Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Update\s+on\s+e1000\s+troubles\s+$over\-heating\!$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Update\s+on\s+e1000\s+troubles\s+$over\-heating\!$\s*$/: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

1. Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!) (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 20:38:59 -0700; days or; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00087.html (9,332 bytes)
2. Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!) (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 20:47:21 -0700 (PDT); robe. I; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00088.html (10,595 bytes)
3. RE: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!) (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 00:33:38 -0700; thanks.; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00094.html (9,612 bytes)
4. Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!) (score: 1): Author: Scott" <scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 18:38:32 -0400 (EDT); , jamal; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00098.html (9,241 bytes)
5. Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!) (score: 1): Author: w@xxxxxxxxxx; Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 17:14:51 -0700 (PDT); t shoul; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00100.html (10,646 bytes)
6. Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!) (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 20:46:42 -0700; packet; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00103.html (10,940 bytes)
7. Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!) (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 22:26:33 -0700 (PDT); s; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00105.html (9,917 bytes)
8. Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!) (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 07:53:26 -0400 (EDT); ide onl; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00111.html (9,974 bytes)
9. Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!) (score: 1): Author: nn@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 07:56:59 -0400 (EDT); , jamal; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00112.html (9,226 bytes)
10. Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!) (score: 1): Author: y System<MAILER-DAEMON@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 04:58:44 -0700 (PDT); can you; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00113.html (9,960 bytes)
11. Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!) (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 09:40:13 -0700; x Lengt; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00118.html (12,616 bytes)
12. Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!) (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 11:44:30 -0700; ? Jason; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00140.html (23,008 bytes)
13. RE: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!) (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 19:20:04 -0700; that d; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00246.html (9,719 bytes)
14. Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!) (score: 1): Author: Rompf <srompf@xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 04:37:23 +0200; . Did t; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00247.html (10,422 bytes)
15. Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!) (score: 1): Author: efan Rompf <srompf@xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 19:54:15 -0700; die the; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00248.html (10,441 bytes)
16. Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!) (score: 1): Author: <david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 22:42:38 -0700; t apolo; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00250.html (10,507 bytes)
17. Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!) (score: 1): Author: cott" <scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 00:01:14 -0700; to blow; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00251.html (10,885 bytes)
18. Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!) (score: 1): Author: Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 00:07:37 -0700; to blow; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00252.html (10,797 bytes)
19. Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!) (score: 1): Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 20:38:59 -0700; I believe I have figured out why the e1000 crashed my machine after .5 - 1 hours: The NIC was over-heating. I measured one of the NICs after the machine crashed with an external (cheap) temp probe. I; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00698.html (9,161 bytes)
20. Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!) (score: 1): Author: Andre Hedrick <andre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 20:47:21 -0700 (PDT); I have a pair of Compaq e1000's which have never overheated, and I use them for heavy duty iSCSI testing and designing of drivers. These are massive 66/64 cards but still nothing like what you are re; /archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00699.html (10,709 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]