Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Prerelease\s+0\.10\.1\s+images\s+now\s+available\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Prerelease\s+0\.10\.1\s+images\s+now\s+available\.\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Prerelease 0.10.1 images now available. (score: 1): Author: cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 01:03:16 -0600; Seems like it was just yesterday that that 0.10 images came out... ohhh it was. :-) Well several bugs have been fixed over the past few day so guess it is time to update things. The most significant; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00494.html (9,245 bytes)
2. Re: Prerelease 0.10.1 images now available. (score: 1): Author: Bryan-TheBS-Smith <thebs@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 10:37:49 -0500; _Dumb_ question: Doesn't compiling on an older platform take issue (or not take advantage of) the newer GLibC and other capabilities? -- TheBS -- Bryan "TheBS" Smith chat:thebs413 @AOL/MSN/Yahoo Engi; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00503.html (8,651 bytes)
3. Re: Prerelease 0.10.1 images now available. (score: 1): Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 09:59:48 -0600; This shouldn't change the interaction of the kernel and glibc, unless there is a type change between the two versions. But hey lets find out.... that is the reason these kernel are labeled test. -- R; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00504.html (8,919 bytes)
4. Re: Prerelease 0.10.1 images now available. (score: 1): Author: Ajay Shekhawat <ajay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 14:35:42 -0500; . . . . I've successfully patched the 2.4.3 kernel with these patches (almost everything worked, except for a few minor rejects). So far, it seems to be OK. NFS serving of XFS works, and I'm beating; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00511.html (8,809 bytes)
5. Re: Prerelease 0.10.1 images now available. (score: 1): Author: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 14:45:42 -0500 (EST); Are you running on any SMP machines? I had to add the 'noapic' option to my server running the 2.4.2-xfs kernel, otherwise eth0 disappeared due to lost interrupts after very little activity. -- Joshu; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00512.html (8,530 bytes)
6. Re: Prerelease 0.10.1 images now available. (score: 1): Author: Ajay Shekhawat <ajay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 15:17:47 -0500; Yes, it is an SMP system, with dual P-II 450MHz CPUs on an ASUS P2B-DS motherboard. I didn't have to use the "noapic" option, but maybe I should have tried that with my 2.4.2-xfs when I encountered t; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00513.html (9,608 bytes)
7. Re: Prerelease 0.10.1 images now available. (score: 1): Author: Ajay Shekhawat <ajay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 19:23:55 -0500; The NFSD crashed after about 4 hours of relentless hammering. The ksymoops outputs are attached below, in case anyone is interested. There were several "oops"; one set from the KNFSD, and the other w; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg00527.html (9,503 bytes)
8. Prerelease 0.10.1 images now available. (score: 1): Author: cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 01:03:16 -0600; Seems like it was just yesterday that that 0.10 images came out... ohhh it was. :-) Well several bugs have been fixed over the past few day so guess it is time to update things. The most significant; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg01027.html (9,245 bytes)
9. Re: Prerelease 0.10.1 images now available. (score: 1): Author: Bryan-TheBS-Smith <thebs@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 10:37:49 -0500; _Dumb_ question: Doesn't compiling on an older platform take issue (or not take advantage of) the newer GLibC and other capabilities? -- TheBS -- Bryan "TheBS" Smith chat:thebs413 @AOL/MSN/Yahoo Engi; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg01036.html (8,651 bytes)
10. Re: Prerelease 0.10.1 images now available. (score: 1): Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 09:59:48 -0600; This shouldn't change the interaction of the kernel and glibc, unless there is a type change between the two versions. But hey lets find out.... that is the reason these kernel are labeled test. -- R; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg01037.html (8,919 bytes)
11. Re: Prerelease 0.10.1 images now available. (score: 1): Author: Ajay Shekhawat <ajay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 14:35:42 -0500; . . . . I've successfully patched the 2.4.3 kernel with these patches (almost everything worked, except for a few minor rejects). So far, it seems to be OK. NFS serving of XFS works, and I'm beating; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg01044.html (8,809 bytes)
12. Re: Prerelease 0.10.1 images now available. (score: 1): Author: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 14:45:42 -0500 (EST); Are you running on any SMP machines? I had to add the 'noapic' option to my server running the 2.4.2-xfs kernel, otherwise eth0 disappeared due to lost interrupts after very little activity. -- Joshu; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg01045.html (8,530 bytes)
13. Re: Prerelease 0.10.1 images now available. (score: 1): Author: Ajay Shekhawat <ajay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 15:17:47 -0500; Yes, it is an SMP system, with dual P-II 450MHz CPUs on an ASUS P2B-DS motherboard. I didn't have to use the "noapic" option, but maybe I should have tried that with my 2.4.2-xfs when I encountered t; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg01046.html (9,608 bytes)
14. Re: Prerelease 0.10.1 images now available. (score: 1): Author: Ajay Shekhawat <ajay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 19:23:55 -0500; The NFSD crashed after about 4 hours of relentless hammering. The ksymoops outputs are attached below, in case anyone is interested. There were several "oops"; one set from the KNFSD, and the other w; /archives/xfs/2001-03/msg01060.html (9,503 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]