Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\,\s+NFS\s+and\s+inode64\s+on\s+2\.6\.27\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. XFS, NFS and inode64 on 2.6.27 (score: 1)
Author: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:52:43 +0100
Dear all, after searching for a long time I guess I found that inode64 on XFS with kernel 2.6.27 (shipped with openSUSE 11.1) is incompatible with NFS. Sorry if this was already know, it wasn't for m
/archives/xfs/2009-11/msg00161.html (8,739 bytes)

2. Re: XFS, NFS and inode64 on 2.6.27 (score: 1)
Author: "Nathaniel W. Turner" <nate@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:23:17 -0500
Michael Monnerie wrote: after searching for a long time I guess I found that inode64 on XFS with kernel 2.6.27 (shipped with openSUSE 11.1) is incompatible with NFS. Sorry if this was already know, i
/archives/xfs/2009-11/msg00168.html (7,791 bytes)

3. Re: XFS, NFS and inode64 on 2.6.27 (score: 1)
Author: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:47:09 +0100
Yep. I've used 64bit since years, as AMD has that since a long time in all their CPUs (there have just been some Semprons 32bit only). And now since every PC has >3GB RAM it's nearly a must. mfg zmi
/archives/xfs/2009-11/msg00172.html (8,499 bytes)

4. Re: XFS, NFS and inode64 on 2.6.27 (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:16:57 -0500
So your NFS exports are not the roots of their respsective filesystems? This means NFSD uses non-standard filesystem IDs in the filehandles which have to encode the inode number of the export root. Y
/archives/xfs/2009-11/msg00174.html (8,412 bytes)

5. Re: XFS, NFS and inode64 on 2.6.27 (score: 1)
Author: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:17:57 +0100
That's the way it works with NFSv4. You create an NFS root dir with a special entry in /etc/exports: /nfsserver 10.0.0.0/8(fsid=0,rw,insecure,no_subtree_check,crossmnt) and if you want other parts ex
/archives/xfs/2009-11/msg00177.html (10,269 bytes)

6. Re: XFS, NFS and inode64 on 2.6.27 (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:31:01 -0500
I'm not sure, haven't deal with nfs utils a lot recently. I'd suggest you brings this up on linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2009-11/msg00179.html (8,716 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu