Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+files\s+on\s+xfs\s+ftp\s+site\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+files\s+on\s+xfs\s+ftp\s+site\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Re: New files on xfs ftp site (score: 1): Author: Jochen Scharrlach <Jochen.Scharrlach@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 10:10:00 +0200 (CEST); Maybe I miss something very obvious, but I'm a bit confused, esp. I don't know what you exactly mean with "they do not contain cvs files": - are these Patches simply XFS-1.0-for-2.4.5? - are they som; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00001.html (8,447 bytes)
2. Re: New files on xfs ftp site (score: 1): Author: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <marcelo.magallon@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 14:25:55 +0200; It's taken off the CVS tree and diff'ed against a fresh 2.4.5 tree. It applies cleanly (just checked this to be sure). AFAICT (don't take my word for this, I use neither RH nor the SGI release) the; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00003.html (8,075 bytes)
3. Re: New files on xfs ftp site (score: 1): Author: ctooley@xxxxxxxx; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 08:25:22 -0500; So if I want to upgrade to 2.4.5 via building a kernel RPM (I know this seems odd, but I've got 4 machines running XFS and would just like to keep them consistent) what all would I have to apply to 2; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00005.html (8,249 bytes)
4. Re: New files on xfs ftp site (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 12:37:05 -0500; The new files are as you put it 'bleeding edge cvs code', which happens to be a lot more stable than the 1.0 release was, pretty much everything which has happened to the code base since then has bee; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00014.html (9,230 bytes)
5. Re: New files on xfs ftp site (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 15:48:51 -0500; How good are you with RPM? The spec file for the kernel rpm is from redhat and has a couple of hundred patches it applies to the kernel before building it. Some of these patches are necessary if you; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00060.html (8,182 bytes)
6. Re: New files on xfs ftp site (score: 1): Author: Jochen Scharrlach <Jochen.Scharrlach@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 10:10:00 +0200 (CEST); Maybe I miss something very obvious, but I'm a bit confused, esp. I don't know what you exactly mean with "they do not contain cvs files": - are these Patches simply XFS-1.0-for-2.4.5? - are they som; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01171.html (8,447 bytes)
7. Re: New files on xfs ftp site (score: 1): Author: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <marcelo.magallon@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 14:25:55 +0200; It's taken off the CVS tree and diff'ed against a fresh 2.4.5 tree. It applies cleanly (just checked this to be sure). AFAICT (don't take my word for this, I use neither RH nor the SGI release) the; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01173.html (8,075 bytes)
8. Re: New files on xfs ftp site (score: 1): Author: ctooley@xxxxxxxx; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 08:25:22 -0500; So if I want to upgrade to 2.4.5 via building a kernel RPM (I know this seems odd, but I've got 4 machines running XFS and would just like to keep them consistent) what all would I have to apply to 2; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01175.html (8,249 bytes)
9. Re: New files on xfs ftp site (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 12:37:05 -0500; The new files are as you put it 'bleeding edge cvs code', which happens to be a lot more stable than the 1.0 release was, pretty much everything which has happened to the code base since then has bee; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01184.html (9,230 bytes)
10. Re: New files on xfs ftp site (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 15:48:51 -0500; How good are you with RPM? The spec file for the kernel rpm is from redhat and has a couple of hundred patches it applies to the kernel before building it. Some of these patches are necessary if you; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01230.html (8,182 bytes)
11. New files on xfs ftp site (score: 1): Author: ord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 18:12:51 -0500; I just pushed out some patches to the xfs ftp site on oss.sgi.com, I could not reach linux-xfs.sgi.com, so that site is not updated. In the cmd_tars directory are tar files of the latest source of th; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg01351.html (6,696 bytes)
12. New files on xfs ftp site (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 18:12:51 -0500; I just pushed out some patches to the xfs ftp site on oss.sgi.com, I could not reach linux-xfs.sgi.com, so that site is not updated. In the cmd_tars directory are tar files of the latest source of th; /archives/xfs/2001-05/msg02715.html (6,696 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]