Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Kernel\s+Oops\s+\.\.\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Kernel\s+Oops\s+\.\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 58 ]

Total 58 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Kernel Oops ..... (score: 1): Author: "Michael Wahlbrink" <miw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 18:11:28 +0200; Hi, Bad news..... Ok, the Kernel compiled fine with kgcc ;-) and it runs longer under load then the other old kernel but i get an oops again...... :-( here it is! cu micha ksymoops 2.4.1 on i686 2.4.; /archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00003.html (12,831 bytes)
2. Re: Kernel Oops ..... (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 18:35:46 +0200 (CEST); I see you are using part of the syslog messages. Can you find the syslog initscript and add the -x option to it? By adding -x to syslog it will not try to interpret the oops. This might give better r; /archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00004.html (8,609 bytes)
3. Re: Kernel Oops ..... (score: 1): Author: "Michael Wahlbrink" <miw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 20:18:36 +0200; Ok its done! No problem, as standard Suse Installs an Memtest Bootimage...... ..... I let run memtest for 1pass with no errors so it seems, that the 256mb infineon module works correct. Perhaps it is; /archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00006.html (9,670 bytes)
4. Re: Kernel Oops ..... (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 20:35:28 +0200 (CEST); Nice. It could affect, compiling for i386 will always work, but compiling for athlon/duron will make it faster. I compile my kernel for athlon systems and I don't have problems. Do you have the lates; /archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00007.html (10,089 bytes)
5. Re: Kernel Oops ..... (score: 1): Author: "Michael Wahlbrink" <miw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 20:37:58 +0200; [...] But no my syslog doesnt start anymore its complainig about an unknown option -x ;-( cu micha Attachment: smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature; /archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00008.html (8,944 bytes)
6. Re: Kernel Oops ..... (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 20:44:48 +0200 (CEST); Oops! It seems that this is not supported under SuSE. It might be that SuSE uses another deamon for syslog. Ok skip that part.; /archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00009.html (9,070 bytes)
7. Re: Kernel Oops ..... (score: 1): Author: "Michael Wahlbrink" <miw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 20:44:51 +0200; No, Its one with the new SiS735 (ECS K7S5A)....... But I'll see if there is a new bios..... It's on the way cu michael Attachment: smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature; /archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00010.html (9,149 bytes)
8. Re: Kernel Oops ..... (score: 1): Author: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2001 05:53:06 +1000; klogd -x, not syslog -x.; /archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00012.html (8,632 bytes)
9. Re: Kernel Oops ..... (score: 1): Author: "Michael Wahlbrink" <miw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 22:08:08 +0200; Thanks, that works ;-) cu micha Attachment: smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature; /archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00013.html (8,827 bytes)
10. Re: Kernel Oops ..... (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 23:35:57 +0200 (CEST); Uhm, yes ... does almost right count ?; /archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00014.html (8,713 bytes)
11. Re: Kernel Oops ..... (score: 1): Author: "Michael Wahlbrink" <miw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 23:42:00 +0200; And here comes the next oops with newest bios and -x for klogd :-( cu michael ksymoops 2.4.1 on i686 2.4.10-pre2-xfs. Options used -V (default) -k /proc/ksyms (default) -l /proc/modules (default) -o; /archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00015.html (12,906 bytes)
12. Re: Kernel Oops ..... (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 23:50:26 +0200 (CEST); You are first that I see with a SiS 735 based motherboard so I have no clue how well it works within Linux. The performance and stability of this board is reported to be good. So I am assuming it wor; /archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00016.html (9,436 bytes)
13. Re: Kernel Oops ..... (score: 1): Author: "Michael Wahlbrink" <miw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2001 00:07:42 +0200; Ok, no problem ;-) I'll make my tests with ext2 to see if the kernel 'oopses' too......... And the PII is still compiling th xfs kernel.... cu michael Attachment: smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Crypto; /archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00017.html (9,774 bytes)
14. Re: Kernel Oops ..... (score: 1): Author: "Michael Wahlbrink" <miw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 23:22:54 +0200; Ok, I think I've found the error! :-)) I've made the tests also with ext2 and run into IO errors...... I checked the drives and burned my fingers...... The drives are getting to hot :-( So I installe; /archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00049.html (9,411 bytes)
15. Re: Kernel Oops ..... (score: 1): Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 09:02:20 +0200; from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A7357306; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 09:02:20 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Seth Mos <; /archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00058.html (10,441 bytes)
16. Re: Kernel Oops ..... (score: 1): Author: "Michael Wahlbrink" <miw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 10:18:09 +0200; I think it was the temperature, cause the SDRAM was checked one night long with memtest86 without errors, and also for a test replaced with other DIMMs which worked fine in another Mashine and are al; /archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00060.html (10,371 bytes)
17. Re: Kernel Oops ..... (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 18:11:28 +0200; Hi, Bad news..... Ok, the Kernel compiled fine with kgcc ;-) and it runs longer under load then the other old kernel but i get an oops again...... :-( here it is! cu micha ksymoops 2.4.1 on i686 2.4.; /archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00681.html (12,831 bytes)
18. Re: Kernel Oops ..... (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 18:35:46 +0200 (CEST); I see you are using part of the syslog messages. Can you find the syslog initscript and add the -x option to it? By adding -x to syslog it will not try to interpret the oops. This might give better r; /archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00682.html (8,609 bytes)
19. Re: Kernel Oops ..... (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 20:18:36 +0200; Ok its done! No problem, as standard Suse Installs an Memtest Bootimage...... ..... I let run memtest for 1pass with no errors so it seems, that the 256mb infineon module works correct. Perhaps it is; /archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00684.html (9,670 bytes)
20. Re: Kernel Oops ..... (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 20:35:28 +0200 (CEST); Nice. It could affect, compiling for i386 will always work, but compiling for athlon/duron will make it faster. I compile my kernel for athlon systems and I don't have problems. Do you have the lates; /archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00685.html (10,089 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]