Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TAKE\s+\-\s+merge\s+up\s+to\s+2\.4\.10\-pre13\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. TAKE - merge up to 2.4.10-pre13 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 14:31:10 -0500
Here is the next one. The following file(s) were checked into: bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs Modid: 2.4.x-xfs:slinx:103243a linux/include/asm-sh/tlb.h - 1.1 linux/include/asm-s390x/tlb.h
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00532.html (10,783 bytes)

2. Re: TAKE - merge up to 2.4.10-pre13 (score: 1)
Author: Joseph Fannin <jhf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 15:42:33 -0400
Does it work? You have a point about the VM stuff being changed in a stable kernel... but I think I'd have to say Linus is working on 2.3, not 2.5. ;-) -- Joseph Fannin jhf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx "Bull in pu
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00533.html (7,466 bytes)

3. Re: TAKE - merge up to 2.4.10-pre13 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 14:48:27 -0500
It seems to. I actually made the xfs footprint in the main kernel smaller in the pre12 kernel, so the new VM was a little easier to deal with from that point of view. Steve
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg00534.html (7,438 bytes)

4. TAKE - merge up to 2.4.10-pre13 (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 14:31:10 -0500
Here is the next one. The following file(s) were checked into: bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs Modid: 2.4.x-xfs:slinx:103243a linux/include/asm-sh/tlb.h - 1.1 linux/include/asm-s390x/tlb.h
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg01210.html (10,783 bytes)

5. Re: TAKE - merge up to 2.4.10-pre13 (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 15:42:33 -0400
Does it work? You have a point about the VM stuff being changed in a stable kernel... but I think I'd have to say Linus is working on 2.3, not 2.5. ;-) -- Joseph Fannin jhf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx "Bull in pu
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg01211.html (7,466 bytes)

6. Re: TAKE - merge up to 2.4.10-pre13 (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 14:48:27 -0500
It seems to. I actually made the xfs footprint in the main kernel smaller in the pre12 kernel, so the new VM was a little easier to deal with from that point of view. Steve
/archives/xfs/2001-09/msg01212.html (7,438 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu