Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Repeated\s+XFS\s+Crash\s+on\s+x86

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Repeated\s+XFS\s+Crash\s+on\s+x86_64\s+fiesty\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Repeated XFS Crash on x86_64 fiesty (score: 1): Author: Nick Gregory <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:02:38 +0100; I run a number of x86_64 ubuntu feisty (2.6.20-16-server) systems. Each has a near identical hardware spec i.e. the systems have a large (>6TB) xfs storage partition sat on top of a raid 6 array (us; /archives/xfs/2007-10/msg00144.html (12,302 bytes)
2. Re: Repeated XFS Crash on x86_64 fiesty (score: 1): Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:52:22 -0400 (EDT); Have you run memtest86? Have you checked the CPU? Is it an AMD64 CPU where the memory controller is onboard (and .. if damaged/overheating) could cause problems with the memory? On Fri, 12 Oct 2007,; /archives/xfs/2007-10/msg00146.html (13,195 bytes)
3. Re: Repeated XFS Crash on x86_64 fiesty (score: 1): Author: Nick Gregory <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 13:21:36 +0100; Justin Piszcz wrote: Have you run memtest86? Have you checked the CPU? Is it an AMD64 CPU where the memory controller is onboard (and .. if damaged/overheating) could cause problems with the memory?; /archives/xfs/2007-10/msg00151.html (8,210 bytes)
4. Re: Repeated XFS Crash on x86_64 fiesty (score: 1): Author: pg_xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi); Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:46:30 +0100; Multiple drive failures are somewhat more common than desirable, and RAID is based on the idea that failures are uncorrelated. But then I have seen storage systems where all the drives were of the s; /archives/xfs/2007-10/msg00154.html (8,500 bytes)
5. Repeated XFS Crash on x86_64 fiesty (score: 1): Author:; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:02:38 +0100; I run a number of x86_64 ubuntu feisty (2.6.20-16-server) systems. Each has a near identical hardware spec i.e. the systems have a large (>6TB) xfs storage partition sat on top of a raid 6 array (us; /archives/xfs/2007-10/msg00471.html (12,302 bytes)
6. Re: Repeated XFS Crash on x86_64 fiesty (score: 1): Author:; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:52:22 -0400 (EDT); Have you run memtest86? Have you checked the CPU? Is it an AMD64 CPU where the memory controller is onboard (and .. if damaged/overheating) could cause problems with the memory? On Fri, 12 Oct 2007,; /archives/xfs/2007-10/msg00473.html (13,195 bytes)
7. Re: Repeated XFS Crash on x86_64 fiesty (score: 1): Author:; Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 13:21:36 +0100; Justin Piszcz wrote: Have you run memtest86? Have you checked the CPU? Is it an AMD64 CPU where the memory controller is onboard (and .. if damaged/overheating) could cause problems with the memory?; /archives/xfs/2007-10/msg00478.html (8,210 bytes)
8. Re: Repeated XFS Crash on x86_64 fiesty (score: 1): Author:; Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:46:30 +0100; Multiple drive failures are somewhat more common than desirable, and RAID is based on the idea that failures are uncorrelated. But then I have seen storage systems where all the drives were of the s; /archives/xfs/2007-10/msg00481.html (8,500 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]