Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Does\s+ISA\s+interrupt\s+latency\s+harm\s+overall\s+system\s+performance\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Does\s+ISA\s+interrupt\s+latency\s+harm\s+overall\s+system\s+performance\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Does ISA interrupt latency harm overall system performance? (score: 1): Author: Steve Snyder <swsnyder@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 23:09:54 -0700; I understand that ISA devices have a greater interrupt latency than PCI devices. Does this greater latency deteriorate overall system performance or just the device whose interrupts are being service; /archives/netdev/2001-06/msg00119.html (7,953 bytes)
2. Re: Does ISA interrupt latency harm overall system performance? (score: 1): Author: Statux <statux@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 05:03:42 -0400 (EDT); ISA cards are quite a bit slower interrupting, yes. Logically, it would slow a system down because of this, but possibly not enough for you to detect with your eye (or whatever) unless it's a card t; /archives/netdev/2001-06/msg00120.html (10,355 bytes)
3. Re: Does ISA interrupt latency harm overall system performance? (score: 1): Author: Steve Snyder <swsnyder@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 07:40:22 -0700; The throughput varies by ISP and cable modem - and by time of day since you're essentially talking on a party line. The best throughput I've seen on this 3Com cable modem is 100kbytes/sec. 3Com says; /archives/netdev/2001-06/msg00121.html (8,772 bytes)
4. Does ISA interrupt latency harm overall system performance? (score: 1): Author: Steve Snyder <swsnyder@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 23:09:54 -0700; I understand that ISA devices have a greater interrupt latency than PCI devices. Does this greater latency deteriorate overall system performance or just the device whose interrupts are being service; /archives/netdev/2001-06/msg00309.html (7,953 bytes)
5. Re: Does ISA interrupt latency harm overall system performance? (score: 1): Author: Statux <statux@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 05:03:42 -0400 (EDT); ISA cards are quite a bit slower interrupting, yes. Logically, it would slow a system down because of this, but possibly not enough for you to detect with your eye (or whatever) unless it's a card t; /archives/netdev/2001-06/msg00310.html (10,383 bytes)
6. Re: Does ISA interrupt latency harm overall system performance? (score: 1): Author: Steve Snyder <swsnyder@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 07:40:22 -0700; The throughput varies by ISP and cable modem - and by time of day since you're essentially talking on a party line. The best throughput I've seen on this 3Com cable modem is 100kbytes/sec. 3Com says; /archives/netdev/2001-06/msg00311.html (8,866 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]