Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Processes\s+stuck\s+in\s+D\s+state\.\.\s*$/: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

1. Processes stuck in D state.. (score: 1)
Author: Gordon Henderson <gordon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 09:03:26 +0100 (BST)
I am running a few production servers with XFS now, but I'm a little concerned... (as I'm seeing some problems) Anyway, I'm using the -ac4 patches to 2.4.21 with the 1.2 release of the xfsprogs and w
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00037.html (9,585 bytes)

2. Re: Processes stuck in D state.. (score: 1)
Author: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 21:03:19 +1000
Do not blame XFS for this problem, it is almost certainly an NFS problem. When an NFS mount marked 'hard' stops responding, any process that accesses the NFS mount will hang in D state. If those proc
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00038.html (9,884 bytes)

3. Re: Processes stuck in D state.. (score: 1)
Author: Michael Loftis <mloftis@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 09:57:46 -0600
Yah for production go with a kernel as close to stock as posible. Avoid anything by redhat in the 2.4.20 series, and you should be fine. In other words go get a fresh treee, patch in ONLY the XFS stu
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00040.html (11,327 bytes)

4. Re: Processes stuck in D state.. (score: 1)
Author: "Simon Matter" <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 21:15:33 +0200 (CEST)
I don't agree. I'm using XFS enabled RedHat for a long time now on several servers with great success. Are the problem you're talking about always NFS related? That's the only thing I'm not using al
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00041.html (12,545 bytes)

5. Re: Processes stuck in D state.. (score: 1)
Author: Michael Loftis <mloftis@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 13:25:40 -0600
The whole redhat 2.4.20 kernel is crap. I've had a number of boxes lockup on it. Initially it was the firewall, but then at home I've had other boxes lock up under load with it. 2.4.20-19.x got a lit
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00042.html (11,074 bytes)

6. Re: Processes stuck in D state.. (score: 1)
Author: "Simon Matter" <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 21:36:52 +0200 (CEST)
I have my own patched set of 2.4.20-19.9.SGI_XFS_1.2.0 kernels which perform very well on several servers from RedHat 7.2 to RedHat 9. One RedHat 9 box is a dual Xeon 2.8G, 4G ram and lot's of disks
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00043.html (12,128 bytes)

7. Re: Processes stuck in D state.. (score: 1)
Author: Michael Loftis <mloftis@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 14:07:09 -0600
RedHat directly. Tried i386 and i686 kernels for systems. Both had the same problem. Symptoms were either lockup of the machine with the IDE HDD activity light stuck on but absolutely no other respon
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00044.html (11,615 bytes)

8. Re: Processes stuck in D state.. (score: 1)
Author: Michael Loftis <mloftis@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 14:11:25 -0600
To be fair I haven't tested the .9, just 7 and 8. But they both are suck on all my hardware :)
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00045.html (9,871 bytes)

9. Re: Processes stuck in D state.. (score: 1)
Author: "Scott Fagg" <scott.fagg@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 08:22:47 +1000
I'm using rh7.3, rh8.0 and rh9.0 8 and 9 are running stock 2.4.21 + xfs patches and i'm getting fs corruption 7.3 is running the sgi-supplied redhat installer, and it runs flawlessly Scott Fagg <scot
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00049.html (9,382 bytes)

10. Re: Processes stuck in D state.. (score: 1)
Author: Gordon Henderson <gordon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 00:13:06 +0100 (BST)
Maybe my original email was unclear, but this is an NFS server, not a client. Why would an NFS exported filesystem hang xfsdump? (or even du -k ?) ie. 1149 ? D 2:21 xfsdump -F -J -l 1 - /dev/md4 This
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00050.html (9,511 bytes)

11. Re: Processes stuck in D state.. (score: 1)
Author: Christian Guggenberger <christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 07 Aug 2003 01:33:17 +0200
I'm running two BIG NFS Servers with xfs only (Debian 3.0, too + recent xfsprogs...). I'm using them since 2.4.19-cvs, and never ever had stuck D states on the Server. But I've been bitten by stuck D
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00051.html (10,894 bytes)

12. Re: Processes stuck in D state.. (score: 1)
Author: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 10:45:47 +1000
From your original mail: All operations that require filesystem locks. They are queued up behind some task that has grabbed a filesystem lock and is hung, IOW these tasks are innocent victims of the
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00052.html (9,724 bytes)

13. Re: Processes stuck in D state.. (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 06 Aug 2003 22:03:34 -0500
This combination of code may be the problem - ac patches and xfs, the version of xfs in Alan's tree probably has had less testing than any other combination out there. It has almost certainly degener
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00054.html (9,835 bytes)

14. Re: Processes stuck in D state.. (score: 1)
Author: Gordon Henderson <gordon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 09:26:18 +0100 (BST)
OK. I can't easilly do this - it's a production box and they won't afford me the dowtime. I'll try the latest patches against a 2.4.21 kernel (but I'm not sure if I need the AC patches or not with .2
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00055.html (9,704 bytes)

15. Re: Processes stuck in D state.. (score: 1)
Author: yocum@xxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 07:32:45 -0500
Betcha a nickel there's an automount process that's in uninterruptable sleep, too. 'service autofs restart' will get autofs going again with a duplicate process, but the original hung automount will
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00056.html (9,994 bytes)

16. Re: Processes stuck in D state.. (score: 1)
Author: Nicolas Kowalski <Nicolas.Kowalski@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 13:07:49 +0200
[...] For information, I have setup a Debian Woody + SGI-XFS (CVS-2003-08-07_05:00_UTC) - without any third-party patches - fileserver with software raid0 devices (2*36Gb SCSI disks, symbios driver)
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00057.html (9,612 bytes)

17. Re: Processes stuck in D state.. (score: 1)
Author: Gordon Henderson <gordon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 14:33:14 +0100 (BST)
Bet you a euro there aren't ;-) There are no automount processes, and no automounter at all - it's not compiled into the kernel. % fgrep -i auto .config CONFIG_IDEDMA_PCI_AUTO=y CONFIG_IDEDMA_AUTO=y
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00058.html (9,896 bytes)

18. Re: Processes stuck in D state.. (score: 1)
Author: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 23:50:02 +1000
XFS 1.n are full blown XFS releases, typically involving an installer to go in front of a Redhat install. Wild suggestion. Read the README. 2.4.21-2003-07-07_02:01_UTC is an old patch set, 2.4.21 is
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00059.html (8,774 bytes)

19. Processes stuck in D state.. (score: 1)
Author: Gordon Henderson <gordon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 09:03:26 +0100 (BST)
I am running a few production servers with XFS now, but I'm a little concerned... (as I'm seeing some problems) Anyway, I'm using the -ac4 patches to 2.4.21 with the 1.2 release of the xfsprogs and w
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00389.html (9,585 bytes)

20. Re: Processes stuck in D state.. (score: 1)
Author: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 21:03:19 +1000
Do not blame XFS for this problem, it is almost certainly an NFS problem. When an NFS mount marked 'hard' stops responding, any process that accesses the NFS mount will hang in D state. If those proc
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00390.html (9,884 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu