Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Performance\s+problems\s+with\s+millions\s+of\s+inodes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Performance\s+problems\s+with\s+millions\s+of\s+inodes\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. Performance problems with millions of inodes (score: 1): Author: Christoph Litauer <litauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:43:23 +0200; sorry if this has been asked before, I am new to this mailing list. I didn't find any hints in the FAQ or by googling ... I have a backup server driving two kinds of backup software: bacula and back; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00321.html (9,538 bytes)
2. Re: Performance problems with millions of inodes (score: 1): Author: Christoph Litauer <litauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:46:30 +0200; Christoph Litauer schrieb: sorry if this has been asked before, I am new to this mailing list. I didn't find any hints in the FAQ or by googling ... I have a backup server driving two kinds of backup; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00322.html (10,757 bytes)
3. Re: Performance problems with millions of inodes (score: 1): Author: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:02:22 +0200; Le Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:46:30 +0200 Christoph Litauer <litauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait: Maybe you should try to add a "nobarrier" option at mount on the slowest machine. Barriers can slow down oper; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00323.html (8,533 bytes)
4. Re: Performance problems with millions of inodes (score: 1): Author: Mark <musicman529@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:00:50 -0700 (PDT); What type of RAID? If striping is involved, perhaps you should investigate the "su" and "sw" suboptions. I also found some performance improvement with "-l lazy-count=1", although you may not wish to; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00324.html (8,781 bytes)
5. Re: Performance problems with millions of inodes (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:12:10 +1000; Certain will be. You've got about 3 AGs that are holding inodes, so that's probably 35M+ inodes per AG. With the way allocation works, it's probably doing a dual-traversal of the AGI btree to find a; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00325.html (11,109 bytes)
6. Re: Performance problems with millions of inodes (score: 1): Author: Christoph Litauer <litauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:29:08 +0200; Dave Chinner schrieb: On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 04:43:23PM +0200, Christoph Litauer wrote: Hi, sorry if this has been asked before, I am new to this mailing list. I didn't find any hints in the FAQ or; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00343.html (12,297 bytes)
7. Re: Performance problems with millions of inodes (score: 1): Author: Christoph Litauer <litauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:29:42 +0200; Emmanuel Florac schrieb: Le Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:46:30 +0200 Christoph Litauer <litauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait: Maybe the 143 million inodes cause this effect? Any idea how to avoid it? Maybe you; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00356.html (9,560 bytes)
8. Performance problems with millions of inodes (score: 1): Author: Christoph Litauer <litauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:43:23 +0200; sorry if this has been asked before, I am new to this mailing list. I didn't find any hints in the FAQ or by googling ... I have a backup server driving two kinds of backup software: bacula and back; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00781.html (9,538 bytes)
9. Re: Performance problems with millions of inodes (score: 1): Author: Christoph Litauer <litauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:46:30 +0200; Christoph Litauer schrieb: sorry if this has been asked before, I am new to this mailing list. I didn't find any hints in the FAQ or by googling ... I have a backup server driving two kinds of backup; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00782.html (10,757 bytes)
10. Re: Performance problems with millions of inodes (score: 1): Author: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:02:22 +0200; Le Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:46:30 +0200 Christoph Litauer <litauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait: Maybe you should try to add a "nobarrier" option at mount on the slowest machine. Barriers can slow down oper; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00783.html (8,533 bytes)
11. Re: Performance problems with millions of inodes (score: 1): Author: Mark <musicman529@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:00:50 -0700 (PDT); What type of RAID? If striping is involved, perhaps you should investigate the "su" and "sw" suboptions. I also found some performance improvement with "-l lazy-count=1", although you may not wish to; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00784.html (8,781 bytes)
12. Re: Performance problems with millions of inodes (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:12:10 +1000; Certain will be. You've got about 3 AGs that are holding inodes, so that's probably 35M+ inodes per AG. With the way allocation works, it's probably doing a dual-traversal of the AGI btree to find a; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00785.html (11,109 bytes)
13. Re: Performance problems with millions of inodes (score: 1): Author: Christoph Litauer <litauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:29:08 +0200; Dave Chinner schrieb: On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 04:43:23PM +0200, Christoph Litauer wrote: Hi, sorry if this has been asked before, I am new to this mailing list. I didn't find any hints in the FAQ or; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00803.html (12,297 bytes)
14. Re: Performance problems with millions of inodes (score: 1): Author: Christoph Litauer <litauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:29:42 +0200; Emmanuel Florac schrieb: Le Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:46:30 +0200 Christoph Litauer <litauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait: Maybe the 143 million inodes cause this effect? Any idea how to avoid it? Maybe you; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00816.html (9,560 bytes)
15. Performance problems with millions of inodes (score: 1): Author: Christoph Litauer <litauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:43:23 +0200; Hi, sorry if this has been asked before, I am new to this mailing list. I didn't find any hints in the FAQ or by googling ... I have a backup server driving two kinds of backup software: bacula and b; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg01241.html (9,258 bytes)
16. Re: Performance problems with millions of inodes (score: 1): Author: Christoph Litauer <litauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:46:30 +0200; Christoph Litauer schrieb: Hi, sorry if this has been asked before, I am new to this mailing list. I didn't find any hints in the FAQ or by googling ... I have a backup server driving two kinds of ba; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg01242.html (10,581 bytes)
17. Re: Performance problems with millions of inodes (score: 1): Author: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:02:22 +0200; Le Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:46:30 +0200 Christoph Litauer <litauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait: Maybe you should try to add a "nobarrier" option at mount on the slowest machine. Barriers can slow down operat; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg01243.html (8,603 bytes)
18. Re: Performance problems with millions of inodes (score: 1): Author: Mark <musicman529@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:00:50 -0700 (PDT); What type of RAID? If striping is involved, perhaps you should investigate the "su" and "sw" suboptions. I also found some performance improvement with "-l lazy-count=1", although you may not wish to; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg01244.html (8,812 bytes)
19. Re: Performance problems with millions of inodes (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:12:10 +1000; Certain will be. You've got about 3 AGs that are holding inodes, so that's probably 35M+ inodes per AG. With the way allocation works, it's probably doing a dual-traversal of the AGI btree to find a; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg01245.html (11,153 bytes)
20. Re: Performance problems with millions of inodes (score: 1): Author: Christoph Litauer <litauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:29:08 +0200; sorry if this has been asked before, I am new to this mailing list. I didn't find any hints in the FAQ or by googling ... I have a backup server driving two kinds of backup software: bacula and backu; /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg01263.html (12,329 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]