Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Source\s+code\s+for\s+Linux\s+XFS\s+now\s+available\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Source\s+code\s+for\s+Linux\s+XFS\s+now\s+available\!\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Source code for Linux XFS now available! (score: 1): Author: Jim Mostek <mostek@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 08:17:08 -0500 (CDT); There are a few files outside the modules we have that are affected. There are few modules that comprise XFS: xfs, pagebuf, and pagebuf_locking, avl. The last 3 are really just one module (from my pe; /archives/xfs/2000-04/msg00023.html (8,125 bytes)
2. Re: Source code for Linux XFS now available! (score: 1): Author: "Matt D. Robinson" <yakker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 10:45:25 -0700 (PDT); The archive for the Linux-XFS mailing list is available at: http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/archive/linux-xfs/ The link was broken, but it is now fixed. Jim, you may want to re-advertise this on lkml, as; /archives/xfs/2000-04/msg00031.html (7,933 bytes)
3. Re: Source code for Linux XFS now available! (score: 1): Author: Trevor Hurst <trev@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 11:26:39 -0700; I will be setting up MHonArc for this list as the current scheme is hideous and it will be much easier to read through the threads instead of a flat file. Comments? Cheers, -= Trev :o) -- Trevor Hurs; /archives/xfs/2000-04/msg00033.html (8,771 bytes)
4. Re: Source code for Linux XFS now available! (score: 1): Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 16:05:21 -0500; Neither the patch file nor the snapshot will be generated on a regular basis. The CVS stuff will be needed to keep up with the current state of the tree. I'm not sure why you would want to read the p; /archives/xfs/2000-04/msg00042.html (8,568 bytes)
5. Re: Source code for Linux XFS now available! (score: 1): Author: Jim Mostek <mostek@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 08:17:08 -0500 (CDT); There are a few files outside the modules we have that are affected. There are few modules that comprise XFS: xfs, pagebuf, and pagebuf_locking, avl. The last 3 are really just one module (from my pe; /archives/xfs/2000-04/msg00299.html (8,125 bytes)
6. Re: Source code for Linux XFS now available! (score: 1): Author: "Matt D. Robinson" <yakker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 10:45:25 -0700 (PDT); The archive for the Linux-XFS mailing list is available at: http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/archive/linux-xfs/ The link was broken, but it is now fixed. Jim, you may want to re-advertise this on lkml, as; /archives/xfs/2000-04/msg00307.html (7,933 bytes)
7. Re: Source code for Linux XFS now available! (score: 1): Author: Trevor Hurst <trev@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 11:26:39 -0700; I will be setting up MHonArc for this list as the current scheme is hideous and it will be much easier to read through the threads instead of a flat file. Comments? Cheers, -= Trev :o) -- Trevor Hurs; /archives/xfs/2000-04/msg00309.html (8,771 bytes)
8. Re: Source code for Linux XFS now available! (score: 1): Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 16:05:21 -0500; Neither the patch file nor the snapshot will be generated on a regular basis. The CVS stuff will be needed to keep up with the current state of the tree. I'm not sure why you would want to read the p; /archives/xfs/2000-04/msg00318.html (8,568 bytes)
9. Re: Source code for Linux XFS now available! (score: 1): Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 22:19:58 -0600; The green light from legal literally wasn't given till late Tuesday. I was up till 3 am finalizing the cvs transfer procedure. The source code release was something we all wanted. Have to start braci; /archives/xfs/2000-03/msg00038.html (9,753 bytes)
10. Re: Source code for Linux XFS now available! (score: 1): Author: Jim Mostek <mostek@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 08:53:51 -0600 (CST); Delete the inclusion of sys/quota.h. This isn't needed on Linux. You can also delete the inclusiong of xfs_types.h. At least this compiles file on my 2.3.99-pre2 system. Can you try it and see if it; /archives/xfs/2000-03/msg00046.html (9,746 bytes)
11. Re: Source code for Linux XFS now available! (score: 1): Author: Jim Mostek <mostek@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 11:32:03 -0600 (CST); This is going to be trickier. Can you move to Redhat 6.0? I know that works. Jim; /archives/xfs/2000-03/msg00054.html (10,161 bytes)
12. Re: Source code for Linux XFS now available! (score: 1): Author: Xavier Bertou <bertou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 19:52:42 +0200; Well, maybe I'll update (to a Mandrake 7.0, it would just be too easy with a Redhat 6.0...). I was quite happy of my redhat 5.2 with a 2.2.13 ext3 aware kernel, and just wanted to test XFS. A comple; /archives/xfs/2000-03/msg00056.html (8,572 bytes)
13. Re: Source code for Linux XFS now available! (score: 1): Author: cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 12:42:52 -0600; That is my choice... Well that is what I am running right now. The mandrake development tools are more current than the redhat ones. I put one in the download dir. hopefully it will work for you.; /archives/xfs/2000-03/msg00058.html (9,070 bytes)
14. Re: Source code for Linux XFS now available! (score: 1): Author: Jan Niehusmann <list005@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 20:44:45 +0200; I put a diff on http://137.226.181.3/~jan/xfs/ It's a patch between 2.3.99pre2 and the tar archive published on oss.sgi.com. It's _not_ relative to the current CVS. Jan; /archives/xfs/2000-03/msg00059.html (8,198 bytes)
15. Re: Source code for Linux XFS now available! (score: 1): Author: Xavier Bertou <bertou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 21:00:49 +0200; Yes. I have a bunch of PCs under Mandrake 7.0, quite stable (and my laptop too). But a distribution upgrade on a machine you've been working on for a year is definitely not so easy. root ~ mount [..; /archives/xfs/2000-03/msg00061.html (8,996 bytes)
16. Re: Source code for Linux XFS now available! (score: 1): Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 22:19:58 -0600; The green light from legal literally wasn't given till late Tuesday. I was up till 3 am finalizing the cvs transfer procedure. The source code release was something we all wanted. Have to start braci; /archives/xfs/2000-03/msg00105.html (9,753 bytes)
17. Re: Source code for Linux XFS now available! (score: 1): Author: Jim Mostek <mostek@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 08:53:51 -0600 (CST); Delete the inclusion of sys/quota.h. This isn't needed on Linux. You can also delete the inclusiong of xfs_types.h. At least this compiles file on my 2.3.99-pre2 system. Can you try it and see if it; /archives/xfs/2000-03/msg00113.html (9,746 bytes)
18. Re: Source code for Linux XFS now available! (score: 1): Author: Jim Mostek <mostek@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 11:32:03 -0600 (CST); This is going to be trickier. Can you move to Redhat 6.0? I know that works. Jim; /archives/xfs/2000-03/msg00121.html (10,161 bytes)
19. Re: Source code for Linux XFS now available! (score: 1): Author: Xavier Bertou <bertou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 19:52:42 +0200; Well, maybe I'll update (to a Mandrake 7.0, it would just be too easy with a Redhat 6.0...). I was quite happy of my redhat 5.2 with a 2.2.13 ext3 aware kernel, and just wanted to test XFS. A comple; /archives/xfs/2000-03/msg00123.html (8,572 bytes)
20. Re: Source code for Linux XFS now available! (score: 1): Author: cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 12:42:52 -0600; That is my choice... Well that is what I am running right now. The mandrake development tools are more current than the redhat ones. I put one in the download dir. hopefully it will work for you.; /archives/xfs/2000-03/msg00125.html (9,070 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]