- 1. Extended Attributes (score: 1)
- Author: "Quang Nguyen (Ngo)" <quang.nguyen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 10:39:16 -0800
- What are the limitations on extended attributes when calling attr_set() and attr_setf()? How much space can each node hold, and what are the side-effects? Does anyone know if other journaling file sy
- /archives/xfs/2001-12/msg00098.html (7,600 bytes)
- 2. Re: Extended Attributes (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 05 Dec 2001 12:44:15 -0600
- Each one can hold 64K of data. No side effects really - except it will take a little longer to remove the file. Given there is a patch for ext2, it is not inconceivble that ext3 will support them at
- /archives/xfs/2001-12/msg00100.html (8,950 bytes)
- 3. Re: Extended Attributes (score: 1)
- Author: "Mark Feldman" <feldmark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 05:35:55 +0900
- How about limitations on the total number of EA's per file or the total space they can take up per file. Could I have 200, 64K EA's per file? 500? 1000? 10000? Mark and
- /archives/xfs/2001-12/msg00113.html (9,343 bytes)
- 4. Re: Extended Attributes (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 05 Dec 2001 14:44:59 -0600
- No practical limit - they all need different names of course, the organization of the entries is almost identical to directories. I cannot say we do extensive testing of vast attribute spaces, there
- /archives/xfs/2001-12/msg00117.html (10,608 bytes)
- 5. Re: Extended Attributes (score: 1)
- Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 12:07:33 +1100
- There's a patch for ext3 now, based on an -ac tree, from the same folk who do the ext2 version (http://acl.bestbits.at/). The IBM guys tell me there is code in their tree to support extended attribut
- /archives/xfs/2001-12/msg00139.html (8,882 bytes)
- 6. Extended Attributes (score: 1)
- Author:
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 10:39:16 -0800
- ages. I'm streaming a large file at full speed when it ha
- /archives/xfs/2001-12/msg00777.html (7,600 bytes)
- 7. Re: Extended Attributes (score: 1)
- Author:
- Date: 05 Dec 2001 12:44:15 -0600
- swer is that there are not standard numbers available yet
- /archives/xfs/2001-12/msg00779.html (8,950 bytes)
- 8. Re: Extended Attributes (score: 1)
- Author:
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 05:35:55 +0900
- dHat Linux 7.1. The SGI-built kernels work. The RedHat-bu
- /archives/xfs/2001-12/msg00792.html (9,343 bytes)
- 9. Re: Extended Attributes (score: 1)
- Author:
- Date: 05 Dec 2001 14:44:59 -0600
- about your config could have perturbed the code to expose
- /archives/xfs/2001-12/msg00796.html (10,608 bytes)
- 10. Re: Extended Attributes (score: 1)
- Author:
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 12:07:33 +1100
- level dump. I doubt that for a 10GB filesystem it will be
- /archives/xfs/2001-12/msg00818.html (8,882 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu