Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Simple\s+Packet\s+Signing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Simple\s+Packet\s+Signing\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Simple Packet Signing (score: 1): Author: bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 18:05:53 +0200; Hi everybody, I'm considering implementing something called Simple Packet Signing. The current plan is at http://ds9a.nl/sps/PLAN "Ok, I have an itch to scratch. I have a laptop wich travels a lot an; /archives/netdev/2001-08/msg00116.html (7,962 bytes)
2. Re: Simple Packet Signing (score: 1): Author: Ethan Blanton <eblanton@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:20:22 -0400; bert hubert spake unto us the following wisdom: <snip> Sort of. Check out: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-moskowitz-hip-04.txt http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-moskowitz-hip-arch-; /archives/netdev/2001-08/msg00117.html (9,371 bytes)
3. Re: Simple Packet Signing (score: 1): Author: bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 00:13:12 +0200; Looks somewhat interesting, though still pretty complex. SPS is very much a 'now' thing, but perhaps the HIP people can learn from the mistakes we will obviously make. Thanks for pointing me to this; /archives/netdev/2001-08/msg00119.html (8,437 bytes)
4. Re: Simple Packet Signing (score: 1): Author: Werner Almesberger <wa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 06:25:43 +0200; You can set up SSH such that it only looks at a key, not at the IP address (well, it looks at it briefly, but look away if it doesn't like what it sees). You can either just copy the public host key; /archives/netdev/2001-08/msg00120.html (8,266 bytes)
5. Simple Packet Signing (score: 1): Author: bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 18:05:53 +0200; Hi everybody, I'm considering implementing something called Simple Packet Signing. The current plan is at http://ds9a.nl/sps/PLAN "Ok, I have an itch to scratch. I have a laptop wich travels a lot an; /archives/netdev/2001-08/msg00277.html (7,977 bytes)
6. Re: Simple Packet Signing (score: 1): Author: Ethan Blanton <eblanton@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:20:22 -0400; bert hubert spake unto us the following wisdom: <snip> Sort of. Check out: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-moskowitz-hip-04.txt http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-moskowitz-hip-arch-; /archives/netdev/2001-08/msg00278.html (9,543 bytes)
7. Re: Simple Packet Signing (score: 1): Author: bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 00:13:12 +0200; Looks somewhat interesting, though still pretty complex. SPS is very much a 'now' thing, but perhaps the HIP people can learn from the mistakes we will obviously make. Thanks for pointing me to this; /archives/netdev/2001-08/msg00280.html (8,568 bytes)
8. Re: Simple Packet Signing (score: 1): Author: Werner Almesberger <wa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 06:25:43 +0200; You can set up SSH such that it only looks at a key, not at the IP address (well, it looks at it briefly, but look away if it doesn't like what it sees). You can either just copy the public host key; /archives/netdev/2001-08/msg00281.html (8,378 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]