Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Quota\s+mods\s+needed\s+for\s+journaled\s+quota\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Quota\s+mods\s+needed\s+for\s+journaled\s+quota\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Quota mods needed for journaled quota (score: 1): Author: "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 12:53:00 -0400; hi Stephen, It might also/alternatively be generally useful to allow a filesystem-specific implementation of quotactl itself - through an additional member in the dquot_operations set of functions? T; /archives/xfs/2000-10/msg00198.html (9,998 bytes)
2. Re: Quota mods needed for journaled quota (score: 1): Author: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 11:00:29 +0100; I'm not sure how useful that addition would be -- for quota_on and quota_off, at least, the setting up of the dquot structures around the superblock or their destruction after quota_off can probably; /archives/xfs/2000-10/msg00199.html (9,562 bytes)
3. Re: Quota mods needed for journaled quota (score: 1): Author: "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:03:19 -0400; hi Stephen, Hmmm ... I'm not so sure. In order to have the flexibility of filesystem-specific dquot formats, the struct dquot would need to become more like struct inode/super_block, i.e. not hardcod; /archives/xfs/2000-10/msg00205.html (9,606 bytes)
4. Re: Quota mods needed for journaled quota (score: 1): Author: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:25:12 +0100; Hmm. Probably I wouldn't allow to override quotactl() but make it like other callbacks - operations like quota_on() quota_off() and so could be overridden (or better filesystem could specify callbac; /archives/xfs/2000-10/msg00213.html (10,344 bytes)
5. Re: Quota mods needed for journaled quota (score: 1): Author: "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 12:53:00 -0400; hi Stephen, It might also/alternatively be generally useful to allow a filesystem-specific implementation of quotactl itself - through an additional member in the dquot_operations set of functions? T; /archives/xfs/2000-10/msg00418.html (9,998 bytes)
6. Re: Quota mods needed for journaled quota (score: 1): Author: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 11:00:29 +0100; I'm not sure how useful that addition would be -- for quota_on and quota_off, at least, the setting up of the dquot structures around the superblock or their destruction after quota_off can probably; /archives/xfs/2000-10/msg00419.html (9,562 bytes)
7. Re: Quota mods needed for journaled quota (score: 1): Author: "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:03:19 -0400; hi Stephen, Hmmm ... I'm not so sure. In order to have the flexibility of filesystem-specific dquot formats, the struct dquot would need to become more like struct inode/super_block, i.e. not hardcod; /archives/xfs/2000-10/msg00425.html (9,606 bytes)
8. Re: Quota mods needed for journaled quota (score: 1): Author: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:25:12 +0100; Hmm. Probably I wouldn't allow to override quotactl() but make it like other callbacks - operations like quota_on() quota_off() and so could be overridden (or better filesystem could specify callbac; /archives/xfs/2000-10/msg00433.html (10,344 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]