- 1. Updated XFS merge status (score: 1)
- Author:
- Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 11:18:06 +0200
- [this document is available online from http://verein.lst.de/~hch/xfs/status.txt] XFS Merge status as of 2002/08/21 Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Covered kernels: - 2.4.20-pre4 - 2.4.20-pre2-ac5 - 2
- /archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00316.html (9,593 bytes)
- 2. Re: Updated XFS merge status (score: 1)
- Author:
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:30:28 +0200
- [...] What are these "political reasons?" Thanks for filling me in. -- Sign the EU petition against SPAM: L I N U X .~. http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/ The Choice /V\ of a GNU /( )\ Generation ^^
- /archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00334.html (8,455 bytes)
- 3. Re: Updated XFS merge status (score: 1)
- Author:
- Date: 22 Aug 2002 04:39:47 -0500
- Linus does not believe in debuggers, lots of other people do, but not Linus. Search an archive of the kernel mailing list for the details on this. Steve
- /archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00335.html (8,455 bytes)
- 4. Re: Updated XFS merge status (score: 1)
- Author:
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:53:32 +0200
- I see. Well, I have certain strong feelings about this (I do respect Linus for what he did), but I don't utter them publicly because I probably WOULD provoke a flamewar if I did. Thanks for the info.
- /archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00336.html (9,199 bytes)
- 5. Re: Updated XFS merge status (score: 1)
- Author:
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 23:13:19 +1000
- http://www.lib.uaa.alaska.edu/linux-kernel/archive/2000-Week-36/0575.html http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=96865229622167&w=2
- /archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00339.html (8,228 bytes)
- 6. Re: Updated XFS merge status (score: 1)
- Author:
- Date: 22 Aug 2002 11:55:25 -0500
- I believe what Linus said, was that he did not like debuggers in the kernel tree and viewed it as bloat, constant source of pain, etc. I remember some mail on this from a time ago. -- Austin Gonyou <
- /archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00342.html (8,530 bytes)
- 7. Updated XFS merge status (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 11:18:06 +0200
- [this document is available online from http://verein.lst.de/~hch/xfs/status.txt] XFS Merge status as of 2002/08/21 Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Covered kernels: - 2.4.20-pre4 - 2.4.20-pre2-ac5 - 2
- /archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00903.html (9,593 bytes)
- 8. Re: Updated XFS merge status (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:30:28 +0200
- [...] What are these "political reasons?" Thanks for filling me in. -- Sign the EU petition against SPAM: L I N U X .~. http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/ The Choice /V\ of a GNU /( )\ Generation ^^
- /archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00921.html (8,455 bytes)
- 9. Re: Updated XFS merge status (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: 22 Aug 2002 04:39:47 -0500
- Linus does not believe in debuggers, lots of other people do, but not Linus. Search an archive of the kernel mailing list for the details on this. Steve
- /archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00922.html (8,455 bytes)
- 10. Re: Updated XFS merge status (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:53:32 +0200
- I see. Well, I have certain strong feelings about this (I do respect Linus for what he did), but I don't utter them publicly because I probably WOULD provoke a flamewar if I did. Thanks for the info.
- /archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00923.html (9,199 bytes)
- 11. Re: Updated XFS merge status (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 23:13:19 +1000
- http://www.lib.uaa.alaska.edu/linux-kernel/archive/2000-Week-36/0575.html http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=96865229622167&w=2
- /archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00926.html (8,228 bytes)
- 12. Re: Updated XFS merge status (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: 22 Aug 2002 11:55:25 -0500
- I believe what Linus said, was that he did not like debuggers in the kernel tree and viewed it as bloat, constant source of pain, etc. I remember some mail on this from a time ago. -- Austin Gonyou <
- /archives/xfs/2002-08/msg00929.html (8,530 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu