Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Unexpected\s+XFS\s+SB\s+number\s+0x00000000\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <hsvchris@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:33:35 +0100
I'm running a home file server with Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 4.0r1 etch (2.6.18-5-amd64 Kernel) and an Areca ARC-1220 hardware RAID controller. I used to have 4 750GB HDDs connected and set up as RAID 5
/archives/xfs/2007-12/msg00055.html (8,685 bytes)

2. Re: Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:55:17 -0500 (EST)
I'm running a home file server with Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 4.0r1 etch (2.6.18-5-amd64 Kernel) and an Areca ARC-1220 hardware RAID controller. I used to have 4 750GB HDDs connected and set up as RAID 5
/archives/xfs/2007-12/msg00056.html (9,911 bytes)

3. Re: Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:40:22 -0600
Did your new partition table start in exactly the same place? Can you find the string "XFSB" anywhere near where your old partition started? -Eric
/archives/xfs/2007-12/msg00057.html (8,967 bytes)

4. Re: Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <hsvchris@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 02:06:43 +0100
cylinders/heads/sectors it uses. But I'm > sure there are other tools? 2199023.26 MB free space, > although I wrote a single partition of 3000598.57 MB into the table before rebooting. I just tested
/archives/xfs/2007-12/msg00061.html (9,543 bytes)

5. Re: Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:12:56 -0600
So, did you originally have a gpt or an msdos partition table?
/archives/xfs/2007-12/msg00063.html (9,224 bytes)

6. Re: Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <hsvchris@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:47:44 +0100
Seems like using parted to write a new partition table did the job for me. Used 17.4kB as start and 3000GB as end. Now being able to mount the partition successfully I ran xfs_growfs. Afterwards, I s
/archives/xfs/2007-12/msg00068.html (7,970 bytes)

7. Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <hsvchris@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:33:35 +0100
I'm running a home file server with Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 4.0r1 etch (2.6.18-5-amd64 Kernel) and an Areca ARC-1220 hardware RAID controller. I used to have 4 750GB HDDs connected and set up as RAID 5
/archives/xfs/2007-12/msg00287.html (8,685 bytes)

8. Re: Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:55:17 -0500 (EST)
I'm running a home file server with Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 4.0r1 etch (2.6.18-5-amd64 Kernel) and an Areca ARC-1220 hardware RAID controller. I used to have 4 750GB HDDs connected and set up as RAID 5
/archives/xfs/2007-12/msg00288.html (9,911 bytes)

9. Re: Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:40:22 -0600
Did your new partition table start in exactly the same place? Can you find the string "XFSB" anywhere near where your old partition started? -Eric
/archives/xfs/2007-12/msg00289.html (8,967 bytes)

10. Re: Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <hsvchris@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 02:06:43 +0100
cylinders/heads/sectors it uses. But I'm > sure there are other tools? 2199023.26 MB free space, > although I wrote a single partition of 3000598.57 MB into the table before rebooting. I just tested
/archives/xfs/2007-12/msg00293.html (9,543 bytes)

11. Re: Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:12:56 -0600
So, did you originally have a gpt or an msdos partition table?
/archives/xfs/2007-12/msg00295.html (9,224 bytes)

12. Re: Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <hsvchris@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:47:44 +0100
Seems like using parted to write a new partition table did the job for me. Used 17.4kB as start and 3000GB as end. Now being able to mount the partition successfully I ran xfs_growfs. Afterwards, I s
/archives/xfs/2007-12/msg00300.html (7,970 bytes)

13. Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
Author: Martin Eisenhardt <martin.eisenhardt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:46:55 +0200
Hello list(s), I run XFS on a software raid on Linux 2.6.19. When I invoke xfs_db in read-only mode, I get: xfs_db: unexpected XFS SB magic number 0x00000000 xfs_db: read failed: Invalid argument xfs
/archives/xfs/2007-04/msg00169.html (8,026 bytes)

14. Re: Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:57:19 +1000
I think this segfault is fixed in recent xfs_db versions. It looks like a real problem to me - something has written zeroes to the start of your partition, where the primary XFS superblock should be.
/archives/xfs/2007-04/msg00170.html (9,280 bytes)

15. Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
Author: Martin Eisenhardt <martin.eisenhardt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:46:55 +0200
Hello list(s), I run XFS on a software raid on Linux 2.6.19. When I invoke xfs_db in read-only mode, I get: xfs_db: unexpected XFS SB magic number 0x00000000 xfs_db: read failed: Invalid argument xfs
/archives/xfs/2007-04/msg00374.html (8,026 bytes)

16. Re: Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:57:19 +1000
I think this segfault is fixed in recent xfs_db versions. It looks like a real problem to me - something has written zeroes to the start of your partition, where the primary XFS superblock should be.
/archives/xfs/2007-04/msg00375.html (9,280 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu