Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LVM\/XFS\s+Bug\?\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. LVM/XFS Bug? (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 11:17:30 -0500 (CDT)
On the system I've been testing LVM+XFS with, I've run into a bit of a dilemma. If I try to resize the a volume more than once, I get the following error message: --begin problem-- [root@core /root]#
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00814.html (13,472 bytes)

2. Re: LVM/XFS Bug? (score: 1)
Author: ord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 13:44:28 -0500 (CDT)
Has ANYONE looked into this? It seems pretty serious. Anyone? -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00860.html (15,389 bytes)

3. Re: LVM/XFS Bug? (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 13:58:33 -0500
Not yet - patience, if this was a commercial release you would have to wait several months for a fix ;-) Steve
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00861.html (16,446 bytes)

4. Re: LVM/XFS Bug? (score: 1)
Author: ord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 14:18:21 -0500 (CDT)
Yeah..I know, but this seems pretty severe. Usually things of this severity seem to get talked about on the list immediately, so I didn't know if anyone was listening out there or not. Sorry for the
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00862.html (17,571 bytes)

5. Re: LVM/XFS Bug? (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 09:42:44 +0200 (CEST)
What kernel is this? The "official" LVM 1.0 uses LVM 0.9.1-beta6! I have a home-grown RedHat 7.0 with kernel 2.4.3-XFS plus LVM 0.9.1-beta7 (including kernel patch) and on this system it goes like th
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00877.html (13,773 bytes)

6. Re: LVM/XFS Bug? (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 09:46:41 +0200
I've had the same problem .. workaround : run an xfs_repair on it and it doesnt throw any errors. I tried this multiple times. the resize leave's the fs in a non consistent state... I think an umount
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00878.html (8,869 bytes)

7. Re: LVM/XFS Bug? (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 10:46:23 -0500 (CDT)
I've unmounted/remounted it and that doesn't fix crap. I'll try the xfs_repair, and while that COULD work, it's not a real fix, but at least it's a work around! Thanks a lot! -- Austin Gonyou Systems
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00886.html (9,647 bytes)

8. Re: LVM/XFS Bug? (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 10:48:20 -0500 (CDT)
Interesting. The kernel I'm using is the one from the devel tree. Very interesting. Perhaps this is scsi specific? -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00887.html (14,456 bytes)

9. Re: LVM/XFS Bug? (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 10:53:21 -0500 (CDT)
After running an xfs_repair, that FS seems to be all good in general now. I'm going to perform one more test. In this test I'll blow away the volume, recreate it as a 6GB volume, run xfs_repair immed
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00888.html (9,774 bytes)

10. Re: LVM/XFS Bug? (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 11:00:50 -0500 (CDT)
Ok, I ran the test and it still fails. xfs_repair must be run after growing the volume 1 time. While that saves me from having to worry about destroying my data, it's not a fully acceptable fix. I'll
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg00889.html (8,491 bytes)

11. LVM/XFS Bug? (score: 1)
Author: an <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 11:17:30 -0500 (CDT)
On the system I've been testing LVM+XFS with, I've run into a bit of a dilemma. If I try to resize the a volume more than once, I get the following error message: --begin problem-- [root@core /root]#
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg02178.html (13,472 bytes)

12. Re: LVM/XFS Bug? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 13:44:28 -0500 (CDT)
Has ANYONE looked into this? It seems pretty serious. Anyone? -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg02224.html (15,389 bytes)

13. Re: LVM/XFS Bug? (score: 1)
Author: <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 13:58:33 -0500
Not yet - patience, if this was a commercial release you would have to wait several months for a fix ;-) Steve
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg02225.html (16,446 bytes)

14. Re: LVM/XFS Bug? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 14:18:21 -0500 (CDT)
Yeah..I know, but this seems pretty severe. Usually things of this severity seem to get talked about on the list immediately, so I didn't know if anyone was listening out there or not. Sorry for the
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg02226.html (17,571 bytes)

15. Re: LVM/XFS Bug? (score: 1)
Author: .matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 09:42:44 +0200 (CEST)
What kernel is this? The "official" LVM 1.0 uses LVM 0.9.1-beta6! I have a home-grown RedHat 7.0 with kernel 2.4.3-XFS plus LVM 0.9.1-beta7 (including kernel patch) and on this system it goes like th
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg02241.html (13,773 bytes)

16. Re: LVM/XFS Bug? (score: 1)
Author: .Scharrlach@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 09:46:41 +0200
I've had the same problem .. workaround : run an xfs_repair on it and it doesnt throw any errors. I tried this multiple times. the resize leave's the fs in a non consistent state... I think an umount
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg02242.html (8,869 bytes)

17. Re: LVM/XFS Bug? (score: 1)
Author: schell <markh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 10:46:23 -0500 (CDT)
I've unmounted/remounted it and that doesn't fix crap. I'll try the xfs_repair, and while that COULD work, it's not a real fix, but at least it's a work around! Thanks a lot! -- Austin Gonyou Systems
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg02250.html (9,647 bytes)

18. Re: LVM/XFS Bug? (score: 1)
Author: <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 10:48:20 -0500 (CDT)
Interesting. The kernel I'm using is the one from the devel tree. Very interesting. Perhaps this is scsi specific? -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg02251.html (14,456 bytes)

19. Re: LVM/XFS Bug? (score: 1)
Author: <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 10:53:21 -0500 (CDT)
After running an xfs_repair, that FS seems to be all good in general now. I'm going to perform one more test. In this test I'll blow away the volume, recreate it as a 6GB volume, run xfs_repair immed
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg02252.html (9,774 bytes)

20. Re: LVM/XFS Bug? (score: 1)
Author: <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 11:00:50 -0500 (CDT)
Ok, I ran the test and it still fails. xfs_repair must be run after growing the volume 1 time. While that saves me from having to worry about destroying my data, it's not a fully acceptable fix. I'll
/archives/xfs/2001-05/msg02253.html (8,491 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu