What exactly is your plans on integration of XFS with the official kernel and/or the major Linux dists? I'm a bit concerned about the following: We're currently using XFS on a 180Gb RAID volume, by t
Red Hat -- changed RedHat deserves the right to withhold from merging in a relatively intrusive patch. You don't just add complicated filesystems every day. We're currently using XFS on a 180Gb RAID
OK. [ ... ] Fair enough. Will you there be a new release any time soon? I'm currently using a patched version due to certain NFS client issues. Also, would it be possible to make it work properly al
Will you there be a new release any time soon? I'm currently using a patched version due to certain NFS client issues. Also, would it be possible to make it work properly along with devfs from Red Ha
They're plans are exactly what the Red Hat source said...they're working toward getting their code approved, for inclusion, by Linus Torvalds. Not much winds up in a distribution level kernel unless
Good! So what you are saying is that this has been changed since 1.0? I seem to remember that this wouldn't boot at all when I first installed it, and that installing devfs via "rescue mode" resolve
I use devfs (without devfsd), and XFS works fine (not that I have it on root, mind, I have XFS on /home and ReiserFS on everything else). Just a general comment, that XFS is rather invasive. It inclu
Um, you haven't actually seen this for yourself, have you? Not much goes into Debian (most that does is stuff that's already in the latest -pre, just backported by Xu), but RedHat is absolutely amazi
For XFS 1.0 / RH 7.1, we released our own version of devfsd, which was essentially Mandrake's patched devfsd, with some config file magic to try to handle /dev/mouse and /dev/cdrom transparently. I'm
What exactly is your plans on integration of XFS with the official kernel and/or the major Linux dists? I'm a bit concerned about the following: We're currently using XFS on a 180Gb RAID volume, by t
Red Hat -- changed RedHat deserves the right to withhold from merging in a relatively intrusive patch. You don't just add complicated filesystems every day. We're currently using XFS on a 180Gb RAID
OK. [ ... ] Fair enough. Will you there be a new release any time soon? I'm currently using a patched version due to certain NFS client issues. Also, would it be possible to make it work properly al
Will you there be a new release any time soon? I'm currently using a patched version due to certain NFS client issues. Also, would it be possible to make it work properly along with devfs from Red Ha
They're plans are exactly what the Red Hat source said...they're working toward getting their code approved, for inclusion, by Linus Torvalds. Not much winds up in a distribution level kernel unless
Good! So what you are saying is that this has been changed since 1.0? I seem to remember that this wouldn't boot at all when I first installed it, and that installing devfs via "rescue mode" resolve
I use devfs (without devfsd), and XFS works fine (not that I have it on root, mind, I have XFS on /home and ReiserFS on everything else). Just a general comment, that XFS is rather invasive. It inclu
Um, you haven't actually seen this for yourself, have you? Not much goes into Debian (most that does is stuff that's already in the latest -pre, just backported by Xu), but RedHat is absolutely amazi
For XFS 1.0 / RH 7.1, we released our own version of devfsd, which was essentially Mandrake's patched devfsd, with some config file magic to try to handle /dev/mouse and /dev/cdrom transparently. I'm