Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LVM\s+and\s+XFS\s+cannot\s+set\s+blocksize\s+on\s+block\s+device\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LVM\s+and\s+XFS\s+cannot\s+set\s+blocksize\s+on\s+block\s+device\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LVM and XFS cannot set blocksize on block device (score: 1): Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:28:10 +1000; Chris Wedgwood wrote: On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 08:23:43PM +1000, Tim Shimmin wrote: I'll have a look soon at passing the mkfs.xfs -s option thru to libxfs which is consistent with the existing code. (; /archives/xfs/2006-10/msg00003.html (9,842 bytes)
2. Re: LVM and XFS cannot set blocksize on block device (score: 1): Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 17:35:39 +1000; Shailendra Tripathi wrote: Thanks for the reply. The "-s size=4096" helped I was able to create the file system, then mount it and use it. I did however get a warning still about "cannot set blocksiz; /archives/xfs/2006-10/msg00019.html (15,375 bytes)
3. WINNER (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 15:36:49 -0500; We are currently running SLES 10 on this box. I have called IBM and they submitted a bug report to Novell and LTC Bugzilla 28003. Is this all we need to do to get the patch into maybe SLES 10 SP1? th; /archives/xfs/2006-10/msg00076.html (16,117 bytes)
4. e raid 5 with XFS causing strange lockup problems (score: 1): Author: mou@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:59:14 +1000; a software raid 5. I am doing this with a PCI controller with 4 SATA drives attached to it. When I play my music over the network through Samba from the raid volume my audio clien; /archives/xfs/2006-10/msg00116.html (8,983 bytes)
5. dle fails if the path is a directory (score: 1): Author: America Online <security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:28:10 +1000; pany Based on Chinese and African textile and fabric material in Hong kong ,I'm in search for a trustworthy representativ; /archives/xfs/2006-10/msg00380.html (9,842 bytes)
6. inode hashes to radix trees (score: 1): Author: ner <dgc@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 17:35:39 +1000; /archives/xfs/2006-10/msg00396.html (15,375 bytes)
7. s/libxfs fix (score: 1): Author: ward.dept@xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 15:36:49 -0500; Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 04:34:03PM +1000, Timothy Shimmin wrote: Request for review of libxfs patch. .... Index: xfspr; /archives/xfs/2006-10/msg00453.html (16,117 bytes)
8. 3] corrupts startoff (score: 1): Author: Williamson" <notian@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:59:14 +1000; h; /archives/xfs/2006-10/msg00493.html (8,983 bytes)
9. LVM and XFS cannot set blocksize on block device (score: 1): Author: Rene Salmon <rsalmon@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:11:48 -0500; I am trying to create an xfs file system on and LVM logical volume. the actual physical drive has blocks or sectors of 4096. when I try to make the xfs file system on top of LVM I get this message:; /archives/xfs/2006-09/msg00137.html (9,625 bytes)
10. Re: LVM and XFS cannot set blocksize on block device (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:17:37 -0700; does "-s size=4096" help?; /archives/xfs/2006-09/msg00139.html (8,426 bytes)
11. Re: LVM and XFS cannot set blocksize on block device (score: 1): Author: Rene Salmon <rsalmon@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:58:28 -0500; Thanks for the reply. The "-s size=4096" helped I was able to create the file system, then mount it and use it. I did however get a warning still about "cannot set blocksize on block device". Everyt; /archives/xfs/2006-09/msg00140.html (10,634 bytes)
12. Re: LVM and XFS cannot set blocksize on block device (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:40:53 -0700; I don't know much about the LVM code, my guess is that ioctl(... ,BLKBSZSET, ...) is failing, strace would confirm this. What does: blockdev --getbsz /dev/vg_u00/lv_u00 say? If mkfs.xfs is trying to; /archives/xfs/2006-09/msg00146.html (9,397 bytes)
13. Re: LVM and XFS cannot set blocksize on block device (score: 1): Author: Shailendra Tripathi <stripathi@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:25:09 +0530; Thanks for the reply. The "-s size=4096" helped I was able to create the file system, then mount it and use it. I did however get a warning still about "cannot set blocksize on block device". I don't; /archives/xfs/2006-09/msg00150.html (11,239 bytes)
14. Re: LVM and XFS cannot set blocksize on block device (score: 1): Author: Rene Salmon <rsalmon@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:16:44 -0500; Thanks for the replies. The block size of my LV is indeed 4096 helix-priv:~ # blockdev --getbsz /dev/vg_u00/lv_u00 4096 I can mount and use the xfs file system no problems. I have even tested extend; /archives/xfs/2006-09/msg00151.html (12,390 bytes)
15. Re: LVM and XFS cannot set blocksize on block device (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:48:37 -0500; Yep, this looks to me like an oversight when the larger-sector-size support was added. Seems like if the device can't be set to a smaller sector size than X, then the tools should run as if a sector; /archives/xfs/2006-09/msg00152.html (10,007 bytes)
16. Re: LVM and XFS cannot set blocksize on block device (score: 1): Author: Tim Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:23:43 +1000; Shailendra Tripathi wrote: Thanks for the reply. The "-s size=4096" helped I was able to create the file system, then mount it and use it. I did however get a warning still about "cannot set blocksiz; /archives/xfs/2006-09/msg00157.html (10,969 bytes)
17. Re: LVM and XFS cannot set blocksize on block device (score: 1): Author: Tim Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:33:47 +1000; Hi Rene, Rene Salmon wrote: Should I report this as a bug? Well I know it now :) but it is good to have a record of it. If so Can someone point me to the bugzilla page or something of the sorts? http; /archives/xfs/2006-09/msg00158.html (9,998 bytes)
18. Re: LVM and XFS cannot set blocksize on block device (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:32:18 -0700; (following up on something mentioned off the list) When you do this change please consider *not* making the code fallback to a different blocksize if the ioctl fails when "-s size=" is given. The log; /archives/xfs/2006-09/msg00161.html (9,672 bytes)
19. LVM and XFS cannot set blocksize on block device (score: 1): Author: Rene Salmon <rsalmon@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:11:48 -0500; I am trying to create an xfs file system on and LVM logical volume. the actual physical drive has blocks or sectors of 4096. when I try to make the xfs file system on top of LVM I get this message:; /archives/xfs/2006-09/msg00305.html (9,625 bytes)
20. Re: LVM and XFS cannot set blocksize on block device (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:17:37 -0700; does "-s size=4096" help?; /archives/xfs/2006-09/msg00307.html (8,426 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]