- 1. TAKE 976035 - streamline init/exit path (score: 1)
- Author: xaiki@xxxxxxx (Niv Sardi)
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:00:57 +1000 (EST)
- streamline init/exit path Currently the xfs module init/exit code is a mess. It's farmed out over a lot of function with very little error checking. This patch makes sure we propagate all initializat
- /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00315.html (12,225 bytes)
- 2. Re: TAKE 976035 - streamline init/exit path (score: 1)
- Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:57:19 -0400
- Umm, this has been in for a long time. Did the mail leave your mail queue only now? :)
- /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00320.html (8,058 bytes)
- 3. Re: TAKE 976035 - streamline init/exit path (score: 1)
- Author: Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:56:51 +1000
- Nah, it got into ptools with a bogus commit message and PV and all, and now is in master tottally broken, the plan is to let it die in master and cherry-pick the new one in for-linus. Sorry for the m
- /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00326.html (8,634 bytes)
- 4. Re: TAKE 976035 - streamline init/exit path (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:54:41 +1000
- Niv, can you now do another checkin that fixes the compilation error when CONFIG_PROCFS=N in fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.h that was reported on linux-next (i.e. fix the bug that led up to everyone dis
- /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00376.html (9,099 bytes)
- 5. TAKE 976035 - streamline init/exit path (score: 1)
- Author: xaiki@xxxxxxx (Niv Sardi)
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:00:57 +1000 (EST)
- streamline init/exit path Currently the xfs module init/exit code is a mess. It's farmed out over a lot of function with very little error checking. This patch makes sure we propagate all initializat
- /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00775.html (12,225 bytes)
- 6. Re: TAKE 976035 - streamline init/exit path (score: 1)
- Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:57:19 -0400
- Umm, this has been in for a long time. Did the mail leave your mail queue only now? :)
- /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00780.html (8,058 bytes)
- 7. Re: TAKE 976035 - streamline init/exit path (score: 1)
- Author: Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:56:51 +1000
- Nah, it got into ptools with a bogus commit message and PV and all, and now is in master tottally broken, the plan is to let it die in master and cherry-pick the new one in for-linus. Sorry for the m
- /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00786.html (8,634 bytes)
- 8. Re: TAKE 976035 - streamline init/exit path (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:54:41 +1000
- Niv, can you now do another checkin that fixes the compilation error when CONFIG_PROCFS=N in fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.h that was reported on linux-next (i.e. fix the bug that led up to everyone dis
- /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00836.html (9,099 bytes)
- 9. TAKE 976035 - streamline init/exit path (score: 1)
- Author: xaiki@xxxxxxx (Niv Sardi)
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:00:57 +1000 (EST)
- streamline init/exit path Currently the xfs module init/exit code is a mess. It's farmed out over a lot of function with very little error checking. This patch makes sure we propagate all initializat
- /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg01235.html (12,435 bytes)
- 10. Re: TAKE 976035 - streamline init/exit path (score: 1)
- Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:57:19 -0400
- Umm, this has been in for a long time. Did the mail leave your mail queue only now? :)
- /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg01240.html (8,180 bytes)
- 11. Re: TAKE 976035 - streamline init/exit path (score: 1)
- Author: Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:56:51 +1000
- Nah, it got into ptools with a bogus commit message and PV and all, and now is in master tottally broken, the plan is to let it die in master and cherry-pick the new one in for-linus. Sorry for the m
- /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg01246.html (8,755 bytes)
- 12. Re: TAKE 976035 - streamline init/exit path (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:54:41 +1000
- Niv, can you now do another checkin that fixes the compilation error when CONFIG_PROCFS=N in fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_stats.h that was reported on linux-next (i.e. fix the bug that led up to everyone dis
- /archives/xfs/2008-06/msg01296.html (9,221 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu