Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Developerworks\s+XFS\s+introduction\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Developerworks\s+XFS\s+introduction\.\s*$/: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

1. d (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:14:58 +0100 (CET); As linked to from http://linuxtoday.com/ http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2002-01-16-003-20-PS-KN IBM developerWorks: Introducing XFS http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-fs9.htm; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00432.html (7,873 bytes)
2. vs. linux (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 07:40:06 -0500; Would anyone like to comment on the article? Steve L? Thanks! Jeff; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00436.html (8,366 bytes)
3. erworks XFS introduction. (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 20:20:46 +0800 (PHT); (I'm not Steve Lord but ...) I just read the article and everything seems to be in order. Nothing quite new (since I've been using XFS for awhile). However I really like how the NULL issue was explai; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00437.html (8,752 bytes)
4. erworks XFS introduction. (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:55:56 +0100 (CET); Which will probably also fix the null issues. If you opened a file in vi and then save the file it will create a new file with the contents and delete the old file. Deletes are synchronous and _will_; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00438.html (9,589 bytes)
5. ference on IRIX vs. linux (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 20:07:10 +0200; Hmm, why presented by IBM and not SGI ? :) -- Cheers, Hristo.; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00446.html (8,690 bytes)
6. erworks XFS introduction. (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: 16 Jan 2002 12:57:09 -0600; Because IBM is sponsoring (I do not know details) lots of people to write articles about linux things, this is part of a large series on different filestsystems - and it was not written by IBM. Steve; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00447.html (9,481 bytes)
7. erworks XFS introduction. (score: 1): Author: d@xxxxxxx>; Date: 16 Jan 2002 13:06:47 -0600; It is a very good article, and actually I had a question about it. In the part which talks about file delete times, what is the fix for this or what kernel will have it? -- Austin Gonyou Systems Arch; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00448.html (10,351 bytes)
8. XFSthen ext2 file system (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:17:16 +0800 (PHT); I don't think it's "presented" by IBM. IBM merely hosts that DeveloperWorks site, where various people contribute various articles about various aspects of Linux. The article about XFS is the 9th art; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00455.html (8,657 bytes)
9. dead (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 08:35:16 +0100 (CET); IBM was reviewing all the available journaling file systems. Cheers Seth; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00459.html (8,814 bytes)
10. (score: 1): Author: rd@xxxxxxx>; Date: 17 Jan 2002 11:43:09 -0800; Yeah, Daniel Robbins rockzz! :o) Indeed, that would be a big thing. Very, very nice. -- Florin Andrei "The same thing could happen to the computer as what happened to the TV, hardly any interesting p; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00471.html (8,811 bytes)
11. ? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 09:41:05 +0100 (CET); My squid cache looks forward to it :-) Cheers; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00501.html (8,748 bytes)
12. to do in brooklyn when your filesystem is dead (score: 1): Author: <masano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:14:58 +0100 (CET); As linked to from http://linuxtoday.com/ http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2002-01-16-003-20-PS-KN IBM developerWorks: Introducing XFS http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-fs9.htm; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01361.html (7,873 bytes)
13. . (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 07:40:06 -0500; Would anyone like to comment on the article? Steve L? Thanks! Jeff; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01365.html (8,366 bytes)
14. e on IRIX vs. linux (score: 1): Author: ffrey.b.layton@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 20:20:46 +0800 (PHT); (I'm not Steve Lord but ...) I just read the article and everything seems to be in order. Nothing quite new (since I've been using XFS for awhile). However I really like how the NULL issue was explai; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01366.html (8,752 bytes)
15. : Developerworks XFS introduction. (score: 1): Author: jo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:55:56 +0100 (CET); Which will probably also fix the null issues. If you opened a file in vi and then save the file it will create a new file with the contents and delete the old file. Deletes are synchronous and _will_; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01367.html (9,589 bytes)
16. a (score: 1): Author: h_m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 20:07:10 +0200; Hmm, why presented by IBM and not SGI ? :) -- Cheers, Hristo.; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01375.html (8,690 bytes)
17. : OOM difference on IRIX vs. linux (score: 1): Author: to.Grigorov@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 16 Jan 2002 12:57:09 -0600; Because IBM is sponsoring (I do not know details) lots of people to write articles about linux things, this is part of a large series on different filestsystems - and it was not written by IBM. Steve; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01376.html (9,481 bytes)
18. : Developerworks XFS introduction. (score: 1): Author: teve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: 16 Jan 2002 13:06:47 -0600; It is a very good article, and actually I had a question about it. In the part which talks about file delete times, what is the fix for this or what kernel will have it? -- Austin Gonyou Systems Arch; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01377.html (10,351 bytes)
19. why does dbench take so much longer to run on XFSthen ext2 file system (score: 1): Author: hiang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:17:16 +0800 (PHT); I don't think it's "presented" by IBM. IBM merely hosts that DeveloperWorks site, where various people contribute various articles about various aspects of Linux. The article about XFS is the 9th art; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01384.html (8,657 bytes)
20. ings to do in brooklyn when your filesystem is dead (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 08:35:16 +0100 (CET); IBM was reviewing all the available journaling file systems. Cheers Seth; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01388.html (8,814 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]