- 1. Red Hat bug 643571 (score: 1)
- Author: <shane.dempsey@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 11:45:20 -0500
- Hello, Sorry for forgetting a title! Shane. From: Dempsey, Shane Sent: 09 February 2012 16:21 To: 'xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx' Cc: OLeary, Kevin; Chang, Brady Subject: Hello, I believe Eric Sandee was working o
- /archives/xfs/2012-02/msg00226.html (8,707 bytes)
- 2. Re: Red Hat bug 643571 (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:41:41 -0600
- RH support is the better avenue for these questions, FWIW. But from the comments in the bug: linux-2.6-fs-xfs-fix-speculative-allocation-beyond-eof.patch is what went in; [sandeen@sandeen linux-2.6]$
- /archives/xfs/2012-02/msg00229.html (8,462 bytes)
- 3. RE: Red Hat bug 643571 (score: 1)
- Author: <shane.dempsey@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:17:24 -0500
- Hi Eric, Thanks a lot for your reply. Regards, Shane. RH support is the better avenue for these questions, FWIW. But from the comments in the bug: linux-2.6-fs-xfs-fix-speculative-allocation-beyond-e
- /archives/xfs/2012-02/msg00242.html (9,365 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu