Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*RH\s+7\.3\s+and\s+XFS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*RH\s+7\.3\s+and\s+XFS\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

1. (score: 1): Author:; Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 14:09:52 +0200; x; /archives/xfs/2002-09/msg00319.html (7,858 bytes)
2. ? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 14:09:52 +0200; xxx; /archives/xfs/2002-09/msg00804.html (7,858 bytes)
3. rnal raid, external log?) (score: 1): Author: Henri Aanstoot <henria@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 11:34:32 -0100; e a new RAID-System shipped the next weeks with a total cpacity of 1.6 TB. I want to run XFS (what else?) on it and have some config qeustions. The RAID consists of 12 160GB IDE-Disks con; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00503.html (7,792 bytes)
4. rnal log?) (score: 1): Author: Juergen Sauer <juergen.sauer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 14:09:52 +0200; for you guys to release RH7.3 install iso .. :) Any release date known yet? (how long do i have to wait with formatting my laptop drive? ;) Love the work y'all do ... keep it up .. Henri; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00504.html (9,005 bytes)
5. g Free Software and Linux (score: 1): Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 07:37:27 +0200; disks or the RAID-controller. Both can possible cause this effect, if configured correctly. Yes, it certainly is possible to configure IDE-; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00514.html (9,669 bytes)
6. : Problem with controller (score: 1): Author: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 03:40:57 -0800; e.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE4757306; Tue, 28 May 2002 12:59:45 +0200 (CEST) Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx Organization: Sauter AG,; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00520.html (10,850 bytes)
7. .3 and XFS (score: 1): Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 14:36:47 +0200; ave asked about patching up the 7.3 installer and, understandably, these things take time, I was wondering if there was a way to upgrade to 7.3 over the network from a working 7.x system.; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00522.html (12,614 bytes)
8. o ISO? (score: 1): Author: Mike Burger <mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 09:15:56 -0400 (EDT); portunity to switch to Mandrake 8.2 after a catastrophic failure of my freshly updated rh7.3 system (something went _really_ wrong during one of the scheduled fscks and /etc was trashed c; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00525.html (12,656 bytes)
9. o ISO? (score: 1): Author: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 05:20:56 -0800; y, this is incorrect. SGI announces the release of the updated installer once it's completed. They also make it available for download, via their web site. When the installer is ready, an; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00526.html (11,425 bytes)
10. nd XFS (score: 1): Author: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 05:26:43 -0800; ed at your attribution line for the person you were replying to, apparently it was bogus. s/Stefan/whoever said its redhat's problem not SGI's/ im betting abou 40% of this list traffic is; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00527.html (9,935 bytes)
11. nd XFS (score: 1): Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 15:28:46 +0200; th Mandrake and SuSE have modified thier own installers to support XFS installation, I also rewrote the fs handling code in debian's boot-floppies to support XFS (though they don't ship a; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00528.html (12,568 bytes)
12. nd XFS (score: 1): Author: Mike Burger <mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 09:34:39 -0400 (EDT); for one reason: exposure. Wide testing. They sent out a patched RedHat installer iso that enabled people to install it and test it. Noone is screaming that SGI HAS to supply an installer; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00529.html (13,257 bytes)
13. rnal raid, external log?) (score: 1): Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 15:57:47 +0200; e a _must_ but a nice to have. Just for my own benefit I ran a real quick-n-dirty test. This involved copying data from one server to another - not sure the total size (~18G). Single Disk; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00531.html (14,745 bytes)
14. log?) (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 16:02:15 +0200; rtunately, this is incorrect. SGI announces the release of the updated installer once it's completed. They also make it available for download, via their web site. When the installer is r; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00532.html (8,711 bytes)
15. nd XFS (score: 1): Author: Mike Burger <mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 10:09:59 -0400 (EDT); 5-2002 -0400, Mike Burger wrote: It doesn't really matter. Like we've all said...it'll be out when it's out, and will be announced at that time, right? That sums it up nicely. Can we plea; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00533.html (11,175 bytes)
16. EXTENT with XATTR_REPLACE (score: 1): Author: David Lloyd <lloy0076@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 05:55:39 +0930; s problems I think: The old code would remove the existing value of the attribute, it would then calculate if the replacement attribute fitted in the inode. The new code will only put the; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00537.html (8,338 bytes)
17. EPLACE (score: 1): Author: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 28 May 2002 15:13:22 -0500; xisting value of the attribute, it would then calculate if the replacement attribute fitted in the inode. The new code will only put the; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00538.html (9,206 bytes)
18. ions (score: 1): Author: Henri Aanstoot <henria@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 11:34:32 -0100; day I was lurking around on several machines of mine and on one of them I found the following: Transactions xs_trans_sync........ 16615 ( 1.1480%) xs_trans_async....... 298806; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg01141.html (7,792 bytes)
19. stion (external raid, external log?) (score: 1): Author: Juergen Sauer <juergen.sauer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 14:09:52 +0200; D-System shipped the next weeks with a total cpacity of 1.6 TB. I want to run XFS (what else?) on it and have some config qeustions. The RAID consists of 12 160GB IDE-Disks con; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg01142.html (9,005 bytes)
20. teur Video Production Using Free Software and Linux (score: 1): Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 07:37:27 +0200; rives, or the interface conversion itself? If it's the drives, I believe that Seagate and IBM Ultrastar drives actually do honor; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg01152.html (9,669 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]