Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*RFC\:\s+another\s+approach\s+for\s+64\-bit\s+network\s+stats\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*RFC\:\s+another\s+approach\s+for\s+64\-bit\s+network\s+stats\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. RFC: another approach for 64-bit network stats (score: 1): Author: oshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 16:06:05 +0200; This patch implements a lockless aproach for 64-bit netstatistics with only a very rare racecondition. On 64 bit system, nothing is changed. On 32 bit system the (32bit) counter is checked periodical; /archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00075.html (20,755 bytes)
2. Re: RFC: another approach for 64-bit network stats (score: 1): Author: inux_4ever@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 10:30:11 -0400; If you don't want to poll periodically for network stats, as has been repeatedly suggested, you can always poll periodically for the 64-bit NIC-specific stats that most gige adapters provide these da; /archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00076.html (7,921 bytes)
3. Re: RFC: another approach for 64-bit network stats (score: 1): Author: Hardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 09:53:17 -0700; Patrick McHardy wrote: This patch implements a lockless aproach for 64-bit netstatistics with only a very rare racecondition. On 64 bit system, nothing is changed. On 32 bit system I think that you s; /archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00077.html (9,261 bytes)
4. Re: RFC: another approach for 64-bit network stats (score: 1): Author: jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 13:33:43 -0400; Do you mean reworking the network statistics side of networking? Jeff. - -- Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html --BEGIN; /archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00078.html (8,421 bytes)
5. RFC: another approach for 64-bit network stats (score: 1): Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 16:06:05 +0200; This patch implements a lockless aproach for 64-bit netstatistics with only a very rare racecondition. On 64 bit system, nothing is changed. On 32 bit system the (32bit) counter is checked periodical; /archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00764.html (20,886 bytes)
6. Re: RFC: another approach for 64-bit network stats (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 10:30:11 -0400; If you don't want to poll periodically for network stats, as has been repeatedly suggested, you can always poll periodically for the 64-bit NIC-specific stats that most gige adapters provide these da; /archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00765.html (7,969 bytes)
7. Re: RFC: another approach for 64-bit network stats (score: 1): Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 09:53:17 -0700; I think that you should consider providing a new API as opposed to breaking existing APIs. And, perhaps this new API could deal with the very rare race to make it never happen? No matter how rare it; /archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00766.html (9,169 bytes)
8. Re: RFC: another approach for 64-bit network stats (score: 1): Author: Jeff Sipek <jeffpc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 13:33:43 -0400; Do you mean reworking the network statistics side of networking? Jeff. - -- Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html --BEGIN; /archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00767.html (8,508 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]