Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*RH7\.0\s+\+\s+XFS\s+cd\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. RH7.0 + XFS cd (score: 1)
Author: "Vernon McPherron" <vernon@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 14:52:57 -0700
I think the work that has been done to create a new system with FULL XFS (including / and /boot) is great! I'm thinking of modifing the installer just a bit more to include lvm support during the ins
/archives/xfs/2001-01/msg00305.html (7,536 bytes)

2. Re: RH7.0 + XFS cd (score: 1)
Author: "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 26 Jan 2001 09:10:24 -0500
[LVM vs. XFS] Our prerelease is based upon a 2.4.0 kernel, however, I think our boot disk is still a test11 kernel. Russell/Eric, can you confirm this? In that case our boot disk has LVM 0.8final, w
/archives/xfs/2001-01/msg00307.html (9,043 bytes)

3. Re: RH7.0 + XFS cd (score: 1)
Author: gdoucet@xxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 09:26:14 -0500
I run a NFS fileserver with LVM 0.8 and XFS as root filesystem, I think the kernel is 2.4.0test11, work great. But I agree with Martin the development is a mess. I try to upgrade to 0.9.X and it fail
/archives/xfs/2001-01/msg00308.html (8,640 bytes)

4. Re: RH7.0 + XFS cd (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 09:03:41 -0600
That is correct - there was some strange behavior with the anaconda installer and the 2.4.0 (released) kernel. Although the installer _installs_ 2.4.0, it _runs_ test11 during the install.
/archives/xfs/2001-01/msg00309.html (7,375 bytes)

5. RH7.0 + XFS cd (score: 1)
Author: "Vernon McPherron" <vernon@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 14:52:57 -0700
I think the work that has been done to create a new system with FULL XFS (including / and /boot) is great! I'm thinking of modifing the installer just a bit more to include lvm support during the ins
/archives/xfs/2001-01/msg00684.html (7,536 bytes)

6. Re: RH7.0 + XFS cd (score: 1)
Author: "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 26 Jan 2001 09:10:24 -0500
[LVM vs. XFS] Our prerelease is based upon a 2.4.0 kernel, however, I think our boot disk is still a test11 kernel. Russell/Eric, can you confirm this? In that case our boot disk has LVM 0.8final, w
/archives/xfs/2001-01/msg00686.html (9,043 bytes)

7. Re: RH7.0 + XFS cd (score: 1)
Author: gdoucet@xxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 09:26:14 -0500
I run a NFS fileserver with LVM 0.8 and XFS as root filesystem, I think the kernel is 2.4.0test11, work great. But I agree with Martin the development is a mess. I try to upgrade to 0.9.X and it fail
/archives/xfs/2001-01/msg00687.html (8,640 bytes)

8. Re: RH7.0 + XFS cd (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 09:03:41 -0600
That is correct - there was some strange behavior with the anaconda installer and the 2.4.0 (released) kernel. Although the installer _installs_ 2.4.0, it _runs_ test11 during the install.
/archives/xfs/2001-01/msg00688.html (7,375 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu