Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+\&\s+ADSM\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+\&\s+ADSM\s*$/: 39 ]

Total 39 documents matching your query.

1. XFS & ADSM (score: 1): Author: werner maes <werner.maes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 11:58:15 +0200; On a system with XFS installed (using the RH 7.1 iso) I'm not able to backup my files using ADSM (backup on tape). Without XFS there's no problem. I also tried disabling devfs but this did not work; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00049.html (7,517 bytes)
2. Re: XFS & ADSM (score: 1): Author: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <marcelo.magallon@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 14:07:52 +0200; To put it midly, ADSM is a POS. For some reason it checks the filesystem type of the partition where the data it is trying to backup is located, finds it's "xfs", it has no idea what that is and bom; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00050.html (8,846 bytes)
3. Re: XFS & ADSM (score: 1): Author: Hasch@xxxxxxxxxxx (Juergen Hasch); Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 18:38:42 +0200; Am Montag, 2. Juli 2001 14:07 schrieb Marcelo E. Magallon: It's not that bad. If you use a more recent backup client, it should work. The most recent version 4.2.0 of TSM even supports XFS . ...Juerg; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00059.html (9,044 bytes)
4. Re: XFS & ADSM (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 19:23:17 +0200; It's unfortunately not even an ADSM only problem. e.g. Arkeia has the same one and even VMWare checks file system types for some unknown reason. -Andi; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00061.html (9,147 bytes)
5. Re: XFS & ADSM (score: 1): Author: Werner Maes <werner.maes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 19:25:58 +0200; Sounds great, but if I check the website of Tivoli, the most recent version seems to be 4.1.2 (http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/clients.html#clients). So where did you get version 4.2.0? We; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00062.html (8,466 bytes)
6. Re: XFS & ADSM (score: 1): Author: Hasch@xxxxxxxxxxx (Juergen Hasch); Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 19:44:01 +0200; Am Montag, 2. Juli 2001 19:25 schrieb Werner Maes: It was released on July 01 :-) Look at: ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/client/v4r2/Linux86/v420 The guy; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00064.html (9,293 bytes)
7. Re: XFS & ADSM (score: 1): Author: Hasch@xxxxxxxxxxx (Juergen Hasch); Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 18:47:57 +0200; Am Montag, 2. Juli 2001 18:38 schrieb Juergen Hasch: I guess I was a little to optimistic. I shouldn't write things I don't understand much of. ...Juergen; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00067.html (8,392 bytes)
8. Re: XFS & ADSM (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 22:03:32 +0200; I don't know much about TSM/ADSM, but if it's only checking the file system name in /etc/mtab you can probably fix it with a binary editor, replacing the name of an unused file system with the same l; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00068.html (9,195 bytes)
9. Re: XFS & ADSM (score: 1): Author: Hasch@xxxxxxxxxxx (Juergen Hasch); Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 22:48:38 +0200; Am Montag, 2. Juli 2001 22:03 schrieb Andi Kleen: I looked at the release notes of the TSM client 4.2.0 and it states: o The functionality of the Tivoli Storage Manager Linux client is designed and t; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00069.html (9,818 bytes)
10. Re: XFS & ADSM (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 15:52:49 -0500; I took a quick look around the download site this morning, and noticed that they have an Irix version. So it would not be a huge amount of effort to use the modified api we have in Linux to get to t; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00070.html (10,108 bytes)
11. Re: XFS & ADSM (score: 1): Author: "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 23:21:39 +0200; VMWare checks for locking capabilities - it doesn't know anything about XFS as a filesystem but it prints a helpful error message to add something to your blah.cfg and that helps. host.FSSupportLock; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00072.html (8,600 bytes)
12. Re: XFS & ADSM (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 23:23:58 +0200; They fixed that when reiserfs became popular. Older vmware wasn't that helpful. It is the wrong way anyways to check for locking, instead they should just do a autoconf style runtime check if it work; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00073.html (9,568 bytes)
13. Re: XFS & ADSM (score: 1): Author: Trond Hasle Amundsen <t.h.amundsen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 03 Jul 2001 12:52:47 +0200; An easier solution is to configure TSM to assume that the partition is only a directory. For example, if you want backup of /var, which on your machine is a partition, put this in the config file: vi; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00080.html (9,223 bytes)
14. XFS & ADSM (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 11:58:15 +0200; On a system with XFS installed (using the RH 7.1 iso) I'm not able to backup my files using ADSM (backup on tape). Without XFS there's no problem. I also tried disabling devfs but this did not work; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01340.html (7,517 bytes)
15. Re: XFS & ADSM (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 14:07:52 +0200; To put it midly, ADSM is a POS. For some reason it checks the filesystem type of the partition where the data it is trying to backup is located, finds it's "xfs", it has no idea what that is and bom; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01341.html (8,846 bytes)
16. Re: XFS & ADSM (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 18:38:42 +0200; Am Montag, 2. Juli 2001 14:07 schrieb Marcelo E. Magallon: It's not that bad. If you use a more recent backup client, it should work. The most recent version 4.2.0 of TSM even supports XFS . ...Juerg; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01350.html (9,044 bytes)
17. Re: XFS & ADSM (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 19:23:17 +0200; It's unfortunately not even an ADSM only problem. e.g. Arkeia has the same one and even VMWare checks file system types for some unknown reason. -Andi; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01352.html (9,147 bytes)
18. Re: XFS & ADSM (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 19:25:58 +0200; Sounds great, but if I check the website of Tivoli, the most recent version seems to be 4.1.2 (http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/clients.html#clients). So where did you get version 4.2.0? We; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01353.html (8,466 bytes)
19. Re: XFS & ADSM (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 19:44:01 +0200; Am Montag, 2. Juli 2001 19:25 schrieb Werner Maes: It was released on July 01 :-) Look at: ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/client/v4r2/Linux86/v420 The guy; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01355.html (9,293 bytes)
20. Re: XFS & ADSM (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 18:47:57 +0200; Am Montag, 2. Juli 2001 18:38 schrieb Juergen Hasch: I guess I was a little to optimistic. I shouldn't write things I don't understand much of. ...Juergen; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01358.html (8,392 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]