Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Default\s+ACL\s+execute\s+permission\s+inheritance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Default\s+ACL\s+execute\s+permission\s+inheritance\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Default ACL execute permission inheritance (score: 1): Author: "Daniel J. Mastrian" <djm2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2001 21:45:48 -0400; I've searched through the Linux-XFS mailing list archives, searched through google, and even skimmed the IEEE Posix 1003.1e draft standard, and perhaps I'm just dense, but I haven't found a sufficien; /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00193.html (8,449 bytes)
2. Re: Default ACL execute permission inheritance (score: 1): Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 14:36:20 +1000; Hi Dan, The result you reported seems correct to me according to the standard. * As you would probably know, the umask takes no effect in this situation with a default ACL. (just thought I'd mention; /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg00239.html (10,234 bytes)
3. Alpha (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2001 21:45:48 -0400; . Any; /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg01083.html (8,449 bytes)
4. roblems with mkfs.xfs (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 14:36:20 +1000; view, I guess the only sane interpretation for this extra argument would be to treat it as the size of the data device. Or just not worry about it - it may actually be more; /archives/xfs/2001-08/msg01129.html (10,234 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]