Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*REVIEW\:\s+fix\s+xfs_bmap\s+\-vp\s+confusion\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. REVIEW: fix xfs_bmap -vp confusion (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Naujok" <bnaujok@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:18:20 +1000
If xfs_bmap -vp is run on a file without unwritten extents and the filesystem does not use sunit/swidth, the FLAGS column is not shown. This leads to some confusion. So, when -vp option is used, it w
/archives/xfs/2007-07/msg00056.html (7,695 bytes)

2. Re: REVIEW: fix xfs_bmap -vp confusion (score: 1)
Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:53:47 +1000
I note that it only prints the legend if a flag is set. I guess this is ok, but maybe it would be more consistent to always print the legend? Or even to make the legend optional (which would make dum
/archives/xfs/2007-07/msg00058.html (8,220 bytes)

3. Re: REVIEW: fix xfs_bmap -vp confusion (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Naujok" <bnaujok@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:04:05 +1000
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:53:47 +1000, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> wrote: On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 01:18:20PM +1000, Barry Naujok wrote: If xfs_bmap -vp is run on a file without unwritten extents and the
/archives/xfs/2007-07/msg00060.html (9,320 bytes)

4. Re: REVIEW: fix xfs_bmap -vp confusion (score: 1)
Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:05:55 +1000
Ah, that'd be the > 1 check. Looks good then.... I haven't had time to read them yet. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group
/archives/xfs/2007-07/msg00062.html (9,268 bytes)

5. REVIEW: fix xfs_bmap -vp confusion (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Naujok" <bnaujok@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:18:20 +1000
If xfs_bmap -vp is run on a file without unwritten extents and the filesystem does not use sunit/swidth, the FLAGS column is not shown. This leads to some confusion. So, when -vp option is used, it w
/archives/xfs/2007-07/msg00419.html (7,695 bytes)

6. Re: REVIEW: fix xfs_bmap -vp confusion (score: 1)
Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:53:47 +1000
I note that it only prints the legend if a flag is set. I guess this is ok, but maybe it would be more consistent to always print the legend? Or even to make the legend optional (which would make dum
/archives/xfs/2007-07/msg00421.html (8,220 bytes)

7. Re: REVIEW: fix xfs_bmap -vp confusion (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Naujok" <bnaujok@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:04:05 +1000
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:53:47 +1000, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> wrote: On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 01:18:20PM +1000, Barry Naujok wrote: If xfs_bmap -vp is run on a file without unwritten extents and the
/archives/xfs/2007-07/msg00423.html (9,320 bytes)

8. Re: REVIEW: fix xfs_bmap -vp confusion (score: 1)
Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:05:55 +1000
Ah, that'd be the > 1 check. Looks good then.... I haven't had time to read them yet. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group
/archives/xfs/2007-07/msg00425.html (9,268 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu