use some other mechanis
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01422.html (9,848 bytes)

16. Re: DMAPI rights (score: 1)
Author: Dean Roehrich <roehrich@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 08:38:47 -0600
No, we don't block. You just get the vn_hold/vn_rele. The spec talks about it in terms of programs, implying processes, but it's actually meaning tokens, right? Two tokens, referring to the same fil
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01442.html (7,933 bytes)

17. Re: DMAPI rights (score: 1)
Author: "James A Goodwin" <jagoodwi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:06:18 -0600
You are right. Each of the 'programs' I was mentioning before will have its own token. The dm_request_right() call simply asks the DMAPI to attach the requested right to the token. Any subsequent cal
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01443.html (11,819 bytes)

18. Re: DMAPI rights (score: 1)
Author: Dean Roehrich <roehrich@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 10:38:19 -0600
Here's what I've been using for now.... In xfs_remove(), where dm_send_namesp_event(DM_EVENT_REMOVE) is called, place zero that is there now. That'll give you the info, and I suspect everything ther
/archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01444.html (7,447 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu