Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Question\s+related\s+to\s+XFS\s+sync\s+\,\s+especially\s+fsync\s*$/: 42 ]

Total 42 documents matching your query.

1. Question related to XFS sync , especially fsync (score: 1)
Author: "Gopala Krishna" <gopalakrishna.n.m@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:44:22 +0530
I am seeing some strange problem with XFS and would like to know the expected behavior and if it is faulty is there any patches to resolve the problem. Problem: == Basically I am extracting metadata
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00044.html (11,395 bytes)

2. Re: Question related to XFS sync , especially fsync (score: 1)
Author: "Gopala Krishna" <gopalakrishna.n.m@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:54:26 +0530
My system information: -bash-3.00# uname -a Linux XXXXX #1 SMP Thu May 17 14:00:09 UTC 2007 ia64 ia64 ia64 GNU/Linux -bash-3.00# cat /etc/issue Welcome to SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 SP1 (ia64)
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00045.html (12,948 bytes)

3. Re: Question related to XFS sync , especially fsync (score: 1)
Author: "Gopala Krishna" <gopalakrishna.n.m@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:55:50 +0530
One more information: XFS is not a root file system , but EXT3 is a root file system. Thanks, Gopal. [[HTML alternate version deleted]]
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00046.html (13,915 bytes)

4. Re: Question related to XFS sync , especially fsync (score: 1)
Author: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:06:32 +0100
sync is guaranteed to flush all metadata. But it has other problems like livelocks. to ensure all metadata I suspect it's flushed to the log only. You could probably write some other metadata until t
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00048.html (10,533 bytes)

5. Re: Question related to XFS sync , especially fsync (score: 1)
Author: Olaf Frączyk <olaf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:32:32 +0100
The metadata are put in log. So they are on disk. Just not in the place you expect them to find. At remount the log is replayed and the metadata are in the place where you expect them to be. And it d
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00049.html (10,584 bytes)

6. Re: Question related to XFS sync , especially fsync (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:55:53 -0800
it's probably in the log if you must poke about under the fs like this, try doing freeze/unfreeze (this is what i suggested to the grub people years ago, but i'm not sure it ever made it upstream)
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00052.html (9,807 bytes)

7. Re: Question related to XFS sync , especially fsync (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:42:45 +1100
How are you finding and reading the inode off disk? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00054.html (10,842 bytes)

8. Re: Question related to XFS sync , especially fsync (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:14:12 +0530
Hi All, Thanks a lot for your response. I never thought it might be in a log and not flushed to disk. Very good clue. Good comment. Agreed : -). I have lot of code getting in to that. To explain that
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00058.html (13,977 bytes)

9. Re: Question related to XFS sync , especially fsync (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:18:04 -0600
Can I ask why you are doing this? :) -Eric
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00059.html (11,535 bytes)

10. Re: Question related to XFS sync , especially fsync (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:26:52 +1100
This would be good to know. If you absolutely must use inode numbers instead of path names, you should use the "by-handle" interface (like xfsdump, xfs_fsr, etc) and not use the ondisk structures dir
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00065.html (12,227 bytes)

11. Re: Question related to XFS sync , especially fsync (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:13:54 +0530
Is there any XFS call from user level to flush metadata for a given file or complete log to disk? Thanks, Gopal. [[HTML alternate version deleted]]
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00073.html (13,235 bytes)

12. Re: Question related to XFS sync , especially fsync (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:55:17 +0530
Thank you Chris. While replying to Eric, I mentioned why we are doing that. We are basically providing interfaces to back up applications in a pure storage environment that deals with the back up at
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00074.html (13,341 bytes)

13. Re: Question related to XFS sync , especially fsync (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:52:15 +0100
Well, most commands are backed by a system call, right? For example, strace xfs_freeze to see what system calls it does. IIRC, only xfs_db has to access the raw device. For the block mapping, look at
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00075.html (12,283 bytes)

14. Re: Question related to XFS sync , especially fsync (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:41:17 +0530
You are right and that is the approach I will follow if there is no direct system call. Thanks, Gopal. [[HTML alternate version deleted]]
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00076.html (13,206 bytes)

15. Re: Question related to XFS sync , especially fsync (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:25:02 +0000
This basically can't work. If you do a plain block based backup you need to freeze the filesystem first and then either backup through a newly created snapshot or the raw device. Alternatively you ca
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00077.html (12,428 bytes)

16. Re: Question related to XFS sync , especially fsync (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:30:14 +0530
Thanks for the suggestions!. I will relook at the my idea and design....implemetation. As of now what we are doing is in experimental stage. Thanks, Gopal. [[HTML alternate version deleted]]
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00078.html (13,967 bytes)

17. Re: Question related to XFS sync , especially fsync (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:52:16 +1100
it sounds like you want something like NDMP. Check that out first. -- Mark Gopala Krishna wrote: Thanks for the suggestions!. I will relook at the my idea and design....implemetation. As of now what
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00079.html (14,378 bytes)

18. Re: Question related to XFS sync , especially fsync (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:17:34 +0100
Am Mittwoch 16 Januar 2008 schrieb Mark Goodwin: Is there an open source implementation available for this protocol? Would be interesting to know. -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvol
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00082.html (10,129 bytes)

19. Re: Question related to XFS sync , especially fsync (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:38:07 +1100
Martin Steigerwald wrote: Am Mittwoch 16 Januar 2008 schrieb Mark Goodwin: Gopala, it sounds like you want something like NDMP. Check that out first. Is there an open source implementation available
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00086.html (11,167 bytes)

20. Re: Question related to XFS sync , especially fsync (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:25:00 +0100
To Actually there is the FIOBMAP ioctl for data blocks. e.g. it's used by boot loaders like lilo to create a block map to read a file without knowledge of the file system. Should work on all file sys
/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00087.html (10,633 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu