Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Seg\s+fault\s+during\s+xfs\s+repair\s+\(segmentation\s+fault\s+\/\s+segv\)\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Seg fault during xfs repair (segmentation fault / segv) (score: 1)
Author: Jesse Stroik <jstroik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:29:01 -0500
I have a server with a ~20TB xfs file system on Linux (2.6.18-92.1.22.el5) and am running xfsprogs-2.9.4-4.el5. We had a few corrupted files which I believe were due to a SCSI issue after a recent po
/archives/xfs/2009-06/msg00334.html (10,276 bytes)

2. Re: Seg fault during xfs repair (segmentation fault / segv) (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:41:18 -0500
It'd really be great to test more recent xfsprogs first, that one is about 2 years old. You can probably grab any recent fedora src.rpm and rebuild it, and later go back to the centos version if you
/archives/xfs/2009-06/msg00335.html (8,131 bytes)

3. Re: Seg fault during xfs repair (segmentation fault / segv) (score: 1)
Author: Jesse Stroik <jstroik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:01:56 -0500
Eric, Eric Sandeen wrote: Jesse Stroik wrote: I have a server with a ~20TB xfs file system on Linux (2.6.18-92.1.22.el5) and am running xfsprogs-2.9.4-4.el5. We had a few corrupted files which I beli
/archives/xfs/2009-06/msg00339.html (9,158 bytes)

4. Re: Seg fault during xfs repair (segmentation fault / segv) (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:11:54 -0500
Bummer :) That'd be great. Perhaps you can give these a shot: http://sandeen.fedorapeople.org/test/xfsprogs-3.0.1-8.test1.x86_64.rpm http://sandeen.fedorapeople.org/test/xfsprogs-debuginfo-3.0.1-8.te
/archives/xfs/2009-06/msg00340.html (9,574 bytes)

5. Re: Seg fault during xfs repair (segmentation fault / segv) (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:53:48 -0500
Ok, from a metadump image Jesse provided (thanks!) it's dying in here: bno = be32_to_cpu(agfl->agfl_bno[i]); printf("agfl at %p i is %d agfl_bno[i] %u bno is %u\n", agfl, i, agfl->agfl_bno[i], bno);
/archives/xfs/2009-07/msg00004.html (9,802 bytes)

6. Re: Seg fault during xfs repair (segmentation fault / segv) (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:34:02 -0500
Ok patch sent, but now I hit: junking entry "soh " in directory inode 128 entry ".nsr" in shortform directory 128 references invalid inode 210397 junking entry ".nsr" in directory inode 128 bogus ..
/archives/xfs/2009-07/msg00006.html (9,444 bytes)

7. Re: Seg fault during xfs repair (segmentation fault / segv) (score: 1)
Author: Jesse Stroik <jstroik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:51:16 -0500
Eric, Thanks for addressing the issue with xfs_repair. that's one crunchy filesystem you've got there; what happened to it? It's not entirely clear -- the JBOD and SAS controller seem to have gotten
/archives/xfs/2009-07/msg00007.html (8,964 bytes)

8. Re: Seg fault during xfs repair (segmentation fault / segv) (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:52:25 -0500
Turns out that it runs to completion, but another run still finds corruption. And a debug build trips asserts, so I guess there are still issues. -Eric
/archives/xfs/2009-07/msg00008.html (9,222 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu