Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*IRIX\s+XFS\s+filesystem\s+denial\s+of\s+service\s+attack\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*IRIX\s+XFS\s+filesystem\s+denial\s+of\s+service\s+attack\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. ] XFS data corruption (score: 1): Author: H D Moore <sflist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:32:38 -0500; Does this vulnerability affect the Linux XFS port? The XFS page has no information about this or whether there is a fix available: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/ -HD; /archives/xfs/2002-12/msg00153.html (8,600 bytes)
2. on (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: 16 Apr 2002 16:40:00 -0500; hi HD - I don't believe that Linux is affected. I've been told that the Linux I/O path was written specifically to avoid this problem, and I have run some test cases from our original bug report, and; /archives/xfs/2002-12/msg00154.html (8,605 bytes)
3. orruption (score: 1): Author: H D Moore <sflist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:32:38 -0500; Does this vulnerability affect the Linux XFS port? The XFS page has no information about this or whether there is a fix available: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/ -HD; /archives/xfs/2002-12/msg00426.html (8,600 bytes)
4. ata corruption 2 (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: 16 Apr 2002 16:40:00 -0500; hi HD - I don't believe that Linux is affected. I've been told that the Linux I/O path was written specifically to avoid this problem, and I have run some test cases from our original bug report, and; /archives/xfs/2002-12/msg00427.html (8,605 bytes)
5. atus on RH7.3 installer ? (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: 16 Apr 2002 16:40:00 -0500; ere are scripts in anaconda, scripts/buildinstall to be exact, that do what you want, I think. You need to have the tree set up correctly, but eventually you get the boot image & a tree t; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00236.html (9,576 bytes)
6. denial of service attack (score: 1): Author: H D Moore <sflist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:32:38 -0500; n't believe that Linux is affected. I've been told that the Linux I/O path was written specifically to avoid this problem, and I have run some test cases from our original bug report, and; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00237.html (9,613 bytes)
7. n RH7.3 installer ? (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: 16 Apr 2002 16:40:00 -0500; w to do the step that I stopped on, which was to generate a disk/disc image for booting from the cdrom. The default Redhat installer uses a 2.8M installer image in the dosutil; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00874.html (9,576 bytes)
8. ? (score: 1): Author: H D Moore <sflist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:32:38 -0500; pts in anaconda, scripts/buildinstall to be exact, that do what you want, I think. You need to have the tree set up correctly, but eventually you get the boot image & a tree t; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00875.html (9,613 bytes)
9. Re: IRIX XFS filesystem denial of service attack (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:32:38 -0500; Does this vulnerability affect the Linux XFS port? The XFS page has no information about this or whether there is a fix available: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/ -HD; /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00117.html (8,507 bytes)
10. IRIX XFS filesystem denial of service attack (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 14:49:34 -0700 (PDT); _____________________________________________________________________________ SGI Security Advisory ______________________________________________________________________________ - -- - -- Issue Spec; /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00133.html (23,633 bytes)
11. Re: IRIX XFS filesystem denial of service attack (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 13:55:35 -0500 (CDT); Wouldn't ulimit and or rlimits help mitigate this issue on linux systems? Thanks, Ron DuFresne ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity. It elimin; /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00134.html (9,283 bytes)
12. Re: IRIX XFS filesystem denial of service attack (score: 1): Author: >; Date: 16 Apr 2002 16:28:31 -0400; I'd doubt it since it says IRIX XFS filesystem instead of just XFS filesystem.; /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00135.html (8,182 bytes)
13. Re: IRIX XFS filesystem denial of service attack (score: 1): Author: >; Date: 16 Apr 2002 16:40:00 -0500; hi HD - I don't believe that Linux is affected. I've been told that the Linux I/O path was written specifically to avoid this problem, and I have run some test cases from our original bug report, and; /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00136.html (8,452 bytes)
14. Re: IRIX XFS filesystem denial of service attack (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:32:38 -0500; Does this vulnerability affect the Linux XFS port? The XFS page has no information about this or whether there is a fix available: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/ -HD; /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00661.html (8,507 bytes)
15. IRIX XFS filesystem denial of service attack (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 14:49:34 -0700 (PDT); _____________________________________________________________________________ SGI Security Advisory ______________________________________________________________________________ - -- - -- Issue Spec; /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00677.html (23,633 bytes)
16. Re: IRIX XFS filesystem denial of service attack (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 13:55:35 -0500 (CDT); Wouldn't ulimit and or rlimits help mitigate this issue on linux systems? Thanks, Ron DuFresne ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity. It elimin; /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00678.html (9,283 bytes)
17. Re: IRIX XFS filesystem denial of service attack (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: 16 Apr 2002 16:28:31 -0400; I'd doubt it since it says IRIX XFS filesystem instead of just XFS filesystem.; /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00679.html (8,182 bytes)
18. Re: IRIX XFS filesystem denial of service attack (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: 16 Apr 2002 16:40:00 -0500; hi HD - I don't believe that Linux is affected. I've been told that the Linux I/O path was written specifically to avoid this problem, and I have run some test cases from our original bug report, and; /archives/xfs/2002-04/msg00680.html (8,452 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]