Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Linux\/XFS\s+equivalents\s+of\s+defrag\,\s+chkdsk\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Linux\/XFS\s+equivalents\s+of\s+defrag\,\s+chkdsk\?\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Linux/XFS equivalents of defrag, chkdsk? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:24:22 -0700 (PDT); I want to ensure that my filesystems are always optimized as well as be able to detect any possible filesystem-level issues ahead of time. I looked around the command line switches and manpages for t; /archives/xfs/2004-08/msg00186.html (7,953 bytes)
2. Re: Linux/XFS equivalents of defrag, chkdsk? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:44:30 -0700; yes and no xfs_repair can detect and repair damage for file-systems which are *not* in use xfs_fsr tries to reduce the fragmention of files there are not really the sane and windows chkdsk or defrag; /archives/xfs/2004-08/msg00187.html (8,823 bytes)
3. Re: Linux/XFS equivalents of defrag, chkdsk? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 14:45:59 -0600; --On Sunday, August 29, 2004 13:24 -0700 mike <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: I want to ensure that my filesystems are always optimized as well as be able to detect any possible filesystem-level issues ahea; /archives/xfs/2004-08/msg00188.html (10,120 bytes)
4. Re: Linux/XFS equivalents of defrag, chkdsk? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:47:15 -0700 (PDT); first off, thanks for the reply. On Sun, 29 Aug 2004, Chris Wedgwood wrote: On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 01:24:22PM -0700, mike wrote: Are there Linux equivalents for the XFS filesystem for chkdsk (fsck -; /archives/xfs/2004-08/msg00189.html (10,710 bytes)
5. Re: Linux/XFS equivalents of defrag, chkdsk? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:24:47 -0800; XFS does much more internal checking then other filesystems. xfs_fsr runs on mounted filesystems, but its rarly necessary. as for checking, windows can't check a filesystem which is in use either, it; /archives/xfs/2004-08/msg00190.html (9,409 bytes)
6. Re: Linux/XFS equivalents of defrag, chkdsk? (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 14:49:15 -0700; how can you find something BEFORE it happens? if it's BEFORE then nothing has gone wrong yet windows can't do a 100% check on a live fs last i checked, in suck cases it actually will do the check on; /archives/xfs/2004-08/msg00191.html (9,220 bytes)
7. Linux/XFS equivalents of defrag, chkdsk? (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:24:22 -0700 (PDT); I want to ensure that my filesystems are always optimized as well as be able to detect any possible filesystem-level issues ahead of time. I looked around the command line switches and manpages for t; /archives/xfs/2004-08/msg00397.html (7,953 bytes)
8. Re: Linux/XFS equivalents of defrag, chkdsk? (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:44:30 -0700; yes and no xfs_repair can detect and repair damage for file-systems which are *not* in use xfs_fsr tries to reduce the fragmention of files there are not really the sane and windows chkdsk or defrag; /archives/xfs/2004-08/msg00398.html (8,823 bytes)
9. Re: Linux/XFS equivalents of defrag, chkdsk? (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 14:45:59 -0600; --On Sunday, August 29, 2004 13:24 -0700 mike <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: I want to ensure that my filesystems are always optimized as well as be able to detect any possible filesystem-level issues ahea; /archives/xfs/2004-08/msg00399.html (10,120 bytes)
10. Re: Linux/XFS equivalents of defrag, chkdsk? (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:47:15 -0700 (PDT); first off, thanks for the reply. On Sun, 29 Aug 2004, Chris Wedgwood wrote: On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 01:24:22PM -0700, mike wrote: Are there Linux equivalents for the XFS filesystem for chkdsk (fsck -; /archives/xfs/2004-08/msg00400.html (10,710 bytes)
11. Re: Linux/XFS equivalents of defrag, chkdsk? (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:24:47 -0800; XFS does much more internal checking then other filesystems. xfs_fsr runs on mounted filesystems, but its rarly necessary. as for checking, windows can't check a filesystem which is in use either, it; /archives/xfs/2004-08/msg00401.html (9,409 bytes)
12. Re: Linux/XFS equivalents of defrag, chkdsk? (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 14:49:15 -0700; how can you find something BEFORE it happens? if it's BEFORE then nothing has gone wrong yet windows can't do a 100% check on a live fs last i checked, in suck cases it actually will do the check on; /archives/xfs/2004-08/msg00402.html (9,220 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]