Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Duplicate\s+directory\s+entries\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Duplicate\s+directory\s+entries\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. Duplicate directory entries (score: 1): Author: "Jim Paradis" <jparadis@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:26:05 -0400; We recently ran across a situation where we saw two directory entries that were exactly the same. A ls -li of the directory in question shows the following: 3758898162 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1592 Jan; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00200.html (10,080 bytes)
2. Re: Duplicate directory entries (score: 1): Author: "Barry Naujok" <bnaujok@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:48:31 +1100; On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 06:26:05 +1100, Jim Paradis <jparadis@xxxxxxxxxxx> We recently ran across a situation where we saw two directory entries that were exactly the same. A ls -li of the directory in q; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00207.html (9,294 bytes)
3. Re: Duplicate directory entries (score: 1): Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:02:54 +1100; What kernel version? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00208.html (7,783 bytes)
4. RE: Duplicate directory entries (score: 1): Author: "Jim Paradis" <jparadis@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:32:42 -0400; David Chinner: 2.6.18 . Has this problem been root-caused and fixed in a more recent version? Looking through the git updates in the main tree doesn't suggest to me that it has... --jim; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00217.html (7,990 bytes)
5. Re: Duplicate directory entries (score: 1): Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:35:57 +1100; No, it was originnally diagnosed on 2.6.5 kernels (sles9) and was fixed around 2.6.17 by the inode i_sem -> i_mutex conversion in mainline before we tracked it down. The root problem there was a sema; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00218.html (8,896 bytes)
6. RE: Duplicate directory entries (score: 1): Author: "Jim Paradis" <jparadis@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:29:14 -0400; . . . upgraded created? track No, we have not recently upgraded the kernel. Unfortunately, we are not yet able to reproduce the problem at will. It's something we observed on a production system, bu; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00250.html (9,053 bytes)
7. 2 shortform structures on ARM old ABI (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:26:05 -0400; that you change the password on your account in order to prevent any unauthorized account access following the network intrusion we previousl; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00589.html (10,080 bytes)
8. H 2/3] split xfs_icsb_balance_counter (score: 1): Author: ch@xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:48:31 +1100; and almost no code, so split it into three separate helpers. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Index: linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/li; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00596.html (9,294 bytes)
9. unter (score: 1): Author: k@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:02:54 +1100; >m_sb_lock is already locked. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Index: linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c == -- linux-2.6-xfs.or; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00597.html (7,783 bytes)
10. 2 shortform structures on ARM old ABI (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:32:42 -0400; for confirmation. (mke2fs -F would work, too...) -Eric Index: xfs-cmds/xfstests/049 == -- xfs-cmds.orig/xfstests/049 +++ xfs-cmds/xfstest; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00606.html (7,990 bytes)
11. d ABI (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:35:57 +1100; eans you have more work to do ;) -Eric Index: xfs-cmds/xfsprogs/include/platform_defs.h.in == -- xfs-cmds.orig/xfsprogs/include/platform_defs.h.in +++ x; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00607.html (8,896 bytes)
12. lem with XFS on nvidia IDE controller (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:29:14 -0400; ek. -- You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists. - Abbie Hoffman; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00639.html (9,053 bytes)
13. Duplicate directory entries (score: 1): Author: "Jim Paradis" <jparadis@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:26:05 -0400; We recently ran across a situation where we saw two directory entries that were exactly the same. A ls -li of the directory in question shows the following: 3758898162 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1592 Jan; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00978.html (10,095 bytes)
14. Re: Duplicate directory entries (score: 1): Author: "Barry Naujok" <bnaujok@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:48:31 +1100; On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 06:26:05 +1100, Jim Paradis <jparadis@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: We recently ran across a situation where we saw two directory entries that were exactly the same. A ls -li of the directo; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00985.html (9,197 bytes)
15. Re: Duplicate directory entries (score: 1): Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:02:54 +1100; What kernel version? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00986.html (7,879 bytes)
16. RE: Duplicate directory entries (score: 1): Author: "Jim Paradis" <jparadis@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:32:42 -0400; David Chinner: 2.6.18 . Has this problem been root-caused and fixed in a more recent version? Looking through the git updates in the main tree doesn't suggest to me that it has... --jim; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00995.html (8,024 bytes)
17. Re: Duplicate directory entries (score: 1): Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:35:57 +1100; No, it was originnally diagnosed on 2.6.5 kernels (sles9) and was fixed around 2.6.17 by the inode i_sem -> i_mutex conversion in mainline before we tracked it down. The root problem there was a sema; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00996.html (9,026 bytes)
18. RE: Duplicate directory entries (score: 1): Author: "Jim Paradis" <jparadis@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:29:14 -0400; entries . . . upgraded created? track No, we have not recently upgraded the kernel. Unfortunately, we are not yet able to reproduce the problem at will. It's something we observed on a production sy; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg01028.html (9,201 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]