- 1. Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
- Author: "Chris" <hsvchris@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:33:35 +0100
- I'm running a home file server with Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 4.0r1 etch (2.6.18-5-amd64 Kernel) and an Areca ARC-1220 hardware RAID controller. I used to have 4 750GB HDDs connected and set up as RAID 5
- /archives/xfs/2007-12/msg00055.html (8,685 bytes)
- 2. Re: Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
- Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:55:17 -0500 (EST)
- I'm running a home file server with Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 4.0r1 etch (2.6.18-5-amd64 Kernel) and an Areca ARC-1220 hardware RAID controller. I used to have 4 750GB HDDs connected and set up as RAID 5
- /archives/xfs/2007-12/msg00056.html (9,911 bytes)
- 3. Re: Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:40:22 -0600
- Did your new partition table start in exactly the same place? Can you find the string "XFSB" anywhere near where your old partition started? -Eric
- /archives/xfs/2007-12/msg00057.html (8,967 bytes)
- 4. Re: Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
- Author: "Chris" <hsvchris@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 02:06:43 +0100
- cylinders/heads/sectors it uses. But I'm > sure there are other tools? 2199023.26 MB free space, > although I wrote a single partition of 3000598.57 MB into the table before rebooting. I just tested
- /archives/xfs/2007-12/msg00061.html (9,543 bytes)
- 5. Re: Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:12:56 -0600
- So, did you originally have a gpt or an msdos partition table?
- /archives/xfs/2007-12/msg00063.html (9,224 bytes)
- 6. Re: Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
- Author: "Chris" <hsvchris@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:47:44 +0100
- Seems like using parted to write a new partition table did the job for me. Used 17.4kB as start and 3000GB as end. Now being able to mount the partition successfully I ran xfs_growfs. Afterwards, I s
- /archives/xfs/2007-12/msg00068.html (7,970 bytes)
- 7. Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
- Author: "Chris" <hsvchris@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:33:35 +0100
- I'm running a home file server with Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 4.0r1 etch (2.6.18-5-amd64 Kernel) and an Areca ARC-1220 hardware RAID controller. I used to have 4 750GB HDDs connected and set up as RAID 5
- /archives/xfs/2007-12/msg00287.html (8,685 bytes)
- 8. Re: Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
- Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:55:17 -0500 (EST)
- I'm running a home file server with Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 4.0r1 etch (2.6.18-5-amd64 Kernel) and an Areca ARC-1220 hardware RAID controller. I used to have 4 750GB HDDs connected and set up as RAID 5
- /archives/xfs/2007-12/msg00288.html (9,911 bytes)
- 9. Re: Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:40:22 -0600
- Did your new partition table start in exactly the same place? Can you find the string "XFSB" anywhere near where your old partition started? -Eric
- /archives/xfs/2007-12/msg00289.html (8,967 bytes)
- 10. Re: Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
- Author: "Chris" <hsvchris@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 02:06:43 +0100
- cylinders/heads/sectors it uses. But I'm > sure there are other tools? 2199023.26 MB free space, > although I wrote a single partition of 3000598.57 MB into the table before rebooting. I just tested
- /archives/xfs/2007-12/msg00293.html (9,543 bytes)
- 11. Re: Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:12:56 -0600
- So, did you originally have a gpt or an msdos partition table?
- /archives/xfs/2007-12/msg00295.html (9,224 bytes)
- 12. Re: Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
- Author: "Chris" <hsvchris@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:47:44 +0100
- Seems like using parted to write a new partition table did the job for me. Used 17.4kB as start and 3000GB as end. Now being able to mount the partition successfully I ran xfs_growfs. Afterwards, I s
- /archives/xfs/2007-12/msg00300.html (7,970 bytes)
- 13. Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
- Author: Martin Eisenhardt <martin.eisenhardt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:46:55 +0200
- Hello list(s), I run XFS on a software raid on Linux 2.6.19. When I invoke xfs_db in read-only mode, I get: xfs_db: unexpected XFS SB magic number 0x00000000 xfs_db: read failed: Invalid argument xfs
- /archives/xfs/2007-04/msg00169.html (8,026 bytes)
- 14. Re: Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
- Author: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:57:19 +1000
- I think this segfault is fixed in recent xfs_db versions. It looks like a real problem to me - something has written zeroes to the start of your partition, where the primary XFS superblock should be.
- /archives/xfs/2007-04/msg00170.html (9,280 bytes)
- 15. Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
- Author: Martin Eisenhardt <martin.eisenhardt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:46:55 +0200
- Hello list(s), I run XFS on a software raid on Linux 2.6.19. When I invoke xfs_db in read-only mode, I get: xfs_db: unexpected XFS SB magic number 0x00000000 xfs_db: read failed: Invalid argument xfs
- /archives/xfs/2007-04/msg00374.html (8,026 bytes)
- 16. Re: Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 (score: 1)
- Author: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:57:19 +1000
- I think this segfault is fixed in recent xfs_db versions. It looks like a real problem to me - something has written zeroes to the start of your partition, where the primary XFS superblock should be.
- /archives/xfs/2007-04/msg00375.html (9,280 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu