Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*RAID5\s+created\s+by\s+8\s+disks\s+works\s+with\s+xfs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*RAID5\s+created\s+by\s+8\s+disks\s+works\s+with\s+xfs\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: RAID5 created by 8 disks works with xfs (score: 1): Author: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:01:54 -0500; These fiilesystem issues have nothing to do with linux-raid. I'm copying the XFS mailing list which is where this discussion should be taking place from this point forward. Please reply-to-all, and p; /archives/xfs/2012-04/msg00038.html (11,381 bytes)
2. Re: RAID5 created by 8 disks works with xfs (score: 1): Author: daobang wang <wangdb1981@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 08:25:27 +0800; Hi All, I have found the solution, i updated the xfsprogs from 2.10.1 to 3.1.5, and could repair it, Thanks. Best Wishes, Daobang Wang.; /archives/xfs/2012-04/msg00046.html (12,883 bytes)
3. Re: RAID5 created by 8 disks works with xfs (score: 1): Author: daobang wang <wangdb1981@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 10:33:21 +0800; There is another issue, i updated xfsprog from 2.10.1 to 3.1.5, and found i could not make the xfs filesystem when the logical volume size large than 8TB with command mkfs.xfs -f -i size=512 /dev/vg+; /archives/xfs/2012-04/msg00052.html (13,561 bytes)
4. Re: RAID5 created by 8 disks works with xfs (score: 1): Author: Jack Wang <jack.wang.usish@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 14:00:35 +0800; using bigger inode size or inode64 does help? So your environment is NVR software running in Linux ,100+ D1 streamer directly write to filesystem on top of 16 SATA disks (with raid5 and vg)? 2012/4/6; /archives/xfs/2012-04/msg00054.html (15,906 bytes)
5. Re: RAID5 created by 8 disks works with xfs (score: 1): Author: daobang wang <wangdb1981@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 14:45:44 +0800; Hi Jacky, Yes, the environment is like your description, i will try with your suggestion. thanks a lot.; /archives/xfs/2012-04/msg00055.html (16,591 bytes)
6. Re: RAID5 created by 8 disks works with xfs (score: 1): Author: daobang wang <wangdb1981@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 14:49:59 +0800; I did more tests, and found the mkfs.xfs did not hang. I tried to make the xfs on 7TB logical volume, both 2.10.1 and 3.1.5 mkfs.xfs -f dev will work well, less than one minute. But when i tried to m; /archives/xfs/2012-04/msg00056.html (17,609 bytes)
7. Re: RAID5 created by 8 disks works with xfs (score: 1): Author: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 03:18:28 -0500; Once you provide the information I requested I'd be glad to help you further. Without that information I'm wasting my time. -- Stan; /archives/xfs/2012-04/msg00061.html (12,859 bytes)
8. Re: RAID5 created by 8 disks works with xfs (score: 1): Author: daobang wang <wangdb1981@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 16:45:06 +0800; Hi stan, Thank you for your reply, the envrionment is the same that i mentioned before, the user allows the cache data to miss, so i did not disable the barriers, they just demands that the filesyste; /archives/xfs/2012-04/msg00064.html (13,999 bytes)
9. Re: RAID5 created by 8 disks works with xfs (score: 1): Author: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 06:12:23 -0500; There's seems to be some kind of communication failure here. I'll make this really simple. Please fill in the blanks. $ uname -a $ xfs_info [device] $ cat /etc/fstab|grep xfs $ mdadm --detail /dev/md; /archives/xfs/2012-04/msg00067.html (12,363 bytes)
10. Re: RAID5 created by 8 disks works with xfs (score: 1): Author: daobang wang <wangdb1981@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:23:10 +0800; Hi stan, So sorry to reply this so late, the original envrionment is not exist now, i build a same one, please see the detail output. 1. uname -a Linux nsspioneer 2.6.36.4-v64 #1 SMP Fri Apr 13 10:16; /archives/xfs/2012-04/msg00869.html (15,567 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]